2.Salas, E, Stagl, KC, Burke, CS. 25 years of team effectiveness in organizations: research themes and emerging needs. In: Cooper, CL, Robertson, IT, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. 47–92.
3.Wuchty, S, Jones, BF, Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007; 316(5827): 1036–1039.
4.Stokols, D, et al. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2): S77–S89.
5.Singh, J, Fleming, L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science 2010; 56(1): 41–56.
6.Rosenfield, PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine 1992; 35(11): 1343–1357.
7.Muller, MJ. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process 2003; 4235: 165–185.
8.Lungeanu, A, Contractor, NS. The effects of diversity and network ties on innovations: the emergence of a new scientific field. American Behavioral Scientist 2015; 59(5): 548–564.
9.Kurtzberg, TR. Feeling creative, being creative: an empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal 2005; 17(1): 51–65.
10.Disis, ML, Slattery, JT. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Science Translational Medicine 2010; 2(22): 22cm29.
11.Stokols, D, et al. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2 Suppl): S96–S115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
12.Hall, KL, et al. News from NIH: resources for team-based research to more effectively address complex public health problems. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2012; 2(4): 373–375.
13.Cooke, NJ, et al. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015.
15.Luke, DA, et al. Breaking down silos: mapping growth of cross‐disciplinary collaboration in a translational science initiative. Clinical and Translational Science 2015; 8(2): 143–149.
16.Guise, JM, et al. Organizational and training factors that promote team science: a qualitative analysis and application of theory to the National Institutes of Health’s BIRCWH career development program. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2017; 1(2): 101–107.
17.Jones, BF, Wuchty, S, Uzzi, B. Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science 2008; 322(5905): 1259–1262.
18.Tebes, JK, Thai, ND. Interdisciplinary team science and the public: steps toward a participatory team science. American Psychologist 2018; 73(4): 549.
19.Selker, HP, Wilkins, CH. From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2017; 1(1): 5–6.
20.Warnecke, RB, et al. Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: The National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. American Journal of Public Health 2008; 98(9): 1608–1615.
21.Croyle, RT. The National Cancer Institute’s transdisciplinary centers initiatives and the need for building a science of team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2): S90–S93.
22.Altman, DG. Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology 1995; 14(6): 526.
23.Hall, KL, et al. Understanding cross-disciplinary team-based research. In: Frodeman, R, Thompson, JK, Pacheco, RCS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2017. 338–356.
24.Brownson, RC. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Oxford University Press, 2017.
25.Balas, EA, Boren, SA. Managing clinical knowledge for healthcare improvements. In: Bemmel, J, McCray, AT, eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft; 2000. 65–70.
26.Yarborough, M, et al. Relationships hold the key to trustworthy and productive translational science: recommendations for expanding community engagement in biomedical research. Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(4): 310.
27.Proctor, EK, et al. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2009; 36(1): 24–34.
28.Oliver, K, Kothari, A, Mays, N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems 2019; 17(1): 33.
29.Aarons, GA, et al. Collaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency-collaborative teams to scale-up evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 2014; 43(6): 915–928.
30.Lewis, CL, et al. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: Advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science. Implementation Science; 2016; 11: 85, BioMed Central.
31.Puga, F, Stevens, KR, Patel, DI. Adopting best practices from team science in a healthcare improvement research network: the impact on dissemination and implementation. Nursing Research and Practice 2013; 2013.
32.Glasgow, RE, et al. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health 2012; 102(7): 1274–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755.
33.Tinkle, M, et al. Dissemination and implementation research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2005–2012. Nursing Research and Practice 2013; 2013.
34.Hall, KL, et al. The science of team science: a review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist 2018; 73(4): 532.
35.Salas, E, Reyes, DL, McDaniel, SH. The science of teamwork: progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist 2018; 73(4): 593.
36.Marks, MA, Mathieu, JE, Zaccaro, SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 2001; 26(3): 356–376.
37.Marlow, SL, et al. Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach? A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2018; 144: 145–170.
38.DeChurch, LA, Mesmer-Magnus, JR. Measuring shared team mental models: a meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2010; 14(1): 1.
39.De Jong, BA, Dirks, KT, Gillespie, N. Trust and team performance: a meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology 2016; 101(8): 1134.
40.D’Innocenzo, L, Mathieu, JE, Kukenberger, MR. A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management 2016; 42(7): 1964–1991.
41.Rosen, MA, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. American Psychologist 2018; 73(4): 433.
42.Edmondson, AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies 2003; 40(6): 1419–1452.
43.Chambers, DA, et al. Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing D&I research training programs. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2016; 7(3): 593–601.
44.Hall, KL, et al. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2): S243–S249.
45.Elliott, DS, Mihalic, S. Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science 2004; 5(1): 47–52.
46.Israel, BA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health 1998; 19: 173–202.
47.Concannon, TW, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2014; 29(12): 1692–1701.
48.Jones, J, Hunter, D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ: British Medical Journal 1995; 311(7001): 376.
49.Delbecq, AL, Van de Ven, AH, Gustafson, DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman Company, 1975.
50.Van de Ven, AH, Delbecq, AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. American Journal of Public Health 1972; 62(3): 337–342.
51.Fink, A, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health 1984; 74(9): 979–983.
52.Humphrey-Murto, S, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research. Medical Teacher 2017; 39(1): 14–19.
53.Edmondson, AC. Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
54.Hackman, JR. Why teams don’t work. In: Tindale, RS, et al. eds. Theory and Research on Small Groups. Boston, MA: Springer; 2002. 245–267.
55.Little, MM, et al. Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: asystematic review of the science of team science literature. Journal of Investigative Medicine 2017; 65(1): 15–22.
56.Aarons, GA, et al. Testing the Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) Intervention in substance abuse treatment: a cluster randomized trial study protocol. Implementation Science 2017; 12(1): 29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y.
57.Drahota, A, et al. Community-academic partnerships: asystematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Quarterly 2016; 94(1): 163–214.
58.Tabak, RG, et al. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012; 43(3): 337–350.
59.Nilsen, P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science 2015; 10: 53.
60.Aarons, GA, Hurlburt, M, Horwitz, SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2011; 38(1): 4–23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
61.Moullin, JC, et al. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implementation Science 2019; 14(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6.
62.Garg, T, et al. The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks. Health Research Policy and Systems 2018; 16(1): 41.