Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:25:00.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anaphora and branching direction in Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

William O'Grady ,
Sook Whan Cho  and
Yutaka Sato
William O'Grady*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Sook Whan Cho
Affiliation:
Sogang University
Yutaka Sato
Affiliation:
Hokkaido University
*
Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper constitutes a response to Lust & Mazuka's (1989) defence of the Principal Branching Direction parameter and their critique of O'Grady, Suzuki-Wei & Cho's (1986) experiment, which purported to show that even children learning left-branching languages exhibit a preference for forward patterns of anaphora. Results of new experimental work with children learning Japanese are reported and shown to support the claim that there is a universal preference for forward patterns of anaphora in the early stages of language acquisition.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 473 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

In preparing this paper and doing the statistical analysis of our results, we benefited greatly from the advice and assistance provided by Craig Chaudron, Steven Ross and C.-H. Chung. We also wish to express our gratitude to Mrs Kimiko Yamamoto, who conducted the experiments in Tokyo. An earlier pilot study was conducted at the Rainbow Gakuen, a Japanese-language school in Honolulu; we thank the principal, staff and children of the Rainbow Gakuen for their help and co-operation. Finally, we thank two anonymous referees for their helpful and perceptive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Kuno, S. (1978). Japanese: a characteristic OV language. In Lehman, W. P. (ed.), Syntactictypology. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1981). Constraints on anaphora in child language: a prediction for a universal. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1983). On the notion ‘Principal Branching Direction’: a parameter in Universal Grammar. In Otsu, Y. et al. (eds), Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University.Google Scholar
Lust, B. & Lee, K. (1988). On the first language acquisition of Korean pronominal anaphora: the roles of linearity and configuration. In E. Baek (ed.), Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lust, B. & Mazuka, R. (1989). Cross-linguistic studies of directionality in first language acquisition: the Japanese data – a response to O'Grady, Suzuki-Wei & Cho (1986). Journal of Child Language 16, 665–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, B. & Mangione, L. (1983). The Principal Branching Direction parameter in first language acquisition of anaphora. In P. Sells & C. Jones (eds), Proceedings of NELS 13. University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Wakayama, T., Snyder, W., Otani, K., Mazuka, R. & Oshima, S. (1985). Configurational factors in Japanese anaphora: Evidence from acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Mazuka, R., Wakayama, T., & Oshima, S. (1986). When is an anaphor not an anaphor? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Eisele, J. & Mazuka, R. (1992). The Binding Theory module: evidence from first language acquisition for Principle C. Language 68, 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1987). Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W., Suzuki-Wei, Y. & Cho, S. (1986). Directionality preferences in the interpretation of anaphora: data from Korean and Japanese. Journal of Child Language 13, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhart, T. (1986). Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. In Lust, B. (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora. Vol. I: Defining the constraints. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Speas, M. (1990). Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar