¹ Carter, Philip, Men and the Emergence of Polite Society (London, 2001)Google Scholar; Rosenberg, Caroll Smith, “The Republican Gentleman: The Race to Rhetorical Stability in the New United States,” in Masculinities in Politics and War: Gendering Modern History, ed. Dudink, Stefan, Hagemann, Karen, and Tosh, John (Manchester, 2004)Google Scholar; Davidoff, Lee and Hall, Catherine, Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle-Class, 1780–1850 (London, 1987)Google Scholar.

² Carter, Polite Society, 209.

³ Davidoff and Hall, Family Fortunes, 110.

⁴ Tosh, John, “Hegemonic Masculinity and the History of Gender,” in Dudink, , Hagemann, , and Tosh, , Masculinities in Politics and War, 55, 42Google Scholar. This is an illuminating critique of the use of the concept.

⁵ Barker-Benfield, George, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London, 1992)Google Scholar; Carter, Polite Society; Cohen, Michèle, Fashioning Masculinity: National Identity and Language in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶ Carter, Philip, “Men about Town: Representations of Foppery and Masculinity in Early Eighteenth-Century Urban Society,” in Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representations and Responsibilities, ed. Barker, Hannah and Chalus, Elaine (London, 1997), 49Google Scholar.

⁷ The Spectator, no. 433 (17 July 1712).

⁸ Cohen, Michèle, “Manliness, Effeminacy and the French: Gender and the Construction of National Character in Eighteenth-Century England,” in English Masculinities, 1660–1800, ed. Hitchcock, Tim and Cohen, Michèle (London, 1999), 50Google Scholar.

⁹ Pointon, Marcia, “The Case of the Dirty Beau,” in The Body Imaged: The Human Form of Visual Culture since the Renaissance, ed. Adler, Karen and Pointon, Marcia (Cambridge, 1993), 175–89Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Vickery, Amanda, The Gentleman's Daughter: Women's Lives in Georgian England (New Haven, CT, 1998), 217Google Scholar.

¹¹ Carter, Polite Society, 213.

¹² Tosh, John, “Gentlemanly Politeness and Manly Simplicity in Victorian England,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th ser., 12 (2002): 455–72, 455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

¹³ Morgan, Marjorie, Manners, Morals and Class in England, 1774–1858 (Basingstoke, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Curtin, Michael, “A Question of Manners: Status and Gender in Etiquette and Courtesy,” Journal of Modern History 57 (1985): 395–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁴ Carter, Polite Society.

¹⁵ Curtin, “A Question of Manners,” 409.

¹⁶ Tosh, “Gentlemanly Politeness,” 456, 458–59.

¹⁷ Carter, Polite Society.

¹⁸ Bennett, John, Letters to a Young Lady on Useful and Interesting Subjects Calculated to Improve the Heart, to Form the Manners, and Enlighten the Understanding, 2 vols. (Dublin, 1789), 2:7, 8Google Scholar. See also Cohen, Fashioning Masculinity. Pleasing has remained an essential trait (and sometimes a pathology) of females until today.

¹⁹ Fulford, Tim, Romanticism and Masculinity: Gender, Politics and Poetics in the Writings of Burke, Coleridge, Cobbett, Wordsworth, De Quincey and Hazlitt (Basingstoke, 1999), 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁰ Wahrman, Dror, “Percy's Prologue: From Gender Play to Gender Panic in Eighteenth-Century England,” Past and Present, no. 159 (1998): 113–60, 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²¹ Fulford, Romanticism and Masculinity, 9.

²² Duff, David, Romance and Revolution: Shelley and the Politics of Genre (Cambridge, 1994), 117Google Scholar.

²³ Ibid.

²⁴ Ibid.

²⁵ Ibid., 133.

²⁶ Sweet, Rosemary, Antiquaries: The Discovery of the Past in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London, 2004), 333Google Scholar. See also Frantzen, Allen J., Desire for Origins: New Language, Old English, and Teaching the New Tradition (London, 1990)Google Scholar.

