Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-hb754 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-01T18:48:17.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictors of early precocious talking: A prospective population study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

JEMMA SKEAT*
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Speech Pathology Department, Royal Children's Hospital
MELISSA WAKE
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne
SHEENA REILLY
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Speech Pathology Department, Royal Children's Hospital
PATRICIA EADIE
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
LESLEY BRETHERTON
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne
EDITH L. BAVIN
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University
OBIOHA C. UKOUMUNNE
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
*
Address for correspondence: Jemma Skeat, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, 2nd Floor, Gantry Building, RCH, Flemington Road, Parkville, Australia3141.

Abstract

This study examines potential predictors of ‘precocious talking’ (expressive language ⩾90th percentile) at one and two years of age, and of ‘stability’ in precocious talking across both time periods, drawing on data from a prospective community cohort comprising over 1,800 children. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between precocious talking and the following potential predictors: gender, birth order, birth weight, non-English speaking background, socioeconomic status, maternal age, maternal mental health scores, and vocabulary and educational attainment of parents. The strongest predictors of precocity (being female and having a younger mother) warrant further exploration. Overall, however, it appears that precocity in early vocabulary development is not strongly influenced by the variables examined, which together explained just 2·6% and 1% of the variation at 1 ; 0 and 2 ; 0 respectively.

Type
Brief Research Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The ELVS study is supported by Project Grant 237106 from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and small grants from the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and the Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University. Authors JS and OCU each hold a NHMRC training fellowship (Capacity Building Grant in Population Health # 436914). Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children's Hospital (#23081) and La Trobe University (#03-32).

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Dale, P. S. & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds), Handbook of child language, 96151. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bavin, E. L., Prior, M., Reilly, S., Bretherton, L., Williams, J., Eadie, P., Barrett, Y. & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2008). The Early Language in Victoria Study: predicting vocabulary at age one and two years from gesture and object use. Journal of Child Language 35, 687701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain-Thorenson, C. & Dale, P. S. (1992). Do early talkers become early readers? Linguistic precocity, preschool language, and emergent literacy. Developmental Psychology 28(3), 421–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P., Simonoff, E., Bishop, D. V. M., Eley, T., Oliver, B., Price, T., et al. (1998). Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children. Nature Neuroscience 1, 324–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Stavola, B. L., Nitsch, D., dos Santos Silva, I., McCormack, V., Hardy, R., Mann, V., Cole, T. J., Morton, S. & Leon, D. A. (2006). Statistical issues in life course epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 163, 8496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, H. M., Dollaghan, C. A., Campbell, T. F., Kurs-Lasky, M., Janosky, J. E. & Paradise, J. L. (2000). Measurement properties of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development 71(2), 310–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59(5).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories user's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., deB Edwardes, M. D. & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using Generalized Estimating Equations: an orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology 157, 364–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, R. & Mroczek, D. (1994). Final version of our non-specific psychological distress scale (Memo). Ann Arbour, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
McCue Horwitz, S., Irwin, J. R., Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Bosson Heenan, J. M., Mendoza, J. & Carter, A. S. (2003). Language delay in a community cohort of young children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 42(8), 932–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, K. K., Sheng, L. & Smith, B. (2005). The precocious two-year-old: status of the lexicon and links to the grammar. Journal of Child Language 32, 563–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H. D., Nygren, P., Walker, M. & Panoscha, R. (2006). Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics 117, 298319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C. (1997). Mill Hill vocabulary scale. Oxford: JC Raven Ltd.Google Scholar
Reilly, S., Eadie, P., Bavin, E. L., Wake, M., Prior, M., Williams, J., Bretherton, L., Barrett, Y. & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2006). Growth of infant communication between 8 and 12 months: A population study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 42, 764–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, S., Wake, M., Bavin, E. L., Prior, M., Williams, J., Bretherton, L., Eadie, P., Barrett, Y. & Ukoumunne, O. C. (2007). Predicting language at age 2 years: A prospective community study. Pediatrics 120, e1441e1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N. M., Dale, P. S. & Landesman, S. (1990). Validity of Stanford-Binet IV with linguistically precocious toddlers. Intelligence 14, 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royston, P., Ambler, G. & Sauerbrei, W. (1999). The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology 28, 964–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp (2005). Stata Statistical Software (Version 9.2). College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
Thal, D. J., Bates, E., Goodman, J. & Jahn-Samilo, J. (1997). Continuity of language abilities: An exploratory study of late- and early- talking toddlers. Developmental Neuropsychology 13(3), 239–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, J., Smith, E. & Zhang, X. (1997). Epidemiology of specific language impairment: Prenatal and perinatal risk factors. Journal of Communication Disorders 30(4), 325–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed