Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:59:01.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Noblemen and Their Advisers: Consultation and Collaboration in the Later Middle Ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Carole Rawcliffe  and
Susan Flower
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the society of late medieval Europe, where power, wealth, and influence were derived from the ownership of land, the delegation of responsibility by the ruling elite became a matter of financial, administrative, and political necessity. Not only was it physically impossible for a great rentier to oversee personally routine points of organization on his estates, but the overwhelming litigiousness of contemporary life also made it essential for any property owner of note to engage the services of men practiced in the law. Furthermore, regular consultation with leading members of his following played a crucial part in determining the success—or even the survival—of the magnate in question. Just as an astute monarch recognized the importance of the deliberative process, making himself accessible to his ablest and most powerful subjects, so too the great lord had to involve his kinsmen and supporters in questions of policy and politics. In the right hands the seignorial council could, therefore, become a formidable weapon, sometimes even providing an alternative power structure to the government itself. A striking instance of this usurpation of authority is to be found in tenth-century Japan, where the administrative council of the dominant Fujiwara clan effectively superseded the central bureaucracy of the Heian state. Indeed, it was from the chambers of this body (known as the Mandokoro) that the real government of the country was carried out. The old framework was carefully preserved, and the great council of state continued to perform a ceremonial function, but, so far as practical control was concerned, the orders of the Fujiwara advisers took the place of imperial decrees.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 157 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morris, I., The World of the Shining Prince(London: Peregrine Books, 1969), pp. 65–66Google Scholar.

2 Griffiths, R. A., The Reign of King Henry VI(London: Ernest Benn, 1981), pp. 669–71Google Scholar.

3 Henry VI to the duke of York, ca. 1440, Letters of Queen Margaret of Anjou, ed. Monro, C., Camden Society, o.s., vol. 86 (London, 1863), p. 70Google Scholar.

4 Countess of Surrey to Sir John Paston, October 3, 1485, Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century, ed. Davis, N., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1971–1976), 2:444–45Google Scholar.

5 The bailiff of Yarmouth to Sir John Paston 1491, ibid., pp. 465–66.

6 In January 1414, e.g., an allowance of £18 3s. 6d. was made for the cost of liveries given at Christmas to the senior administrative staff who sat regularly on the duchy of Lancaster council. These were Hugh Mortimer, the chamberlain, John Woodhouse, the chancellor, Sir Roger Leche and Sir Walter Hungerford, stewards, respectively, of the north and the south parts of the duchy, John Leventhorpe, the receiver general, and the two auditors, Thomas Somercotes and John Bonnington (Public Record Office [PRO], DL42/17, pt. 2, fol. 6). For a general discussion of the work and membership of this body, see Somerville, R., “The Duchy of Lancaster Council and the Court of the Duchy Chamber,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th ser., 22 (1941): 159–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ellis, H., ed., “An Order made by Cardinal Wolsey, as Lord Chancellor, respecting the Management of the Affairs of the young Earl of Oxford,” Archaeologia 19 (1821): 62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Will of James Arblaster, 1492, PRO, Probate Court of Canterbury. Dogett 16.

9 British Library (BL), Cottonian MSS, Titus B XII, fols. 315–16; Cockayne, G. E., The Complete Peerage, ed. Gibbs, V.et al., 12 vols. (London, 1910–1959), 10:238Google Scholar.

10 Richard Buckland to Lord Willoughby d'Eresby, ca. 1422–32, Monro, ed., pp. 44–45.

11 John, duke of Bedford, to [Buckland], November 1432–April 1433, ibid., pp.47–48; PRO, C115/K2/6682, fols. 189–90.

12 Account of the bailiff of Wivenho, 1427–28, Essex Record Office (RO), D/DBmm.144.

13 Account of the recevier general of Edward, Lord Hastings, 1499–1500, Huntington Library (HL), Hastings MSS, HA, misc. box 10 (oversize document).

14 Account of the bailiff of Michellond, 1474–75, HL, Hastings MSS, HAM, box 74.

15 Fragment of account of the bailiff of Loughborough, 1397–89, HL, Hastings MSS, HAM, box 20; Rawcliffe, C., The Staffords, Earls of Stafford and Dukes of Buckingham, 1394–1521 (Cambridge, 1978), p. 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Court roll of the manor of Harwich, 1507, Essex RO, D/B4/38/10.

17 Page, W., ed., Victoria County History of Hertfordshire, 4 vols. (London, 1902–1914), 4:89Google Scholar

18 Pugh, T. B., ed.. The Marcher Lordships of South Wales, 1415–1536, Board of Celtic Studies, University of Wales History and Law Series, vol. 20 (Cardiff, 1963), pp. 262–75Google Scholar.

19 The Register of Edward the Black Prince, 4 vols. (London, 1930–1933), 1:96–97Google Scholar.

20 Wedgwood, J. C., Biographies of Members of the Commons House, 1439–1509 (London, 1936), p. 284Google Scholar; Somerville, R., History of the Duchy of Lancaster, 2 vols. (London, 1953–1970), 1:431Google Scholar.

21 Hope, W. H. S., “The Last Testament and Inventory of John de Vere, Thirteenth Earl of Oxford,” Archaeologia, 2d ser., 16 (1915): 318Google Scholar; Campling, A., The History of the Family of Drury (London, 1937), p. 44Google Scholar.

22 Somerville, , History of the Duchy of Lancaster, 1:426–27Google Scholar.

23 Hope, p. 319.

24 Lewer, H. W., “The Testament and Last Will of Elizabeth, Widow of John de Vere, Thirteenth Earl of Oxford,” Transactions of the Essex Archaeological Society, n.s., 20 (1933): 14Google Scholar.

25 Bindoff, S. T., ed.,The House of Commons, 1509–1558, 3 vols. (London, 1982), 3:374–75Google Scholar.

26 The size of the fee clearly reflected the status and influence of the recipient. Edward, the Black Prince, for instance, paid twenty marks per year to each of the two judges, Sir Henry Green and Sir Robert Thorpe— “in reward for the great labour and diligence which [they] must needs bestow on the Prince's business whenever matters of law are on hand”—but only 50s. to the two sergeants who acted for him in the court of Common Pleas (The Register of Edward the Black Prince, 4:132, 168–69Google Scholar).

27 Bindoff, ed., 3:192–95.

28 Ibid., 1:681–82; 3:588–90, 640–41. For an example of Wingfield and Coningsby presiding over a meeting of the de Vere council in London in 1532, see the court roll of the manor of Buttes Hall in Stapleford Abbots, 1532, Essex RO, D/DM/M172 m. 17v. Norwich was one of “the great rulers“ who supervised the fourteenth earl of Oxford's affairs (Countess of Oxford to Cardinal Wolsey, 1523, Letters and Papers Foreign and Domestic of the Reign of Henry VIII, ed. Brewer, J. S., 21 vols. [London, 1862–1910], vol. 3 pt. 2, no. 2932 [6]Google Scholar).

29 Marriage contract between Sir Walter Hungerford and William, Lord Botreaux, ca. 1420, HL, Hastings MSS, HAP, box 2.

30 Oliver, J. R., ed.,Monumenta de Insula Manniae, Manx Society, vol. 2 (Douglas, Isle of Man, 1861), pp. 208–9Google Scholar.

31 Rawcliffe (n. 15 above), pp. 146–47; account of the receiver general of the Stafford estates, 1390–91, Staffordshire RO, D641/1/2/4. It is interesting to note that, in November 1413, the regular legal staff of the duchy of Lancaster council comprised two sergeants-at-law, eight apprentices, four attorneys (at the Exchequer, Chancery, the court of King's Bench, and the court of Common Pleas), and “l'opposour del foreine extreites en l'escheqer” (PRO, DL42/17, pt. 2, fol. 2v).

32 Post, J. B., “Courts, Councils and Arbitrators in the Ladbroke Manor Dispute, 1382–1400,” in Medieval Legal Records, ed. Hunnisett, R. F. and Post, J. B. (London,1978), p. 295Google Scholar.

33 This important but hitherto largely unrecognized activity on the part of the baronage is considered more fully in Rawcliffe, C., “The Great Lord as Peacekeeper: Arbitration by English Noblemen and Their Councils in the Later Middle Ages,” in Law and Social Change in British History, ed. Guy, J. A. and Beale, H. G., Royal Historical Society Studies in History, vol. 40 (London, 1984), pp. 34–54Google Scholar.

34 Margaret of Anjou to Henry, Viscount Bourgchier, [ca. 1445–56], Munro, ed. (n. 3 above), p. 123; and Margaret of Anjou to Thomas Bawlde, [ca. 1446–60], ibid., p. 154.

35 Gairdner, J., ed., The Paston Letters, 1422–1509, 4 vols. (Edinburgh, 1910), 3:339Google Scholar.

36 Waller, W. C., “An Old Church Chest,” Transactions of the Essex Archaeological Society, n.s., 5 (1895): 2–17Google Scholar. I am grateful to E. A. Danbury for drawing my attention to this reference.

37 Rawcliffe, C., “Baronial Councils in the Later Middle Ages,” in Patronage, Pedigree and Power in Later Medieval England, ed. Ross, C. (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, 1979), pp. 92–93Google Scholar.

38 In 1423, the de Vere council actually promulgated an ordinance “with the consent of all the tenants” of Harwich in Essex that, henceforward, pleading in the manorial court was, under pain of a 100s. fine, to conform to customary law (court roll of the manor of Harwich, 1423, Essex RO, D/B/4/38/6).

39 Court roll of the manor of Wivenho, 1381, 1389, Essex RO, D/DBm m. 100. At Earl's Colne in the early fifteenth century, the illicit use of hunting dogs seems to have exercised the de Vere council, which dealt with three such cases within a single year (court roll of the manor of Earl's Colne, 1409, 1410, Essex RO, D/DPr 66).

40 Hope (n. 21 above), pp. 286, 316, 319; Majendie, S. A. A., Some Account of the Family of de Vere, the Earls of Oxford, and of Hedingham Castle in Essex (Castle Hedingham and London, 1904), p. 30Google Scholar. We are, in fact, told that the earl's obsequies were somewhat rushed because “the said Counselle and Executors were so occupied in the time by the King's commandment in many and great matters.“

41 The countess of Oxford to Cardinal Wolsey, 1523, Brewer, ed. (n. 28 above), vol. 3, pt. 2, no. 2932 (5); and the earl of Oxford to Cardinal Wolsey, 1523, ibid. (7).

42 Account of the receiver general of John, earl of Oxford, 1488–89, Essex RO, D/DPr 139; Wedgwood (n. 20 above), p. 665.

43 Indenture of 1487 for the marriage of Elizabeth Shilton with Sir Richard Fitzlewis, Essex RO, D/DP T1/1505.

44 Wedgwood (n. 20 above), p. 334; PRO, C142/28/2; Essex RO, D/DPr 139 (the stewardship brought him a fee of £6 13s. 4d. per year); BL, Additional Charter 41,711, and Harleian MS 1,541, fol. 51v.

45 Earl of Oxford to Sir John Paston, [before September 1503], Davis, ed. (n. 4 above), 2:486–87.

46 Roskell, J. S., The Commons and Their Speakers in English Parliaments, 1376–1523 (Manchester, 1965), pp. 207–8, 348–50Google Scholar.

47 Bindoff, ed. (n. 25 above), 1:516–18, 2:553–55, 3:157.

48 Historical Manuscripts Commission (HMC), 14th Report, app. 8, p. 252Google Scholar. For the background to this letter, see Rogers, A., “Parliamentary Elections in Grimsby in the Fifteenth Century,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 42 (1969): 212–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 HMC, app. 8, p. 252.

50 The earl of Oxford to Thomas de Vere, March 14, 1471, Gairdner, ed. (n. 35 above), 2:420–21.

51 The earl of Oxford to Paston, January 26, 1487, Davis, ed. (n. 4 above), pp. 448–49; two letters from the earl of Oxford to Paston, March 12, 1489, and April 30, 1489, ibid., pp. 458–60; two letters from the earl of Oxford to Paston and one from the earl of Oxford to his councillors generally, March 27, 1491, July 31, 1491, and April 10, 1491, ibid., pp. 462–64; three letters from the earl of Oxford to Paston, October 1491, ibid., pp. 466–68; the earl of Oxford to Paston and Sir Ralph Shilton, August 20, 1499, ibid., pp. 477–78; and the earl of Oxford to Paston, September 22, 1503, ibid., pp. 487.

52 Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous, 7 vols. to date (London, 1916–), vol. 7, no. 65Google Scholar.

53 Ibid., nos. 66, 78, 89.

54 Ibid., no. 101.

55 Two letters from Buckland to John, duke of Bedford, one letter from Bedford to his staff at Calais, one letter from Buckland to an unnamed correspondent, one letter from the same to Buckland, and one letter from Buckland to Richard Wydeville, Spring 1428, Munro, ed. (n. 3 above), pp. 34–43.