²⁷ Piggott, Stuart, Ruins in a Landscape: Essays in Antiquarianism (Edinburgh, 1976), 118–19Google Scholar; Clark, Kenneth, The Gothic Revival: An Essay in the History of Taste (London, 1995), 69Google Scholar. However, Watt, James, Contesting the Gothic: Fiction, Genre and Cultural Conflict, 1764–1832 (Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, argues that it had not completely lost these associations by the turn of the nineteenth century.

²⁸ Translated into English by Susan Dobson in 1784. I owe this information to Sweet, Antiquaries, 77.

²⁹ Chandler, Alice, A Dream of Order: The Medieval Ideal in Nineteenth-Century English Literature (London, 1971), 17Google Scholar; Chapman, Raymond, The Sense of the Past in Victorian Literature (London, 1986)Google Scholar, stresses that Hurd's Letters mark a change of attitude, not just a mere revival of interest. See also Clark, The Gothic Revival, 69.

³⁰ Smiles, Sam, The Image of Antiquity: Ancient Britain and the Romantic Imagination (New Haven, CT, and London, 1994), 15Google Scholar.

³¹ Watt, Contesting the Gothic, 27–28.

³² Ibid., 27, 57.

³³ Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790; repr., Harmondsworth, 1969), 170Google Scholar; Fulford, Romanticism and Masculinity, 9. The “age of chivalry” is always “gone.” As recently as May 2004, Metro, the free tabloid newspaper distributed in the London tube, carried the headline “The Age of Chivalry Is Definitely Over” in its letters page, referring to complaints about the failure of tube passengers to offer their seats to pregnant women (19 May 2004, 13).

³⁴ Chandler, Dream of Order, 2; Vance, Norman, The Sinews of the Spirit: The Ideal of Christian Manliness in Victorian Literature and Religious Thought (Cambridge 1985), 19Google Scholar.

³⁵ The essay on “Chivalry” first appeared in the supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica, 1814.

³⁶ Vance, Sinews of the Spirit, 19.

³⁷ Langford, Paul, Englishness Identified: Manners and Character, 1650–1850 (Oxford, 2000), 245Google Scholar.

³⁸ Kidd, Colin, British Ethnicity before Nationalism (Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Piggott, Ruins in a Landscape.

³⁹ Cottrell, Sheila, “The Devil on Two Sticks: Franco-Phobia in 1803,” in Patriotism: The Making and Unmaking of British National Identity, ed. Samuel, Raphael, 3 vols. (London, 1989), 1:263Google Scholar.

⁴⁰ Colls, Robert, Identity of England (Oxford, 2002), 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sweet, Antiquaries, 153.

⁴¹ Smith, Anthony, “The ‘Golden Age’ and National Renewal,” in Myths of Nationhood, ed. Hoskins, Geoffrey and Schopflin, George (London, 1997), 39, 41Google Scholar. See also Stefan Dudink, “Masculinity, Effeminacy, Time: Conceptual Change in the Dutch Age of Democratic Revolutions,” in Dudink, Hagemann, and Tosh, Masculinities in Politics and War.

⁴² Watt, Contesting the Gothic, 46–7, 44, 57. See also Guest, Harriet, “The Wanton Muse,” in Beyond Romanticism: New Approaches to Texts and Contexts, 1780–1832, ed. Copley, Stephen and Whale, John (London, 1992)Google Scholar.

⁴³ Barczewski, Stephanie, Myth and National Identity in Nineteenth Century Britain: The Legends of King Arthur and Robin Hood (Oxford, 2000), 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁴⁴ See Pocock, J. G. A., Barbarism and Religion, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1999), 2:310–11, 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Piggott, Stuart, Ancient Britons and the Antiquarian Imagination: Ideas from the Renaissance to the Regency (London, 1989), 151Google Scholar; Rendall, Jane, “Tacitus Engendered: ‘Gothic Feminism’ and British Histories, c. 1750–1800,” in Imagining Nations, ed. Cubitt, Geoffrey (Manchester, 1998), 57–74Google Scholar.

⁴⁵ Duff, Romance and Revolution, 118.

⁴⁶ See, especially, Millar, John, “The Origin of the Distinction of Ranks” (1779), in John Millar of Glasgow, 1735–1801, ed. Lehmann, William H. (Cambridge, 1960)Google Scholar.

⁴⁷ Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, 317.

⁴⁸ Rendall, “Tacitus Engendered,” 64, 66. Rendall also shows that Scottish Enlightenment thinkers had conflicting analyses of the role of women; Sweet, Antiquaries, 193–94. Sweet also points out the links between the interest in antiquities and in chivalry (333).

⁴⁹ Sweet, Antiquaries, 194.

⁵⁰ Weinbrot, Howard, “Politics, Taste, and National Identity: Some Uses of Tacitism in Eighteenth-Century Britain,” in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, ed. Luce, J. J. and Woodman, A. J. (Princeton, NJ, 1993), 178Google Scholar. A similar process has been described by Dudink in “Masculinity, Effeminacy, Time.”

⁵¹ Weinbrot, “Politics,” 178; Cottrell, “The Devil on Two Sticks,” 265.

⁵² Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1768; repr., Edinburgh, 1966), 309Google Scholar. Men's reverence and respect for women was also a key feature of The Poems of Ossian, notes Dwyer, John, The Age of the Passions: An Interpretation of Adam Smith and Scottish Enlightenment Culture (East Linton, 1999)Google Scholar.

⁵³ Hurd, Richard, “Letters on Chivalry and Romance,” in Moral and Political Dialogues, 3 vols. (London, 1765), 3:209Google Scholar.

⁵⁴ Ferguson, Civil Society, 310–11, 200–201.

⁵⁵ Ibid., 311. See also Jane Rendall's introduction to Alexander, William, History of Women, from the Earliest Antiquity to the Present Time, 2 vols. (1781; repr., Bath, 1994), v–xxviGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁶ Gibbon, Edward, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 7 vols., ed. Bury, J. B. (London, 1907), 7:283Google Scholar.

⁵⁷ See Burke, Reflections, 171; Smith, R. J., Gothic Bequest: Medieval Institutions in British Thought, 1688–1863 (Cambridge, 1987), 119–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Siebert, Donald T., “Chivalry and Romance in the Age of Hume,” Eighteenth-Century Life 21 (1997): 62–79Google Scholar, argues that Hume and Burke are among the few who take chivalry seriously.

⁵⁸ Taylor, Barbara, “Feminists versus Gallants: Manners and Morals in Enlightenment Britain,” in Women, Gender and Enlightenment, ed. Knott, Sarah and Taylor, Barbara (Basingstoke, 2005)Google Scholar.

⁵⁹ Regarding women, politeness and chivalry are still conflated, but regarding men, they are different. Politeness in men can be associated with wimpishness, but chivalry is always manly.

⁶⁰ ReverendThomson, George, The Spirit of General History in a Series of Lectures from the Eighth to the Eighteenth Century (Carlisle, 1791), 176Google Scholar. This text is an early example of the popularization of chivalry.

⁶¹ Hurd, Moral and Political Dialogues, 1:171; Gibbon, Decline and Fall, 6:283.

⁶² Cohen, Fashioning Masculinity.

⁶³ Gibbon, Decline and Fall, 6:283.

⁶⁴ Millar, Origin, 215; see also Stuart, Gilbert, A View of Society in Europe in its Progress from Rudeness to Refinement (Edinburgh, 1778)Google Scholar; Dwyer, Age of the Passions, chap. 4.

⁶⁵ Hurd, “Letters on Chivalry.”

⁶⁶ Millar, Origin, 214; Thomson, Spirit of General History.

⁶⁷ Ferguson, Civil Society, 201.

⁶⁸ Wollstonecraft, Mary, A Vindication of the Rights of Men, ed. Tomaselli, Sylvana (1790; repr., Cambridge, 1995), 25, 179Google Scholar.

⁶⁹ Aikin, Lucy, Epistles on Women (London, 1810), 52Google Scholar.

⁷⁰ Ibid., 62.

⁷¹ Siebert, “Chivalry and Romance,” 76; Millar, Origin, 218 (my emphasis).

⁷² Watt, Contesting the Gothic, 57.

⁷³ Allen J. Frantzen argues that this connection was underplayed in the nineteenth century, stress being placed rather on chivalry's value as an instrument of reform. Bloody Good: Chivalry, Sacrifice and the Great War (Chicago, 2004), chap. 6Google Scholar.

⁷⁴ Moore, Dafydd, “Ossian, Chivalry and the Politics of Genre: The Case of Fingal King of Morven, a Knight-Errant,” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 23 (2000): 21–35, 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁵ Frantzen, Bloody Good, 149.

⁷⁶ David Hume, History of England, cited in Siebert, “Chivalry and Romance,” 69. Prestage, Edward, Chivalry: A Series of Studies to Illustrate Its Historical and Civilising Influence (London, 1928), 27Google Scholar, argues that “chivalry vanished from the practical arts of war in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries” but “lingered in education.”

⁷⁷ Cohen, Fashioning Masculinity.

⁷⁸ See Cohen, “Manliness, Effeminacy,” and Cohen, Michèle, “The Grand Tour, Language, National Identity and Masculinity,” Changing English: Studies in Reading and Culture 8, no. 2 (2001): 129–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁹ Dwyer, Age of the Passions, 87.

⁸⁰ Prestage, Chivalry.

⁸¹ See Cohen, Michèle, “The Grand Tour: Constructing the English Gentleman in Eighteenth-Century France,” History of Education 21, no. 3 (1992): 241–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁸² Hurd, Richard, Dialogues on the Uses of Foreign Travel Considered as a Part of an English Gentleman's Education: Between Lord Shaftesbury and Mr Locke (London, 1764), 105, 160Google Scholar.

⁸³ Cohen, “The Grand Tour, Language, National Identity,” and “Manliness, Effeminacy.”

⁸⁴ Graham, Catharine [Macaulay], History of England, 8 vols. (London, 1763–83), 1:xv–xviGoogle Scholar. Macaulay's argument is rooted in republicanism rather than chivalry, but, Duff notes in Romance and Revolution, the two are not incompatible.

⁸⁵ Andrews, John, Letters to a Young Gentleman on his Setting out for France (London, 1784), 4Google Scholar.

⁸⁶ Hurd, Uses of Foreign Travel, 71.

⁸⁷ Hurd, Moral and Political Dialogues, 1:176.

⁸⁸ Moore, John, MD, “View of the Commencement and Progress of Romance,” prefixed in Tobias Smollett, Works, 8 vols. (London, 1797), 1:xv–xiGoogle Scholar.

⁸⁹ Town and Country Magazine (1771), 413; Frantzen, Bloody Good, 116; Knox, Vicesimus, Liberal Education (London, 1781)Google Scholar. For concerns about the effeminacy of the military, see Wilson, Kathleen, The Sense of the People: Politics, Culture and Imperialism in England, 1715–1785 (Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar; John Bonehill, “‘A Trip to Cock Heath’: War, Fashion and Femininity in Graphic and Literary Satire of the Late Eighteenth Century” (unpublished paper).

⁹⁰ Duff, Romance and Revolution, 136; Digby, Kenelm, The Broad Stone of Honour; or, Rules for the Gentlemen of England (London, 1822)Google Scholar. Digby was the foremost expert on chivalry and its history in the nineteenth century and was admired by Wordsworth, John Ruskin, and especially Edward Burne-Jones. Frantzen, Bloody Good, 17, 131; Girouard, Mark, The Return to Camelot: Chivalry and the English Gentleman (New Haven, CT, 1981), 60Google Scholar. Girouard suggests that Baden Powell drew on the Broad Stone when he was forming the Boy Scouts.

⁹¹ Digby, Broad Stone, xi.

⁹² Ibid., 549.

⁹³ Knox, Liberal Education, 29; Barrow, William, An Essay on Education, 2 vols. (London, 1802), 2:162Google Scholar. See Cohen, Michèle, “Gender and the Public Private Debate on Education in the Long Eighteenth Century,” in Public or Private Education? Lessons from History, ed. Aldrich, Richard (London, 2004)Google ScholarPubMed.

⁹⁴ Macaulay, Catharine, Letters on Education (London, 1790), 142Google Scholar.

⁹⁵ Smith, Sydney, “Review of the Remarks on the System of Education in Public Schools,” Edinburgh Review 16 (1810): 327–29Google Scholar.

⁹⁶ Digby, Broad Stone, 549.

⁹⁷ Mills, Charles, History of Chivalry, or Knighthood and its Times, 2 vols. (London, 1825)Google Scholar.

⁹⁸ Sinfield, Alan, “The Wilde Century,” quoted in George E. Haggerty, Men in Love: Masculinity and Sexuality in the Eighteenth Century (Chichester, 1999), 5Google Scholar.

⁹⁹ Foote, Samuel, “The Englishman Returned” (1756), in The Plays of Samuel Foote, ed. Backscheider, Paula R. and Howard, D. (London, 1983)Google Scholar; Town and Country Magazine (August 1771), p. 134.

¹⁰⁰ See Cohen, “Manliness, Effeminacy.”

¹⁰¹ Moore, “Ossian, Chivalry,” 31; see Girouard, Return to Camelot.

¹⁰² Johnson, Claudia L., Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s; Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen (London, 1995), 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁰³ Butler, Marilyn, Romantics, Rebels and Reactionaries: English Literature and Its Background, 1760–1830 (Oxford, 1981), 99Google Scholar. Peter Mandler, personal communication, 2001; Hellstrom, Ward, “Francophobia in Emma,” Studies in English Literature 5 (1965): 607–17, 611 n. 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar, has argued on the other hand that “the biographical facts … appear to have no significance to the theme and the structure of the novel, nor would [Austen] care … to have Churchill associated with a favoured brother Frank.”

¹⁰⁴ Trublet, Abbé Nicolas Charles Joseph, Essays upon Several Subjects of Literature and Morality, 3 vols. (London, 1744)Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁵ Stuart, View of Society, 67.

¹⁰⁶ Fordyce, David, Dialogues concerning Education, 2 vols. (London, 1745–48), 1:43Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁷ Cohen, Fashioning Masculinity, 65.

¹⁰⁸ Ibid.

¹⁰⁹ Carter, Polite Society.

¹¹⁰ For a discussion of the meaning of knowing or not knowing French, see Cohen, Michèle, “French Conversation or ‘Glittering Gibberish’? Learning French in Eighteenth-Century England,” in Expertise Constructed: Didactic Literature in the British Atlantic World, 1500–1800, ed. Glaisyer, Natasha and Pennell, Sara (Aldershot, 2003)Google Scholar.

¹¹¹ Johnson, Equivocal Beings, 201.

¹¹² He argues that Mr. Knightley is “associated with a specific knight—St George, the patron saint of England,” while Mr. Churchill embodies the depravity of France. Hellstrom, “Francophobia,” 611; Johnson, Equivocal Beings, 201.

¹¹³ Austen, Jane, Emma (London, 2003), 305, 352, 347, 141, 56, 419, 208, 327, 128, 400, 208Google Scholar.

¹¹⁴ Carter, Polite Society.

¹¹⁵ Johnson, Equivocal Beings, 201.

¹¹⁶ Alexander, William, History of Women, From the Earliest Antiquity to the Present Time, 2 vols. (London, 1779), 1:42Google Scholar.

¹¹⁷ Aikin, Epistles, v.

¹¹⁸ Alexander, History of Women, 1:42, 43.

¹¹⁹ Hume, David, “Of Essay Writing,” in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary (1777), ed. Miller, Eugene F. (Indianapolis, 1987), 535Google Scholar.

¹²⁰ Dwyer, Age of the Passions, 92.

¹²¹ Home, Henry, Kames, Lord, “On the Progress of the Female Sex,” in Six Sketches on the History of Man (Philadelphia, 1776), 195Google Scholar.