Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T14:57:06.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual differences differentially influence language domains and learning mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2023

Vicky CHONDROGIANNI*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh

Extract

Paradis’ (2023) keynote article is a timely documentation of the ongoing shift in focus within childhood bilingualism research from investigating the factors that modulate majority or second language (ML/L2) attainment (Chondrogianni & Marinis, 2011) to understanding the sources of variation that lead to minority heritage language (HL) maintenance. This shift of focus into individual differences (IDs) in bilingual performance across both languages reflects converging research carried out in the past twenty years reporting that, when learning barriers are not at stake, bilingual children can reach ML outcomes. It also aligns with research findings suggesting that ML educational or linguistic outcomes are directly related to the successful attainment of HL educational and linguistic milestones, which, in turn, reinforce the need for the HL to be supported.

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). Structural priming and the representation of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001212 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In Dammon, W. & Lerner, R. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 795828). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114 Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Daskalaki, E. (2022). Individual differences across domains in heritage language development. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development 49 (BUCLD 49). Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(3), 318345. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.05cho CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daskalaki, E., Blom, E., Chondrogianni, V., & Paradis, J. (2020). Effects of parental input quality in child heritage language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 47(4), 709736. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000850 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. R. (1984). Biological predispositions to learn language. In Marler, P. & Terrace, H. (Eds.), The Biology of Learning (pp. 553584). Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, J. (2022). Comprehension and production of non-canonical structures in Mandarin-speaking heritage and monolingual children with and without DLD. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kay-Raining Bird, E., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2016). Pulling it all together: The road to lasting bilingualism for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 63, 6378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kremin, L. V., & Byers-Heinlein, K. (2021). Why not both? Rethinking categorical and continuous approaches to bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(6), 15601575. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211031986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G. (2022). Justice and equity for whom? Reframing research on the “bilingual (dis)advantage.” Applied Psycholinguistics, 115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 50(4), 793817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000708Google Scholar