Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-67gxp Total loading time: 1.29 Render date: 2021-03-07T03:33:01.188Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Costs of mastitis: facts and perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2008

Kirsten Huijps
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Theo JGM Lam
Affiliation:
Dutch Udder Health Centre, Deventer, The Netherlands
Henk Hogeveen
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands Chair Group Business Economics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

A model to calculate the economic losses of mastitis on an average Dutch dairy farm was developed and used as base for a tool for farmers and advisors to calculate farm-specific economic losses of mastitis. The economic losses of a clinical case in a default situation were calculated as €210, varying from €164 to €235 depending on the month of lactation. The total economic losses of mastitis (subclinical and clinical) per cow present in a default situation varied between €65 and €182/cow per year depending on the bulk tank somatic cell count. The tool was used to measure perception of the total economic losses of mastitis on the farm and the farmers' assessment of the cost factors of mastitis on 78 dairy farms, of which 64 were used for further analyses. Most farmers (72%) expected their economic losses to be lower than those revealed by our calculation made with their farm information. Underestimating the economic losses of mastitis can be regarded as a general problem in the dairy sector. The average economic losses assessed by the farmers were €78/cow per year, but a large variation was given, €17–198/cow per year. Although the average assessment of the farmers of the different cost factors is close to the default value, there is much variation. To improve the adoption rate of advice and lower the incidence of mastitis, it is important to show the farmers the economic losses of mastitis on their farm. The tool described in this paper can play a role in that process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bar, D, Gröhn, YT, Bennett, G, Gonzalez, RN, Hertl, JA, Schulte, HF, Tauer, LW, Welcome, FL & Schukken, YH 2007 Effect of repeated episodes of generic clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90 46434653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJGM, Beiboer, ML, Wilmink, H, Benedictus, G & Brand, A 1998 Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 81 411419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Haas, Y, Barkema, HW & Veerkamp, RF 2002 The effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on the lactation curve for somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 85 13141323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, R, Howard, WH, Leslie, KE & Lissemore, K 1990 Economics of mastitis control. Journal of Dairy Science 73 33403348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gröhn, YT, Wilson, DJ, Gonzalez, RN, Hertl, JA, Schulte, H, Bennett, G & Schukken, YH 2004 Effect of pathogen specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87 33583374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halasa, TH, Huijps, K, Østerås, O & Hogeveen, H 2007 Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Veterinary Quarterly 29 1831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogeveen, H & Østerås, O 2005 Mastitis management in an economic framework Mastitis in Dairy Production. Current knowledge and future solutions. 4th IDF International Mastitis Conference Maastricht, pp. 4152. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
Hortet, P & Seegers, H 1998 Calculated milk production losses associated with elevated somatic cell counts in dairy cows: review and critical discussion. Veterinary Research 29 497510Google ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K & Hogeveen, H 2007 Stochastic modelling to determine the economic effects of blanket, selective and no dry cow therapy. Journal of Dairy Science 90 12251234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, D, Jansen, J, Renes, RJ, Leeuwis, C & Van der Zwaag, HG 2005 Social factors related to mastitis and control practices: The role of dairy farmers' knowledge, attitude, values, behaviour and networks Mastitis in Dairy Production. Current knowledge and future solutions. 4th IDF International Mastitis Conference Maastricht, pp. 567582. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
Lam, TJGM, Jansen, J, Van den Borne, BHP & Van Veersen, J 2007 A structural approach of udder health improvement via private practitioners: ups and downs. NMC Annual Meeting 2007 San Antonio TX, USA pp 142151.Google Scholar
Lucey, S & Rowlands, GJ 1984 The association between clinical mastitis and milk yield in dairy cows. Animal Production 39 165175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, JP 1996 Old economics for new problems – livestock disease: presidential address. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47 295314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepers, JA & Dijkhuizen, AA 1991 The economics of mastitis and mastitis control in dairy cattle – a critical analysis of estimates published since 1970. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10 213224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepers, JA, Lam, TJGM, Schukken, YH, Wilmink, JBM & Hanekamp, WJA 1997 Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine threshold for uninfected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science 80 18331840CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Leslie, KE, Weersink, AJ & Martin, SW 1992 Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program 1. Impact on somatic cell counts and milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 75 33523358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, AW, Jones, GM, Gunn, GJ, Chase-Topping, M, Humphry, RW, Richardson, H & Logue, DN 2002 Optimum replacement policies for the control of subclinical mastitis due to S. aureus in dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53 627644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A & Kahneman, D 1986 Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59 251278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M, Laarup-Laursen, B, Houe, H, Fossing, C & Andersen, HJ 2002 Farmers' choice of medical treatment of mastitis in Danish dairy herds based on qualitative research interviews. Journal of Dairy Science 85 9921002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valeeva, NI, Lam, TJGM & Hogeveen, H 2007 Motivation of dairy farmers to improve mastitis management. Journal of Dairy Science 90 44664477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Borne, BHP, Van Schaik, H, De Jong, G, Lam, TJGM 2006 Determination of a definition of subclinical mastitis incidence based on somatic cell counts in the Netherlands. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Cairns, Australia, pp. 609612.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 101
Total number of PDF views: 447 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 7th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Costs of mastitis: facts and perception
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Costs of mastitis: facts and perception
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Costs of mastitis: facts and perception
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *