Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T16:04:00.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonological Variation in Child-Directed Speech is Modulated by Lexical Frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2023

Eon-Suk KO*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea
Jongho JUN*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
*
Corresponding authors: Eon-Suk Ko and Jongho Jun; Emails: eonsukko@chosun.ac.kr; jongho@snu.ac.kr.
Corresponding authors: Eon-Suk Ko and Jongho Jun; Emails: eonsukko@chosun.ac.kr; jongho@snu.ac.kr.

Abstract

We investigate whether child-directed speech (CDS) contains a higher proportion of canonical pronunciations compared to adult-directed speech (ADS), focusing on Korean noun stem-final obstruent variation. In a word-teaching task, we observed that mothers use a higher rate of canonical pronunciation when addressing infants than when addressing adults. In a follow-up experiment, adults exhibited a higher rate of canonical pronunciation for high- than low-frequency words. Additional analyses conducted with only the high-frequency monosyllabic words from the two experiments found no evidence for simplified phonology in CDS when lexical frequency was controlled for. Our findings suggest that the higher rate of canonical forms in CDS, with respect to Korean morphophonological rules, is mediated by the frequency of word usage. Thus, the didactic function of CDS phonology appears to be a byproduct of mothers using familiar words with children. These results highlight the importance of considering word usage in investigating the nature of CDS.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E., Boyle, E., Doherty, G. M., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S., & Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task corpus. Language and Speech, 34, 351366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. WW Norton.Google Scholar
Anttila, A. (1997). Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. Ph. D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Baran, J. A., Laufer, M. Z., & Daniloff, R. (1977). Phonological contrastivity in conversation: A comparative study of Voice Onset Time. Journal of Phonetics 5 (4): 339–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. In Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, J. N. (1998). Positional faithfulness, Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest. AAI9823717. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI9823717Google Scholar
Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60.1, 92111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1982). An acoustic study of mothers’ speech to language-learning children: An analysis of vowel articulation characteristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1984a). Patterns of vowel modification in mother–child speechJournal of Child Language11(3), 557578. doi:10.1017/S030500090000595XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1984b). Phonological rule usage in mother-child speech. Journal of Phonetics 12 (3): 245–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30881-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6 (2): 201–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckler, H., Goy, H., & Johnson, E. K. (2018). What infant-directed speech tells us about the development of compensation for assimilation. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 4562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002). What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science, 296:1435. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14 (3): 261–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, M., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2020). Early Language Experience in a Tseltal Mayan Village. Child Development, 91 (5): 18191835https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H.-Y. (2004). A survey of standard pronunciation III [phyocunpalum silthecosa III] Seoul: The National Academy of Korean Language.Google Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. (2002). Phonological variation and lexical frequency. In Schardl, A., Walkow, M. & Abdurrahman, M., (Eds.), NELS 38 .1. Amherst: GLSA., 189202.Google Scholar
Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2014). The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 41 (4): 913–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cychosz, M., Edwards, J. R., Ratner, N. B., Torrington, E. C., & Newman, R. S. (2021). Acoustic-lexical characteristics of child-directed speech between 7 and 24 months and their impact on toddlers’ phonological processing. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (September): 712647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, L. C., Millett, A. L., Mcauley, J. D., & Bergeson, T. R. (2014). Phonetic variation in consonants in infant-directed and adult-directed speech: The case of regressive place assimilation in word-final alveolar stops. Journal of Child Language 41 (1): 155–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilley, L. C., Gamache, J., Wang, Y., Houston, D. M., & Bergeson, T. R. (2019). Statistical distributions of consonant variants in Infant-directed speech: Evidence that /t/ may be exceptional. Journal of Phonetics 75 (July): 7387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, Y.-A. (2013). Biased Learning of Phonological Alternations. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (2000). Speech to infants as hyperspeech: Knowledge-driven processes in early word recognition. Phonetica 57 (2–4): 242–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 20 (1): 104–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 279293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J., & Watt, D. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81 (1): 177206. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsche, R., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Song, J.-Y. (2021). Do adults produce phonetic variants of /t/ less often in speech to children? Journal of Phonetics 87 (July): 101056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84 (3): 474–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35 (3): 515–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008641CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, G. R. (1991). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3 (2): 223–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, K. M., Ratner, N. B., & Newman, R. S. (2017). Infant-directed speech (IDS) vowel clarity and child language outcomes. Journal of Child Language 44 (5): 1140–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, B. (2004). Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W., (eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, 1st ed., 158203. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486418.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (2006). Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, G., Cabiddu, F., Barrett, D. J. K., Castro, A., & Lee, B. (2023). How the characteristics of words in child-directed speech differ from adult-directed speech to influence children’s productive vocabularies. First Language, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221150070Google Scholar
