Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:35:34.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peers and Parliamentarians versus Jacobites and Jacobins: Eighteenth-Century Stability? - Aristocratic Century: The Peerage of Eighteenth-Century England. By John Cannon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Pp. x + 193. $34.50 (cloth). - British Parliamentary Parties, 1742–1832: From the Fall of Walpole to the First Reform Act. By Brian W. Hill. London: Allen & Unwin, 1985. Pp. x + 272. $28.00 (cloth); $9.50 (paper). - Britain in the Age of Walpole. Edited by Jeremy Black. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1984. Pp. viii + 260. $27.95 (cloth). - British Radicalism and the French Revolution, 1789–1815. By H. T. Dickinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985. Pp. viii + 88. $6.95 (paper).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

John A. Phillips*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Clark, J. C. D., The Dynamics of Change (Cambridge, 1982), p. 458CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Hill, B. W., The Growth of Parliamentary Parties, 1689–1742 (London, 1976)Google Scholar.

3 Christie, Ian, Stress and Stability in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

4 Cannon, John, “The Isthmus Repaired: The Resurgence of the English Aristocracy, 1660–1760,” Proceedings of the British Academy 68 (1982): 431–53Google Scholar.

5 Bonfleld, Lloyd, Marriage Settlements, 1601–1740 (Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar; English, Barbara and Saville, John, “Comment on Bonfield's ‘Marriage Settlements and the “Rise of the Gentry,”’Economic History Review 33 (1980): 556–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Black, Jeremy, “Foreign Policy in the Age of Walpole,” in Black, Jeremy, ed., Britain in the Age of Walpole, pp. 137–38Google Scholar.

7 SirSmith, Thomas, De Republica Anglorum (London, 1583), p. 30Google Scholar.

8 Habakkuk, H. J., “England,” in The European Nobility in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Goodwin, A. (London, 1953)Google Scholar.

9 One of Northampton's seats, e.g., is listed as controlled by Earl Northampton in 1784. This ascription is defensible given the return of the earl's eldest son in each election between 1784 and 1796, but even Cannon admits the problem with counting such a populous constituency with unpredictable habits among those in the pocket of some peer.

10 Cruikshanks, Eveline, “The Political Management of Sir Robert Walpole,” in Black, , ed., p. 43Google Scholar; Cannon, John, Aristocratic Century, p. 117Google Scholar.

11 Stone, Lawrence, “The New Eighteenth Century,” New York Review of Books (March 24, 1984), p. 42Google Scholar.

12 Szechi, Daniel, Jacobitism and Tory Politics, 1710–14 (Edinburgh, 1985)Google Scholar; Bennett, G. V., The Tory Crisis in Church and State, 1688–1730 (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar.

13 Clark, J. C. D., “The Politics of the Excluded: Tories, Jacobites and Whig Patriots, 1715–60,” Parliamentary History 2 (1983): 214–15Google Scholar.

14 Lenman, Bruce, “A Client Society: Scotland between the '15 and the '45,” in Black, , ed., p. 69Google Scholar.

15 Cockburn, Lord, Memorials of His Time (London, 1856), p. 50Google Scholar.

16 Burke, Edmund, Works (London, 1848), 5:189Google Scholar.

17 British Library, Additional MS 27,827, fol. 44.

18 Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1968), p. 160Google Scholar.

19 Quoted in Hill, Brian W., British Parliamentary Politics, p. 174Google Scholar.

20 For the most recent statement in this continuing dispute, see Linebaugh, Peter, “(Marxist) Social History and (Conservative) Legal History: A Reply to Professor Langbein,” New York University Law Review 60 (1985): 212–43Google Scholar.