OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In this study, we implemented deformable medial modeling as a morphometric approach in first trimester placentas to characterize morphometric differences between fully automated and manual segmentations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Twenty placentas from singleton pregnancies between 11-14 weeks’ gestation were manually and automatically segmented from 3D ultrasound volumes. Automated segmentations were produced by a trained convolutional neural network pipeline. Dice overlap scores and volumes were computed between manual and automated segmentations. Deformable medial modeling was applied to both manual and automated segmentations to produce the following metrics: maternal and chorionic surface areas (SA), thickness, circumference, and diameter along the generated medial surface. Placental non-planarity was also determined as the greatest medial surface height difference. A paired t-test and simple linear regression was performed between manual and automated segmentations for each shape metric. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Mean placental volume measurements between manual and automated segmentations were similar, with a percent difference of 3.28% and a mean Dice overlap score of 0.85 ± 0.07. There were strong, statistically significant (p <0.01) linear correlations with chorionic and maternal SA, SA difference, thickness, circumference, medial surface diameter, and medial surface height difference. No significant differences were noted with chorionic SA, thickness, circumference, maximum medial surface diameter, or medial surface height difference. However, statistically significant differences (p <0.01-0.03) were noted in maternal SA, SA difference, and mean medial surface diameter. Despite these differences, mean percent difference for all morphometric parameters was less than or equal to 10%. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: A deformable medial model evaluate unique global and regional shape placental features with highly correlated values between manual versus automated placental segmentations. However, clinical studies are needed to determine if minor differences would impact the clinical utility of these features as potential indicators of placental function.