Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:37:03.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dipeptide utilization by starter streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

B. A. Law
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

Of 8 strains of Streptococcus cremoris tested, 5 grew almost as well in defined media in which various essential amino acids were supplied in dipeptides as they did in media containing the equivalent free amino acids. The remainder grew poorly or not at all in the peptide-containing media. Growth of peptide-utilizing strains was inhibited by also including structurally-related dipeptides in the medium, presumably due to competition for uptake by transport system carriers. Both types of starters produced cell-free dipeptidases recoverable from the medium of exponential phase cultures. Addition of the partly-purified extracellular dipeptidases to dipeptidecontaining test media initiated growth in strains unable to use peptides. Str. lactis grew in defined peptide media, but the further addition of structurally-related dipeptides did not inhibit growth, either bcause each dipeptide was transported by a specific carrier or because peptides were hydrolysed extracellularly. The presence of cell-bound extracellular dipeptidase was indicated by the hydrolysis of dipeptides with washed whole cells in buffer. This was not observed with Str. cremoris strains.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cascieri, T. & Mallette, M. F. (1976). Journal of General Microbiology 92, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exterkate, F. A. (1975). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 29, 303.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1962). British Journal of Nutrition 16, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. A., Sezgin, E. & Sharpe, M. E. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. A., Sharpe, M. E. & Reiter, B. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D. M. & Payne, J. W. (1976). In Peptide Transport and Protein Nutrition. (Eds Matthews, D. M. and Payne, J. W..) Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Mou, L., Sullivan, J. J. & Jago, G. R. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, J. & Sharpe, M. E. (1958). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W. (1968). Journal of Biological Chemistry 243, 3395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W. (1976). Advances in Microbial Physiology 13, 56.Google Scholar
Payne, J. W. & Gilvarg, C. (1968). Journal of Biological Chemistry 243, 6291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W. & Gilvarg, C. (1971). Advances in Enzymology 35, 187.Google Scholar
Reiter, B. & Oram, J. D. (1962). Journal of Dairy Research 29, 63.Google Scholar
Sorhaug, T. & Solberg, P. (1973). Applied Microbiology 25, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, T. D., Jarvis, B. D. W. & Skipper, N. A. (1974). Journal of Bacteriology 118, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar