Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T12:14:10.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gas packing milk powder with a mixture of nitrogen and hydrogen in the presence of palladium catalyst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Abbot
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. F. Hearne
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, London

Summary

Whole and skimmed milk spray dried powders have been gas packed by two methods, and the chemical and physical changes taking place during storage at 17 and 37 °C for two years have been measured. The conventional method of double gas packing with nitrogen, with an interval of several days for desorption, was used as a control for a new method employing a single gas packing with a mixture of nitrogen (90%) and hydrogen (10%) plus the inclusion within the can of a solid catalyst pellet containing palladium.

The new system was more effective in removing oxygen and in maintaining an almost oxygen free atmosphere within the cans. Used on a commercial scale it would have several important advantages over the conventional method, and both whole and skimmed milk powders packed in this way would probably be usable after storage for 10 years at normal temperatures.

Because of the low general level of oxygen in all the cans packed by both methods and because of the low moisture content there was little difference in the keeping quality of the powders. What little there was, however, was in favour of the new method.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassette, R. & Keeney, M. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1951). B.S. 1743, Methods for the chemical analysis of dried milk.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, J. E. (1953). J. agric. Fd Chem. 1, 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, G. R., Smith, J. A. B., Wright, N. C. & Waite, R. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 498.Google Scholar
King, J. (1955). Food Manuf. 30, 441.Google Scholar
Lea, C. H. & Gane, R. (1946). J. Dairy Res. 14, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, C. H., Moran, T. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943). J. Dairy Res. 13, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus Hills, G. & Thiel, C. C. (1946). J. Dairy Res. 14, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar