2. Briel, M, et al. A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 80: 8–15.
3. Grill, JD, Galvin, JE. Facilitating Alzheimer’s disease research recruitment. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 2014; 28: 1–8.
4. Reidy, MC, Orpinas, P, Davis, M. Successful recruitment and retention of Latino study participants. Health Promotion Practice 2012; 13: 779–787.
5. Arfken, CL, Balon, R. Declining participation in research studies. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2011; 80: 325–328.
6. Giffin, RB, Lebovitz, Y, English, RA. (eds).
7. Krischer, J, et al. Experience with direct-to-patient recruitment for enrollment into a clinical trial in a rare disease: a web-based study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017; 19: e50.
8. Herrera, AP, et al. Disparate inclusion of older adults in clinical trials: priorities and opportunities for policy and practice change. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100: S105–S112.
9. Evelyn, B, et al. Participation of racial/ethnic groups in clinical trials and race-related labeling: a review of new molecular entities approved 1995-1999. Journal of the National Medical Association 2001; 93(Suppl): 18S–24S.
10. The Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Older Americans 2016: Key indicators of well-being, 2016. Washington, DC.
11. Hutchins, LF, et al. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 341: 2061–2067.
13. George, S, Duran, N, Norris, K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health 2014; 104: e16–e31.
14. Hall, LN, et al. Promoting retention: African American older adults in a research volunteer registry. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine 2016; 2: 1–9.
15. Nicholson, LM, Schwirian, PM, Groner, JA. Recruitment and retention strategies in clinical studies with low-income and minority populations: progress from 2004–2014. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2015; 45: 34–40.
16. Tu, SP, et al. Clinical trials: understanding and perceptions of female Chinese‐American cancer patients. Cancer 2005; 104: 2999–3005.
17. Neugroschl, J, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of research in aging and dementia in an urban minority population. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2016; 53: 69–72.
18. Bishop, WP, et al. Effectiveness of a community research registry to recruit minority and underserved adults for health research. Clinical and Translational Science 2015; 8: 82–84.
19. Lauer, MS, D’Agostino, RB. The randomized registry trial—the next disruptive technology in clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 369: 1579–1581.
20. Moreno-John, G, et al. Ethnic minority older adults participating in clinical research. Journal of Aging and Health 2004; 16(Suppl.): 93S–123S.
21. Grill, JD, et al. Constructing a local potential participant registry to improve Alzheimer’s disease clinical research recruitment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2018; 63(3): 1055–1063.
22. Jefferson, AL, et al. Clinical research participation among aging adults enrolled in an Alzheimer’s Disease Center research registry. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 2011; 23: 443–452.
23. Frew, PM, et al. The likelihood of participation in clinical trials can be measured: the Clinical Research Involvement Scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63: 1110–1117.
24. Lee, SB, et al. Participation in clinical research registries: a focus group study examining views from patients with arthritis and other chronic illnesses. Arthritis Care & Research 2016; 68: 974–980.
25. Chadiha, LA, et al. Building a registry of research volunteers among older urban African Americans: recruitment processes and outcomes from a community-based partnership. The Gerontologist 2011; 51(Suppl. 1): S106–S115.
26. Katapodi, MC, et al. Recruiting families at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer from a statewide cancer registry: a methodological study. Cancer Causes & Control 2017; 28: 191–201.
27. Hoque, DME, et al. Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010654.
28. Sariyar, M, et al. A practical framework for data management processes and their evaluation in population-based medical registries. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2013; 38: 104–119.
29. Krysinska, K, et al. Dementia registries around the globe and their applications: a systematic review. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2017; 13: 1031–1047.
30. Williams, B, et al. Promoting research participation: Why not advertise altruism? Social Science & Medicine 2008; 66: 1451–1456.
31. Aneshensel, CS, Harig, F, Wight, RG. Aging, neighborhoods, and the built environment. In: George LK, Ferraro KF, eds. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (Eighth Edition). New York: Academic Press, 2016, pp. 315–335.
32. McCambridge, J, Kypri, K, Elbourne, D. Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2014; 67: 845–849.
33. Garza, MA, et al. The influence of race and ethnicity on becoming a human subject: factors associated with participation in research. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2017; 7: 57–63.
34. Luebbert, R, Perez, A. Barriers to clinical research participation among African Americans. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2016; 27: 456–463.