Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:57:03.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

341. The effect of the pre-heating temperature on the bacterial count and storage life of whole milk powder spray-dried by the Krause process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. D. Findlay
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Constance Higginbottom
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. A. B. Smith
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr

Extract

1. Storage tests on spray-dried full-cream milk powders prepared from milk preheated at 160,170,180, 190 and 200° F. for approximately 20 sec. and dried by the Krause process have been carried out at 47, 37 and 15° C. or room temperature. The storage tests were carried out independently at two different research stations. At the Hannah Institute the powders were packed in plain tin-plate containers as received from the factory. At Cambridge grease-free plain tin-plate and lacquered tin-plate containers were used. Deterioration was followed at both stations by a tasting panel and by determination of the amount of oxygen absorbed by the powder and of the accumulation of peroxide in the fat.

2. When fresh the powder pre-heated at 180° F. had the best flavour, followed in order of preference by those pre-heated at 190 and 200° F., which had a definite but quite pleasant ‘boiled’ or ‘cooked’ flavour, and by those pre-heated at 160 and 170° F. which had an incipient tallowy flavour, but were nevertheless still acceptable. The 200 and 190° F. powders gave a strong reaction for volatile sulphur, the 180° F. powder a much weaker but quite definite reaction, and the 170 and 160° F. powders a negative reaction. The copper content of the 180° F. powder which, with the 170° F. sample, was the highest of the group, may have been partly responsible for the weakness of the reaction for volatile sulphur given by this sample. The solubility of the 180, 190 and 200° F. powders was not adversely affected by the high pre-heating temperatures, and the moisture contents of all the powders were sufficiently low to prevent any obvious loss of solubility, which remained very good indeed throughout the storage tests.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Mattick, A. T. R., Hiscox, E. R., Crossley, E. L., Lea, C. H., Findlay, J. D., Smith, J. A. B., Thompson, S. Y. & Kon, S. K. (1945). J. Dairy Res., 14, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Hunztker, O. F. (1935). Condensed Milk and Milk Powder. Published in Illinois, U.S.A., by Author.Google Scholar
(3)Scott, A. W. (1932). Bull. Hannah Dairy Res. Inst. no. 4.Google Scholar
(4)Higginbottom, C. (1945). J. Dairy Res., 14, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Findlay, J. D., Smith, J. A. B. & Lea, C. H. (1945). J. Dairy Res., 14, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Howat, G. R., Smith, J. A. B., Watte, R. & Wright, N. C. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Sylvester, N. D. & Lampitt, C. H. (1935). Analyst, 60, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Josephson, D. V. & Doan, F. J. (1939). Milk Dlr, 29, 35.Google Scholar
(9)Gould, I. A. & Sommer, H. H. (1939). Tech. Bull. Mich agric. Exp. Sta. no. 164.Google Scholar
(10)Townley, R. C. & Gould, I. A. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Lea, C. H. & Gane, R. (1946). J. Dairy Res., 14, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Chapman, R. A. & McFarlane, W. D. (1943). Canad. J. Res. B, 21, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Lea, C. H. (1945). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 64, 106.Google Scholar
(14)Lea, C. H., Moran, T. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943). J. Dairy Res. 13, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Lea, C. H. (1929). Ann. Rep. Food Invest. Bd, p. 30. (1938). Rancidity in Edible Fats. London: H.M. Stationery Office. New York: Chemical Publishing Co.Google Scholar
(16)Pearce, J. A. (1945). Canad. J. Res. 23 F, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar