Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T07:20:38.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

So many variables, but what causes what?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2023

Cécile DE CAT
Affiliation:
University of Leeds & UiT Arctic University of Norway
Sharon UNSWORTH*
Affiliation:
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen
*
*Corresponding author. Sharon Unsworth, Radboud University, Nijmegen. Email: sharon.unsworth@ru.nl

Extract

Paradis’ keynote article provides a comprehensive overview of factors influencing bilingual children’s dual language abilities. It includes the ‘usual suspects’, such as input quantity, and also highlights areas requiring further investigation, such as cognitive abilities. As such, it will no doubt serve as a valuable basis for the field as we move forward. Paradis quite rightly points out that whilst some of these factors may be unidirectionally related to language abilities, suggesting causality, for many others such relations are bi- or multidirectional and as such, caution is required in interpreting them. In order to pinpoint the nature and direction of these relations (currently absent from Figure 1 in the keynote), more complex analytic techniques are needed, as Paradis herself notes: “The relations among attitudes/identity, input and interaction, and perhaps social adjustment and wellbeing, are likely to be complex; therefore, more complex analytic techniques are needed to understand the path(s) between family attitudes about the HL on one hand, and children’s HL outcomes on the other.” (Paradis, 2023: 19). In this commentary, we provide an illustration of how the complex relationships between the variables discussed in Paradis’s keynote article could be conceptualised within a causal inference approach. We offer a modest starting point by summarising key features of causal inference modelling and by illustrating how it might help us better understand what causes what.

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, K., Davies, V., de Kamps, M., Tennant, P., Mbotwa, J., & Gilthorpe, M. (2020). Reflection on modern methods: generalized linear models for prognosis and intervention—theory, practice and implications for machine learning, International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(6), 20742082. doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernán, M. A., Hsu, J., & Healy, B. (2019). A second chance to get causal inference right: A classification of data science tasks, CHANCE, 32(1), 4249. doi:10.1080/09332480.2019.1579578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huitfeldt, A. (2016). Is caviar a risk factor for being a millionaire? British Medical Journal, 355. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6536Google ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals’. Journal of Child Language, 50(4), 793–817. doi:10.1017/S0305000922000708Google Scholar
Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M., Liskiewicz, M., & Ellison, G. (2016). Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ’dagitty’. International Journal of Epidemiology 45(6), 18871894.Google ScholarPubMed
Westreich, D., & Greenland, S. (2013). The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(4), 292298. doi:10.1093/aje/kws412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed