Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:46:59.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic influences on categorization in preschool children: a crosslinguistic study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Ivelisse M. Martinez  and
Marilyn Shatz
Ivelisse M. Martinez*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Marilyn Shatz*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
*
Developmental Psychology, University of Michigan, 525 East University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109.
Developmental Psychology, University of Michigan, 525 East University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on categorization suggests that information conveyed by language may be a guide for children performing classification tasks. In our study we asked whether differences between languages in linguistic form influence this performance. Thirty-five three- and four-year-old monolingual speakers of Spanish and English, languages differing in the way they encode gender, were tested in their native countries on a classification task of familiar objects. This task assessed strategies used in (1) a free sort, (2) a sort with instructions to use natural gender, and (3) one (for the Spanish speakers) with specific instructions to use grammatical gender. Half of both the Spanish and the English groups used animacy as a sorting strategy in the first sort, whereas the majority of both groups sorted by natural gender in the second sort. Most Spanish speakers also used grammatical gender as a categorizing strategy in at least one of the sorts. Results suggest that both instructional context and language-specific experience can influence the ways children classify familiar referents.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , October 1996 , pp. 529 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported by an NSF Predoctoral Fellowship to the first author. We thank Ayla Balci and Tania Rodriguez for their assistance in collecting the data and Patrice S. Beddor and William Croft for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the children, parents and staff of the following schools for their generous co-operation: the University of Michigan Children's Center and Mamolina-Centro Creativo Montessori.

References

REFERENCES

Alcina Franch, J. (1980). Gramática Española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Au, T. K. & Markman, E. M. (1987). Acquiring word meaning via linguistic contrast. Cognitive Development 2, 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children's grammar? In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1957). Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. & Casagrande, J. B. (1958). The function of language classifiers in behavior. In Maccoby, E. E., Newcomb, T. M. & Hartley, E. L. (eds), Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V., Gelman, S. & Lane, N. M. (1985). Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development 56, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, B. I., Leinback, M. D. & Hagan, R. (1986). Gender labeling and the adoption of sex-typed behaviours. Developmental Psychology 22, 440–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Rochel (1972). Logical capacity of very young children: number invariance rules. Child Development 43, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1990). How does Language acquire gender markers? In Denning, K. & Kemmer, S. (eds), On language: selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Pina, F. (1984). Teorias psicosociolinguísticas y su aplicación a la acquisición del español como lengua materna. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Hickling, A. K. & Gelman, S. A. (1995). How does your garden grow ? Early conceptualization of seeds and their place in the plant growth cycle. Child Development 66, 856–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. H. & Mannheim, B. (1992). Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M. & Gentner, D. (1993). Linguistic relativity vs. universal ontology: cross-linguistic studies of the object/substance distinction. Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro- and macro-developmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science 3, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: a reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M. & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology 16, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiot, M. & Roberts, M. (1979). Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir, and Whorf revisited. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1986). The acquisition of gender. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, M. K. (1990). Children's classifications of nature and artifact pictures into female and male categories. Sex Roles 23, 577–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: what Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language 18, 571–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sera, M. F., Berge, C. A. H. & del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attributional of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development 9, 261–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, R. (1984). Adquisición y utilización del articulo. In Siguán, M. (ed.), Estudios sobre psicología del lenguaje infantil. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Teschner, R. V. & Russell, W. M. (1984). The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: an inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics 1, 115–32.Google Scholar
Valian, V. V. (1986). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Developmental Psychology 22, 562–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. R. (1990). Biases and the establishment of conceptual hierarchies: evidence from preschool children. Cognitive Development 5, 123–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschooler's use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development 1, 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehren, A. & De Lisi, R. (1983). The development of gender understanding: judgments and explanations. Child Development 54, 1568–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar