Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:43:32.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

524. The influence of feeding tocopherol to dairy cows on the yield of milk and milk-fat and on the tocopherol content and keeping quality of the butter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Jens Nielsen
Affiliation:
National Research Institute of Animal Husbandry, Copenhagen
Anders N. Fisker
Affiliation:
Government Research Dairy, Hillerød
Aage H. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Government Research Dairy, Hillerød
Inge Prange
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Polytechnic Institute, Copenhagen
Ebbe Søndergaard
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Polytechnic Institute, Copenhagen
Henrik Dam
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Polytechnic Institute, Copenhagen

Extract

Supplementation of a typical Danish winter ration with 2 g. of DL-α-tocopherol acetate per cow per day did not result in an increased yield of milk or milk-fat. The keeping quality of the butter was practically uninfluenced or possibly slightly reduced by the supplementation. The supplementation caused a rise in the tocopherol content of the butter from 10 to 12µg./g. in the unsupplemented group to 23–26/µg./g. in the supplemented group. After the experimental period the amount of total tocopherol in the butter decreased rapidly. It increased again when the cows went to pasture.

Butter-fat obtained from the unsupplemented group with 9·6–13·2µg. tocopherol/g. and from the supplemented group with 27·3–31·2µg. tocopherol/g. did not produce encephalomalacia in chicks when incorporated at a level of 30% instead of lard in a suitable test diet, but the amount of tocopherol present, especially in the butter-fat from the unsupplemented group, was not sufficient to prevent white striation of breast muscles in chicks under the same conditions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Burr, G. O.Lundberg, W. O. & Chipault, J. R. (1946). Oil & Soap, 23, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Dam, H. (1953). Experientia (Suppl. I), p. 195.Google Scholar
(3)Dam, H., Kruse, I., Prange, I. & Søndergaard, E. (1948). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 2, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Dam, H., Prange, I. & Søndergaard, E. (1952). Acta path, microbiol. scand. 31, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Gullickson, T. W., Fitch, J. B. & Gilmore, L. O. (1948). J. Dairy Sci. 31, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Harris, P. L., Swanson, W. J. & Hickman, K. C. D. (1947). J. Nutrit. 33, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Krukovsky, V. N. & Loosli, J. K. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Mattson, S. (1949). Meddellande nr. 26, Statens Mejeriförsök. Malmø.Google Scholar
(9)Mattson, S. (1951). Meddellande nr. 33, Statens Mejeriförsök. Malmø.Google Scholar
(10)Reinart, A. (1949). Proc. 12. Intern. Dairy Congr. (Stockholm), 2, 405.Google Scholar
(11)Statens Smørbedømmelser, Aarsberetning, p. 40. Copenhagen, 1941.Google Scholar
(12)Swartling, P. (1949). Proc. 12. Intern. Dairy Congr. (Stockholm), 2, 375.Google Scholar