Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:50:46.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect on the amount of residual milk of the interval between milkings, duration of milking, and delay between udder stimulation and milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gillian M. Elliott
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Summary

Using an experimental method of half-udder comparisons the effects on the amount of residual milk of varying milking intervals, the duration of milking, and the delay between the stimulation of milk ejection and the start of milking were measured. Yield of residual milk was not related to the length of milking intervals within the range of 4–16 h but the butterfat content was directly related to the length of the interval. Neither the yield nor the butterfat content of residual milk was affected by a change in the duration of milking of 1 min. A delay between the stimulation of ejection and the start of milking of 6–8 min resulted in increasing the yield of residual milk by about 1 lb.

It is suggested that these results indicate that milk ejection is sufficiently persistent that residual milk is unlikely to be affected by delays between stimulation of milking and the start of milking until they exceed 4–6 min.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dodd, F. H., Foot, A. S. & Henriques, E. (1949). J. Dairy Res. 16, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. M. (1959). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 21, 435, 481.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. M., Dodd, F. H. & Brumby, P. J. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. (1952). Ada agric. scand. 2, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. & Petersen, W. E. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, p. 251. Ames: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1953). Aust. J. agric. Res. 4, 118.Google Scholar