Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T06:28:11.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

426. Some bacteriological aspects of the deterioration of pasteurized milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

T. R. Ashton
T. R. Ashton
Affiliation:
Express Dairy Company (London) Ltd.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Examinations have been made of milk pasteurized by the L.T. ‘Holder’ and H.T.S.T. processes using the same original bulk raw milk. In the preparation of samples care was taken to eliminate the possibility of post-pasteurization contamination. It was hoped that any differences found would be due solely to the effects of the pasteurizing processes above.

2. Samples were examined by (a) colony counts and coliform tests when fresh and after ageing at 18°C. for 24 and 48 hr., (b) methylene-blue and resazurin reduction tests when fresh and after ageing at 18°C. for 45½hr., (c) keeping quality at 18°C. to end-point of 68% alcohol and clot-on-boiling tests. All bacteriological and dye reduction tests were carried out at incubation temperatures of 37, 30 and 22°C.

3. In seven trials the experiments were repeated after storage of the original raw milk for 24 hr. at 40–50°F. (4·4–10·0°C.).

4. Some detailed examinations were made of the bacterial floras of the raw and corresponding pasteurized milks, both when fresh and after ageing.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , October 1950 , pp. 261 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ministry of Health (1941). Circ. No. 2423. Milk (Special Designations) Regulations. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
(2)North, C. E. & Park, H. (1929). Amer. J. Hyg. 7, 147.Google Scholar
(3)Provan, A. L. & Rowlands, A. (1939). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 15.Google Scholar
(4)Clegg, L. F. L. & Lomax, K. L. (1946). Dairy Industr. 11, 488.Google Scholar
(5)Davis, J. G. & Watson, D. W. (1946). Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. p. 81.Google Scholar
(6)McKenzie, D. A. & Booth, C. E. (1945). Proc. Soc. appl. Bad. p. 31.Google Scholar
(7)McKenzie, D. A. (1947). Dairy Industr. 12, 764.Google Scholar
(8)Thomas, S. B., Griffiths, D. G., Morgan, K. J. & Lewis, T. J. (1948). Dairy Industr. 13, 443.Google Scholar
(9)Thomas, S. B. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1948). Dairyman, 65, 101.Google Scholar
(10)Mattick, A. T. R. & Hiscox, E. R. (1937). 11th Worlds' Dairy Congr. Rep. 3, 344.Google Scholar
(11)Reid, A. W. (1946). Dairy Industr. 11, 740.Google Scholar
(12)Egdell, J. W. & Bird, E. R. (1949). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 2, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)United States Public Health Service (1939). Publ. Hlth Bull. no. 220.Google Scholar
(14)Dahlberg, A. C. (1932). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 203.Google Scholar
(15)Holland, R. S. & Dahlberg, A. C. (1940). Tech. Bull. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 254.Google Scholar
(16)Holmquist, C. A. (1932). Ann. Rep. int. Ass. Dairy Insp., Wash., 20, 79.Google Scholar
(17)Mattick, A. T. R. & Hiscox, E. R. (1939). Med. Offr, 61, 177.Google Scholar
(18)Yale, M. W. (1933). Tech. Butt. N.Y. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 207.Google Scholar
(19)Quinn, J. D. & Burgwald, L. H. (1933). Milk Pl. Mthly, 22, 26.Google Scholar
(20)Workman, T. W. (1941). Ass. Bull. int. Ass. Milk Dlrs, 33, 585.Google Scholar
(21)Parfitt, E. H. (1940). 13th Ann. Rep. N.Y. Ass. Dairy Insp., Wash., p. 195.Google Scholar
(22)Kreuger, P. F. (1938). J. Milk Tech. 1, 29.Google Scholar
(23)Weinrich, C. F. (1946). Spec. Bull. Mich. St. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 335, p. 83.Google Scholar
(24)Fabian, F. W. (1942). J. Milk Tech. 5, 237.Google Scholar
(25)Millenky, A. & Brueckner, H. J. (1941). Bull. Cornell agric. Exp. Sta. no. 754.Google Scholar
(26)Hileman, J. L. & Leber, H. (1941). J. Milk Tech. 4, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(27)Lipman, L. D., Frandsen, J. H. & Lindquist, H. G. (9141). Bull. Mass, agric. Exp. Sta. no. 378, p. 54.Google Scholar
(28)Burgwald, L. H. (1946). Spec. Bull. Mich. St. Coll. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 335, p. 10.Google Scholar
(29)Dummett, G. A. & Mongar, J. L. (1944). Dairy Industr. 9, 264.Google Scholar
(30)Davis, J. G. & Sadek, G. M. (1942). Milk Ind. 22 (10), 33.Google Scholar
(31)Wilson, G. S. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Land., no. 206, p. 215.Google Scholar
(32)Davis, J. G. (1939). Food Manuf. 14, 196.Google Scholar
(33)Ministry of Agriculture (1942). Technique for the Standard Resazurin Test. Form No. C. 158/TPY.Google Scholar
(34)Ministry of Health (1944). Statutory Rules and Orders no. 349. Heat Treated Milk (Prescribed Tests) Order. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
(35)Ministry of Health (1937). Memo 139/Foods. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
(36)Anderson, E. B. & Wilson, G. S. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 21.Google Scholar
(37)Neave, F. K. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(38)Fisher, R. A. (1938). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 7th ed. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
(39)American Public Health Association (1925). Standard Methods of Water Analysis, 6th ed. New York: Amer. Publ. Hlth Ass.Google Scholar
(40)Rowlands, A. & Provan, A. L. (1941). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 36.Google Scholar
(41)Harrison, J. (1938). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 12.Google Scholar
(42)Bergey, D. H. et al. (1939). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 5th ed. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
(43)Hiscox, E. R. (1943). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 14.Google Scholar
(44)Koch, R. (1881). Mitt. Reichsgesundh. Amt. 1, 234.Google Scholar
(45)Eijkman, C. (1908). Biochem. Z. 11, 12.Google Scholar
(46)Allen, P. W. (1923). J. Bact. 8, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(47)Eckelmann, E. (1917). Zbl. Bald. Abt. II, 48, 140.Google Scholar
(48)Burke, G. S. (1923). J. infect. Dis. 33, 274.Google Scholar
(49)Abd-El-Malek, Y. & Gibson, T. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(50)Christian, M. L. (1931). J. Dairy Res. 3, 113.Google Scholar
(51)Evans, P. W. & Curran, H. R. (1943). J. Bact. 46, 513.Google Scholar
(52)Crossley, E. L. (1946). J. Dairy Res. 14, 233.Google Scholar
(53)Vernon, T. R. & Walker, L. J. (1936). Soc. agric. Bact. Ann. Conf. Paper, no. 7.Google Scholar
(54)Wilson, G. S. (1935). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 206, p. 175.Google Scholar
(55)Watson, D. W., Bessell, C. J., Goldschmidt, E. & Davis, J. G. (1946). Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. 1, 56.Google Scholar
(56)Rowlands, A. & Provan, A. L. (1941). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 29.Google Scholar
(57)Hileman, J. L., Leber, H. & Speck, M. L. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(58)Gibson, T. & Abd-El-Malek, Y. (1940). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 19.Google Scholar
(59)Abd-El-Malek, Y. (1943). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 23.Google Scholar
(60)Orla-Jensen, S. (1942). The Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
(61)Abd-El-Malek, Y. & Gibson, T. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 233.Google Scholar