Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Individual differences in non-adjacent statistical dependency learning in infants

  • Jill LANY (a1) and Amber SHOAIB (a1)

Abstract

There is considerable controversy over the factors that shape infants’ developing knowledge of grammar. Work with artificial languages suggests that infants’ ability to track statistical regularities within the speech they hear could, in principle, support grammatical development. However, little work has tested whether infants’ performance on laboratory tasks reflects factors that are relevant in real-world language learning. Here we tested whether the language that infants hear at home, and their receptive language skills, predict their performance on tasks assessing the ability to learn non-adjacent statistical dependencies (NADs) at 15 months, and whether that in turn predicts sensitivity to native-language NADs at 18 months. We found evidence for some (though not all) of these relations, and primarily for females. The results suggest that performance on the artificial language-learning task reveals something about the mechanisms of grammatical development, and that females and males may be learning NADs differently.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Department of Psychology, Haggar Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: jlany@nd.edu

References

Hide All
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. S. (1991). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms (Vol. 20). Cambridge University Press.
Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development: administration manual (3rd ed.). Psychorp.
Beech, J. R., & Beauvois, M. W. (2006). Early experience of sex hormones as a predictor of reading, phonology, and auditory perception. Brain and Language, 96(1), 4958.
Cartwright, T. A., & Brent, M. R. (1997). Syntactic categorization in early language acquisition: formalizing the role of distributional analysis. Cognition, 63, 121–70.
Christiansen., M. H., Onnis, L., & Hockema, S. A. (2009). The secret is in the sound: from unsegmented speech to lexical categories. Developmental Science, 12, 388–95.
Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S., & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech, 51 (1/2), 6175.
Culbertson, J., Koulaguina, E., Gonzalez-Gómez, N., batesdre, G., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Developing knowledge of nonadjacent dependencies. Developmental Psychology, 52, 2174–83.
Fisher, C., & Tokura, H. (1996). Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence. Child Development, 67, 3192–218.
Friederici, A. D., Mueller, J. L., & Oberecker, R. (2011). Precursors to natural grammar learning: preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS One, 6 (3), e17920.
Friederici, A. D., Pannekamp, A., Partsch, C., Ulmen, U., Oehler, K., Schmutzler, R., & Hesse, V. (2008). Sex hormone testosterone affects language organization in the infant brain. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 19, 283–6.
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–6.
Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70 (2), 109–35.
Gómez, R. L., & Lakusta, L. (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction in 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7, 567–80.
Gómez, R. L., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183206.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: P.H. Brookes.
Höhle, B., Schmitz, M., Santelmann, L. M., & Weissenborn, J. (2006). The recognition of discontinuous verbal dependencies by German 19-month-olds: evidence for lexical and structural influences on children's early processing capacities. Language Learning and Development, 2, 277300.
Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Advances in Infancy Research, 5, 6995.
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 343–65.
Jusczyk, P. W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Nelson, D. G. K., Kennedy, L. J., Woodward, A., & Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 252–93.
Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent and mother's speech: adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4, 85110.
Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2002). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 372–92.
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–8.
Lany, J. (2014). Judging words by their covers and the company they keep: probabilistic cues support word learning. Child Development, 85, 1727–39.
Lany, J., & Gómez, R. L. (2008). Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning. Psychological Science, 19, 1247–52.
Lany, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). From statistics to meaning: infant acquisition of lexical categories. Psychological Science, 21, 284–91.
Lany, J., Shoaib, A., Thompson, A., & Estes, K. G. (2018). Infant statistical-learning ability is related to real-time language processing. Journal of Child Language, 45(2), 368–91.
Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T. (2010). Comprehension of infrequent subject–verb agreement forms: evidence from French-learning children. Child Development, 81 (6), 1859–75.
Lidz, J., & Gleitman, L. R. (2004). Argument structure and the child's contribution to language learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 157–61.
Liu, H.-M., Kuhl, P. K., & Tsao, F. M. (2003). An association between mothers’ speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science, 6, F1F10.
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101B111.
Mintz, T. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90, 91117.
Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L., & Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26, 393424.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007). The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 259305.
Mueller, J. L., Friederici, A. D., & Männel, C. (2012). Auditory perception at the root of language learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 15953–8.
Nazzi, T., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., Kresh, S., & Legendre, G. (2011). Tracking irregular morphophonological dependencies in natural language: evidence from the acquisition of subject–verb agreement in French. Cognition, 120(1), 119–35.
Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I: statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 127–62.
Ngon, C., Martin, A., Dupoux, E., Cabrol, D., Dutat, M., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). (Non)words, (non)words, (non)words: evidence for a protolexicon during the first year of life. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2434.
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., & Saffran, J. R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. Child Development, 80, 674–85.
Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604–7.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–31.
Ramírez-Esparza, N., García-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2014). Look who's talking: speech style and social context in language input to infants are linked to concurrent and future speech development. Developmental Science, 17 (6), 880–91.
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Garcia-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2015). Look who's talking: speech style and social context in language input to infants are linked to concurrent and future speech development. Developmental Science, 17, 880–91.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–8.
Saffran, J. R., & Wilson, D. P. (2003). From syllables to syntax: multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 4(2), 273–84.
Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69(2), 105–34.
Schaadt, G., Hesse, V., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Sex hormones in early infancy seem to predict aspects of later language development. Brain and Language, 141, 70–6.
Shoaib, A., Wang, T., Hay, J. F., & Lany, J. (2018). Do infants learn words from statistics? Evidence from English-learning infants hearing Italian. Cognitive Science, 42, 3083–99.
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 5371.
Van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Linking infants’ distributional learning abilities to natural language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 197209.
Van Heugten, M., & Shi, R. (2010). Infants’ sensitivity to non-adjacent dependencies across phonological phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128 (5), EL223EL228.
Wang, F. H., & Mintz, T. H. (2018). Learning nonadjacent dependencies embedded in sentences of an artificial language: when learning breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 604–14.
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24, 2143–52.
Willits, J., Saffran, J., & Lany, J. (2017). Toddlers can use semantic cues to learn difficult nonadjacent dependencies. doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4ca78
Witte, A. V., Savli, M., Holik, A., Kasper, S., & Lanzenberger, R. (2010). Regional sex differences in grey matter volume are associated with sex hormones in the young adult human brain. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1205–12.
Xu, D., Yapanel, U., & Gray, S. (2009). Reliability of the LENATM language environment analysis system in young children's natural home environment. Retrieved from <http://www.lenafoundation.org/TechReport.aspx/Reliability/LTR-05-2>.
Yang, C. D. (2004). Universal Grammar, statistics or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 451–6.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed