Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comprehension of the copula: preschoolers (and sometimes adults) ignore subject–verb agreement during sentence processing

  • Benjamin DAVIES (a1), Nan XU RATTANASONE (a1) and Katherine DEMUTH (a1)

Abstract

Subject–verb (SV) agreement helps listeners interpret the number condition of ambiguous nouns (The sheep is/are fat), yet it remains unclear whether young children use agreement to comprehend newly encountered nouns. Preschoolers and adults completed a forced choice task where sentences contained singular vs. plural copulas (Where is/are the [novel noun(s)]?). Novel nouns were either morphologically unambiguous (tup/tups) or ambiguous (/geks/ = singular: gex / plural: gecks). Preschoolers (and some adults) ignored the singular copula, interpreting /ks/-final words as plural, raising questions about the role of SV agreement in learners’ sentence comprehension and the status of is in Australian English.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. E-mail: ben.davies@mq.edu.au

References

Hide All
Arias-Trejo, N., Cantrell, L. M., Smith, L. B., & Canto, E. A. A. (2014). Early comprehension of the Spanish plural. Journal of Child Language, 41(6), 1356–72.
Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). Meaning from syntax: evidence from 2-year-olds. Cognition, 114(3), 442–6.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2013). Socio-economic Indexes for Area (SEIFA), Table 1: Postal Area (POA) SEIFA Summary, 2011 (data cube: Excel spreadsheet, cat. no. 2033.0.55.001). Retrieved from <http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011> (last accessed 19 September 2017).
Bååth, R. (2010). ChildFreq: an online tool to explore word frequencies in child language. Lucs Minor, 16, 16.
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S., & Christophe, A. (2007). Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development, 3(4), 325–41.
Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 4593.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0.18. Available at <http://www.praat.org/>.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
Budziszewski, P. (2003). Serenity Engine [computer software]. Sydney, NSW: Toybox Labs.
Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(5), 1029–37.
Crawford, W. J. (2005). Verb agreement and disagreement: a corpus investigation of concord variation in existential there + be constructions. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 3561.
Davies, B., Xu Rattanasone, N., & Demuth, K. (2017). Two-year-olds’ sensitivity to inflectional plural morphology: allomorphic effects. Language Learning and Development, 13(1), 3853.
Davies, B., Xu Rattanasone, N., Schembri, T., & Demuth, K. (2019). Preschoolers’ developing comprehension of the plural: the effects of number and allomorphic variation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 185, 95108.
de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(3), 267–78.
de Villiers, J. G., & Johnson, V. E. (2007). The information in third-person /s/: acquisition across dialects of American English. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 133–58.
Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2018). Sensitivity to morphosyntactic information in preschool children with and without developmental language disorder: a follow-up study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 3064–74.
Deevy, P., Leonard, L. B., & Marchman, V. A. (2017). Sensitivity to morphosyntactic information in 3-year-old children with typical language development: a feasibility study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(3), 668–74.
Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92, 333–75.
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 2345.
Harrington, J., Cox, F., & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 155–84.
Hay, J., & Schreier, D. (2004). Reversing the trajectory of language change: subject–verb agreement with be in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change, 16(3), 209–35.
Johnson, V. E., de Villiers, J. G., & Seymour, H. N. (2005). Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular /s/. First Language, 25(3), 317–30.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–56.
Koehlinger, K., Owen Van Horne, A. J., Oleson, J., McCreery, R., & Moeller, M. P. (2015). The role of sentence position, allomorph, and morpheme type on accurate use of s-related morphemes by children who are hard of hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(2), 396409.
Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English number marking: the singular–plural distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 125.
Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T. (2010). Comprehension of infrequent subject–verb agreement forms: evidence from French-learning children. Child Development, 81(6), 1859–75.
Legendre, G., Culbertson, J., Zaroukian, E., Hsin, L., Barrière, I., & Nazzi, T. (2014). Is children's comprehension of subject–verb agreement universally late? Comparative evidence from French, English, and Spanish. Lingua, 144, 2139.
Lenth, R. (2019). Emmeans package: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. Online <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans>.
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193–8.
Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2003). Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition, 87(3), 151–78.
Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. (2016). Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns. Cognition, 146, 349–70.
Lukyanenko, C., & Miller, K. (2018). Children's and adults’ processing of variable agreement patterns: agreement neutralization in English. In Proceedings of the 42nd Boston University Conference on Language Development, 15. Online <http://www.lingref.com/bucld/42/BUCLD42-37.pdf>.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk: Volume I: Transcription format and programs, volume II: The database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake–but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–7.
McGuckian, M., & Henry, A. (2007). The grammatical morpheme deficit in moderate hearing impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(s1), 1736.
Meechan, M., & Foley, M. (1994). On resolving disagreement: linguistic theory and variation – there's bridges. Language Variation and Change, 6(1), 6385.
Naigles, L. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86(2), 157–99.
Pohlert, T. (2014). The pairwise multiple comparison of mean ranks package (PMCMR). Online <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMR>.
R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Smit, A. B., Hand, L., Freilinger, J. J., Bernthal, J. E., & Bird, A. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(4), 779–98.
Soderstrom, M., White, K. S., Conwell, E., & Morgan, J. L. (2007). Receptive grammatical knowledge of familiar content words and inflection in 16-month-olds. Infancy, 12(1), 129.
Sundara, M., Demuth, K., & Kuhl, P. K. (2011). Sentence-position effects on children's perception and production of English third person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 5571.
Waxman, S. R., & Booth, A. E. (2001). Seeing pink elephants: fourteen-month-olds’ interpretations of novel nouns and adjectives. Cognitive Psychology, 43(3), 217–42.
Wood, J. N., Kouider, S., & Carey, S. (2009). Acquisition of singular–plural morphology. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 202–6.
Xu Rattanasone, N., Davies, B., Schembri, T., Andronos, F., & Demuth, K. (2016). The iPad as a research tool for the understanding of English plurals by English, Chinese, and other L1 speaking 3- and 4-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01773
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2011). PLS-5: preschool language scale-5 [measurement instrument]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Keywords

Comprehension of the copula: preschoolers (and sometimes adults) ignore subject–verb agreement during sentence processing

  • Benjamin DAVIES (a1), Nan XU RATTANASONE (a1) and Katherine DEMUTH (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed