Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics

Abstract

Introduction:

Many institutions are attempting to implement patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Because PROs often change clinical workflows significantly for patients and providers, implementation choices can have major impact. While various implementation guides exist, a stepwise list of decision points covering the full implementation process and drawing explicitly on a sociotechnical conceptual framework does not exist.

Methods:

To facilitate real-world implementation of PROs in electronic health records (EHRs) for use in clinical practice, members of the EHR Access to Seamless Integration of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Consortium developed structured PRO implementation planning tools. Each institution pilot tested the tools. Joint meetings led to the identification of critical sociotechnical success factors.

Results:

Three tools were developed and tested: (1) a PRO Planning Guide summarizes the empirical knowledge and guidance about PRO implementation in routine clinical care; (2) a Decision Log allows decision tracking; and (3) an Implementation Plan Template simplifies creation of a sharable implementation plan. Seven lessons learned during implementation underscore the iterative nature of planning and the importance of the clinician champion, as well as the need to understand aims, manage implementation barriers, minimize disruption, provide ample discussion time, and continuously engage key stakeholders.

Conclusions:

Highly structured planning tools, informed by a sociotechnical perspective, enabled the construction of clear, clinic-specific plans. By developing and testing three reusable tools (freely available for immediate use), our project addressed the need for consolidated guidance and created new materials for PRO implementation planning. We identified seven important lessons that, while common to technology implementation, are especially critical in PRO implementation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: T. A. Nelson, AM, LSW, Northwestern University, 375 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL, USA. Email: therese.nelson@northwestern.edu

References

Hide All
1.Greenhalgh, J, et al.Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library, 2017.
2.Patient-Reported Outcomes. National Quality Forum [Internet] [cited Oct 16, 2019]. (https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n-r/Patient-Reported_Outcomes/Patient-Reported_Outcomes.aspx)
3.Hsiao, C, et al.Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology. Quality of Life Research 2019; 28(6): 1575.
4.What you need to know before requesting PROs in your EHR. HealthMeasures [Internet], 2017 [cited Oct 12, 2019]. (http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/applications/What_you_need_to_know_before_requesting_PROs_in_your_EHR_Aug22_2017.pdf)
5.Biber, J, et al.Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2018; 2: 34.
6.Lorenzi, NM, Riley, RT.Managing Technological Change: Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
7.Damschroder, LJ, et al.Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 2009; 4: 50.
8.CFIR Technical Assistance Website. [Internet] 2018 [cited Oct 12, 2019]. (https://cfirguide.org)
9.Fox, WM.Sociotechnical system principles and guidelines: past and present. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1995; 31(1): 91105.
10.Wesley, DB, et al. A socio-technical systems approach to the use of health IT for patient reported outcomes: patient and healthcare provider perspectives. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019; 4: 100, 048.
11.Yusof, MM, et al.An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008; 77(6): 386398.
12.Erlirianto, LM, et al.The implementation of the human, organization, and technology – fit (HOT-fit) framework to evaluate the electronic medical record (EMR) system in a hospital. Procedia Computer Science 2015; 72: 580587.
13.Aaronson, N, et al. User’s Guide to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice (ISOQOL). Semantic Scholar [Internet], 2016 [cited Oct 7, 2019]. (https://www.isoqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2015UsersGuide-Version2.pdf)
14.Snyder, C, Wu, A.Users’ Guide to Implementing Patient Reported Outcomes in Health Systems (PCORI). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins; 2017. (https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-JHU-Users-Guide-To-Integrating-Patient-Reported-Outcomes-in-Electronic-Health-Records.pdf)
15.HealthMeasures. [Internet] 2019 [cited Oct 12, 2019]. (http://www.healthmeasures.net)
16.Chan, EKH, et al.Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice: A companion Guide to the ISOQOL User’s Guide. ISOQOL [Internet], 2018 [cited Oct 4, 2019]. (https://www.isoqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ISOQOL-Companion-Guide-FINAL.pdf)
17.Chan, EKH, et al.Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide. Quality of Life Research 2019; 28(6): 21.
18.Franklin, PD, et al. Framework to guide the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures in the learning healthcare system. eGems 2017; 5(1): 17.
19.Antunes, B, Harding, R, Higginson, IJ.Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliative Medicine 2014; 28: 158175.
20.Guide to selection of measures from HealthMeasures. HealthMeasures [Internet], 2016 [cited Oct 12, 2019]. (http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/applications/Guide_to_Selection_of_a_HealthMeasures_06_09_16.pdf)
21.Snyder, C, et al.Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research 2012; 21(8): 13051314.
22.Austin, E, et al. W01: How Health Systems Should Be Thinking About Clinical Integration of Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (sponsored by Consumer and Pervasive Health Informatics Working Group), American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Instructional Workshop materials, 2018.
23.Zhang, R, et al.Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open, 2019; 2(1): 7380.
24.Anatchkova, M, et al. Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2018; 2:64.
25.Warsame, R, Halyard, MY.Patient-reported outcome measurement in clinical practice: overcoming challenges to continue progress. Journal of Clinical Pathways 2017; 3(1): 4346.
26.Velikova, G, et al.Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004; 22(4): 714724.
27.Holmes, MM, et al.The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research 2017; 26: 245.
28.Basch, E, et al.Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012; 30: 42494255.
29.Gerhardt, WE, et al.Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children’s Hospital. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2018; 44(8): 441453.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Nelson et al. supplementary material
Nelson et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (42 KB)
42 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Nelson et al. supplementary material
Nelson et al. supplementary material 2

 Word (101 KB)
101 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Nelson et al. supplementary material
Nelson et al. supplementary material 3

 Word (25 KB)
25 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Nelson et al. supplementary material
Nelson et al. supplementary material 4

 Unknown (37 KB)
37 KB

Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.