Skip to main content Accessibility help

Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis*

  • Virginia A. Marchman (a1) and Elizabeth Bates (a2)


Several recent studies have demonstrated strong relationships between lexical acquisition and subsequent developments within the domain of morphosyntax. A connectionist model of the acquisition of a morphological System analogous to that of the English past tense (Plunkett & Marchman, 1993) suggests that growth in vocabulary size may relate to the onset of over-regularization errors. However, this model suggests that the relationships between vocabulary size and morphosyntactic development are non-linear. Incremental increases in the number of verbs to be learned result in qualitative shifts in the treatment of both previously learned and novel forms, but only after the size of the lexicon exceeds a particular level (i.e. reaches a ‘critical mass’). In this paper we present parental report data from an extensive study of English-speaking children aged 1;4 to 2;6 using the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Toddler form (N = 1130). These data corroborate several findings from previous studies, including the early usage of unmarked verb stems and the correct production of irregular past tense forms. Further, we demonstrate support for the ‘critical mass’ view of the onset of over-regularization errors, focusing on continuity among lexical and morphological developments. In our view, these data suggest that these linguistic milestones may be paced by similar, if not identical mechanisms.


Corresponding author

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1202 W. Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA.


Hide All

This research was conducted, in part, while the first author was a postdoctoral fellow at the McDonnell-Pew Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience, San Diego, California and the Center for Research in Language (UCSD). Additional support was provided by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Research Network on the Transitions from Infancy to Childhood (Elizabeth Bates, Principal Investigator). The paper is based on a presentation at the Twenty-third Annual Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, CA (1991). Earlier versions appeared in Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 30 (1991) and as Center for Research in Language Technical Report No. 9103 (July 1991) with the title ‘Vocabulary size and composition as predictors of morphological development’. We would like to thank Philip Dale, Kim Plunkett and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions, Larry Fenson for his co-operation, and Stephen Pethick for providing many useful numbers.



Hide All
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, I. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Reilly, J. & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21, 85123.
Beeghly, M., Jernberg, E. & Burrows, E. (1989). Validity of the Early Language Inventory for use with 25-month-olds. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.
Berwick, R. (1987). Parsability and learnability. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, & Gleitman, (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39, 433–48.
Dale, P. S. (1991). The validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax at 24 months. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 565–71.
Dale, P. S., Bates, E., Reznick, S. & Morriset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months. Journal of Child Language 16, 239–50.
Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. New York: C.U.P.
Elman, J. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition 48, 7199.
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. (1991). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Technical Manual. San Diego: San Diego State University.
Fenson, L., Flynn, D., Vella, D., Omens, J., Burgess, J. & Hartung, J. (1989). Tools for the assessment of language in infants and toddlers by parental report. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51, 4959.
Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldfield, B. & Snow, C. (1985). Individual differences in language acquisition. In Gleason, J. (ed.), Language development. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Leonard, L. B., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., McGregor, K. K. & Sabbadini, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: the status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition 2, 151–79.
Locke, J. (1986). Speech perception and the emerging lexicon: an ethological perspective. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition (2nd edn), Cambridge: C.U.P.
Marchman, V. A. (1993). Constraints on plasticity in a connectionist model of the English past tense. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5, 215–34.
Marchman, V. A., Miller, R. & Bates, E. (1991). Babble and first words in children with focal brain injury. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 122.
Marcus, G. F., Ullman, M., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57 Serial No. 228.
Nelson, K. E. (1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 17, 170–87.
Nelson, K. E., Baker, N., Denninger, M., Bonvillian, J. & Kaplan, B. (1985). ‘Cookie’ vs. ‘do-it-again’: imitative-referential and personal-social-syntactic-initiating styles in young children. Linguistics 23, 433–54.
Pine, J. M. & Lieven, E. (1990). Referential style at 13 months: why age-defined cross-sectional measures are inappropriate for the study of strategy differences in early language development. Journal of Child Language 17, 625–31.
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science 253, 530–5.
Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28, 59108.
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38, 43102.
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to System building: the acquisition of morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48, 2169.
Rescorla, L. (1989). The Language Development Survey: a screening tool for delayed language in toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 587–99.
Roeper, T. (1987). The acquisition of implicit arguments and the distinction between theory, process, and mechanism. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tomblin, J. B., Shonrock, C. M. & Hardy, J. C. (1989). The concurrent validity of the Minnesota Child Development Inventory as a measure of young children's language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 101–5.
Thal, D. & Bates, E. (1988). Language and gesture in late talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31, 115–23.
Thal, D., Tobias, S. & Morrison, D. (1991). Language and gesture in late talkers: a one-year follow-up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 604–12.
Vihman, M. M., Ferguson, C. A. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: common tendencies and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 7, 340.
Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H. & Miller, J. (1985). From babbling to speech: a reassessment of the continuity issue. Language 61, 397445.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis*

  • Virginia A. Marchman (a1) and Elizabeth Bates (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.