Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T04:50:51.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Children's acquisition of speech timing in English: a comparative study of voice onset time and final syllable vowel lengthening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1997

DAVID SNOW
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle

Abstract

This study describes English-speaking children's acquisition of voice onset time (VOT), a segmental feature that specifies the timing of word-initial stop consonants, and final-syllable vowel lengthening (FSVL), a suprasegmental feature that influences the timing of vowels. The purpose of the study was to evaluate two hypotheses about the acquisition of speech timing contrasts: a ‘motoric’ hypothesis predicting that children would control the vowel duration contrast earlier than the consonantal one (FSVL before VOT), and a ‘representation’ hypothesis predicting that children would control the contrast represented on the segmental level of linguistic description earlier than the contrast represented on the suprasegmental level (VOT before FSVL). Longitudinal acquisition patterns for both contrasts were compared in ten children between the mean ages of 1;6 and 2;0. The results, indicating that English-speaking children usually acquired VOT before FSVL, are discussed in light of evidence that French-speaking children acquire analogous contrasts in the opposite sequence. The crosslanguage comparisons support limited forms of both the motoric and representation hypotheses. As promising topics for further study, the results also suggested the importance of individual differences, and the variability of timing features in the input.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research is based on the author's doctoral dissertation study at the University of Washington. The work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (Grant No. DC00520) awarded to Carol Stoel-Gammon, and by an Institutional National Research Service Award, NIH Grant No. 1 T32 DC00033-01, ‘Research Training in Speech and Hearing Sciences’ (University of Washington, Fred D. Minifie, Project Director), supported by the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders. Portions of this study were reported at the 10th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Providence, RI, 1996. I would especially like to thank Carol Stoel-Gammon for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Thanks to Suzanne Quigley and Patrick Feeney for assistance with the audiometric screenings. Special thanks also to Margaret Kehoe and Kresent Gurtler for their contributions to the reliability portion of the study.