Jun, J. (1996). Place assimilation is not the result of gestural overlap: Evidence from Korean and English. Phonology 13 (3): 377407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, J. (2010). Stem-final obstruent variation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19 (2): 137–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalashnikova, M., Carignan, C., & Burnham, D. (2017). The origins of babytalk: smiling, teaching or social convergence?. Royal Society open science, 4(8), 170306. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, B.-M., & Kim, H. G. (2009). Korean Word Usage Frequency. [Hangugeo Sayong Pinto.] Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.Google Scholar
Kang, E. J., Lee, H. Y., & Kim, J. W. (2004). The phonetic realization of syllable codas in Korean. Malsori 49, Journal of the Korean Society of Phonetic Science and Speech Technology, 130.Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. (2021). Hierarchical Inference in Sound Change: Words, Sounds, and Frequency of Use. Frontiers in psychology 12, 652664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652664CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, G. S., Cohn, J. F., & Moore, C. A. (1996). A combination of vocal f0 dynamic and summary features discriminates between three pragmatic categories of infant-directed speech. Child Development, 67, 205217.Google ScholarPubMed
Ko, E.-S. (2012). Nonlinear development of speaking rate in child-directed speech. Lingua 122 (8): 841–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, E.-S., Han, N. R., Strassel, S., & Martey, N. (2003). Korean Telephone Conversations Transcripts, Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) catalog number LDC2003T08 and ISBN 1-58563-264-3.Google Scholar
Ko, E. S., Jo, J., On, K. W., & Zhang, B. T. (2020). Introducing the Ko Corpus of Korean Mother-Child Interaction. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 602623. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277 (5326): 684–86. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 126. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Liu, H. M., Tsao, F. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Acoustic analysis of lexical tone in Mandarin infant-directed speech. Developmental Psychology 43 (4): 912–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McMurray, B., Kovack-Lesh, K. A., Goodwin, D., & McEchron, W. (2013). Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing development or an unintended consequence? Cognition, 129 (2): 362–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moslin, B. (1979). The role of phonetic input in the child’s acquisition of the voiced-voiceless contrast in English stops: a VOT analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language (2021). NIKL Spoken Corpus (v.1.2). URL: https://corpus.korean.go.krGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, Id rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (Eds.), Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. NY: Cambridge University Press., 21.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1990). There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. Linguistic Approaches to Phonetics Papers Presented in Honor of J.C. Catford 18 (2): 153–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30399-7Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L. (1991). Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: (TD) deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican Mesolect. Language Variation and Change, 3 (2): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000051XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B. S. (1984). Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language, 60, 320342. doi: 10.2307/413643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B. S. (2001). Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. in Bybee, J. L. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 123136. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.07phiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. R. (1973). Syntax and vocabulary of mothers’ speech to young children: Age and sex comparisons. Child Development, 44 (1): 182–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development: Child-directed speech and vocabulary. Child Development 83 (5): 1762–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shockey, L., & Bond, Z. S. (1980). Phonological processes in speech addressed to children. Phonetica 37 (4): 267–74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & Best, C. T. (2002). Infants’ listening preferences: Baby talk or happy talk? Infancy 3 (3): 365–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0303_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babiesJournal of Child Language. 4, 122. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900000453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1999). Voice onset time in speech to infants and adults. Phonetica, 56 (3–4): 186–99. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Kajikawa, S., Fais, L., & Amano, S. (2007). Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese. Cognition 103 (1): 147–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.03.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamuner, T. (2004). Input-Based Phonological Acquisition. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar