Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:59:52.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Convergence of Ethics: Saints and Whigs in British Antislavery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

Abraham D. Kriegel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a paradox in the legislative success of British antislavery that invites further inquiry. While one can hardly diminish the role of evangelical Christianity in the abolition of the slave trade and, decades later, of slavery in the empire, each bill was passed by an aristocratic government predominantly Whig in composition. The first measure, the abolition of the slave trade in 1807, was passed by the Ministry of All the Talents, a coalition of Foxite Whigs and Grenvillites, in a parliament that remained almost exclusively a body of the landed interest. While the first reformed parliament of 1833 may not have been quite so preponderantly landed in its composition, it abolished slavery in the empire under the leadership of Lord Grey's government, the most aristocratic of the century. Like the Talents Ministry, the government of Lord Grey was a coalition, at least in its inception. But its moving spirits were Whigs. Yet, with some few exceptions, the role of the Whigs in British antislavery has not received the attention it deserves. In particular, one must inquire how and why a group of worldly aristocrats, especially the older generation of Fox, Grey, and Holland, should have associated themselves with an evangelical crusade. Whig aristocrats, after all, subscribed to an ethic that Evangelicals disdained, particularly in its emphasis on worldly honor; and evangelical humility, in turn, often appeared to at least some Whigs as righteous humbug.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1987 , pp. 423 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Some studies about individual Whigs contain information about the network of contacts between Whig and Evangelical politicians engaged in antislavery activity. See Davis, Richard W., Dissent in Politics: The Political Life of William Smith, M.P. (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Jupp, Peter, Lord Grenville, 1759–1834 (Oxford, 1985)Google Scholar; New, Chester W., The Life of Henry Brougham to 1830 (Oxford, 1961)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Leslie, Holland House (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Stewart, Robert, Henry Brougham, 1778–1868: His Public Career (London, 1985)Google Scholar.

2 Parliamentary History (PH), 29:314, April 19, 1791 Google Scholar (Lord John Russell), and 279–81, April 18, 1791 (Col. Tarleton). Tarleton was a Foxite but an M.P. for the port city of Liverpool.

3 For example, Thomas Clarkson. See Henry Brougham to Lord John Russell (private), May [1835], Public Record Office (PRO), Russell Papers, PRO 30/22/1E/145–46.

4 See Spring, David, “Aristocracy, Social Structure, and Religion in the Early Victorian Period,” Victorian Studies 6 (March 1963): 263–80Google Scholar, and “Some Reflections on Social History in the Nineteenth Century,” Victorian Studies 4 (September 1960): 55–63 Google Scholar; and also Wasson, Ellis Archer, “The Young Whigs: Lords Althorp, Milton and Tavistock and the Whig Party, 1809–1830” (Ph.D. diss., Cambridge University, 1975)Google Scholar.

5 Lord Howick, diary, April and May 1836, Durham University, Grey Papers, C3/2.

6 Lord Chichester to Lord Morpeth, November 20, 1830, Castle Howard, York-shire, Castle Howard MSS.

7 Thomas Creevey to Elizabeth Ord, February 6, 1821, The Creevey Papers: A Selection from the Correspondence and Diaries of the Late Thomas Creevey, ed. SirMaxwell, Herbert (London, 1904), 2:12 Google Scholar.

8 Le Marchant, Denis, Memoir of Viscount Althorp, Third Earl Spencer (London, 1876), pp. xv–xvi, 33–34 Google Scholar.

9 Clive, John, Macaulay: The Shaping of the Historian (New York, 1974), p. 60 Google Scholar.

10 Lord Holland to Lord Grey, October 22, 1821. British Library (BL), Holland House Papers. Additional (Add.) MS 51546, fol. 165.

11 Edinburgh Review 11 (January 1808): 341–62Google Scholar. The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals, ed. Houghton, Walter E., I (Toronto, 1966)Google Scholar has been relied on to provide identification of authors in the numbers of the Edinburgh Review.

12 Fitzwilliam to the Reverend H. Zouch, September 2, 1787, Sheffield Central Library, Wentworth-Woodhouse MS E234/14.

13 Quoted by Thompson, E. P. in The Making of the English Working Class (New York, 1963), p. 402 Google Scholar.

14 Wilberforce, William, A Practical View of the Prevailing System of Professed Christians, in the Higher and Middle Classes, Contrasted with Real Christianity (Philadelphia, 1798), pp. 284–85Google Scholar.

15 Quoted by Furneaux, Robin in William Wilberforce (London, 1974), p. 186 Google Scholar.

16 Wilberforce, Robert Isaac and Wilberforce, Samuel, The Life of William Wilber-force (London, 1838), 3:220 Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Life). Melville was found guilty of financial mismanagement when he was first lord of the Admiralty under Pitt.

17 Edmund Burke to Fitzwilliam, November 21, 1791, The Correspondence of Edmund Burke, ed. Copeland, Thomas E. (Cambridge and Chicago, 1958–1978), 6:451 Google Scholar.

18 Skinner, Quentin, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action,” Political Theory 2 (August, 1974): 298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 The marquess of Hastings to the earl of Rawdon, July 4, 1821, Henry E. Huntington Library, Hastings Papers, HA 5227.

20 Lord Ashley, diary, January 25, 1828, The Life and Work of the Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury, by Hodder, Edwin (London, 1887), 1:80 Google Scholar.

21 William Wilberforce to Brougham, November 23, 1830, University College, London, Brougham Papers, 10969. This was a line Wilberforce used often—e.g., in Wilber-force to Morpeth, December 13, 1830, Castle Howard, Yorkshire, Castle Howard MSS; and Wilberforce to Russell, October 15, 1830, Duke University Library, Russell Papers.

22 Digby, Kenelm, The Broad Stone of Honour; or, the True Sense and Practice of Chivalry (London, 1829)Google Scholar. See the discussion by Girouard, Mark, The Return to Camelol: Chivalry and the English Gentleman (New Haven, Conn., 1981)Google Scholar, passim.

23 Quoted by Spring, David in “The Clapham Sect: Some Social and Political Aspects,” Victorian Studies 5 (September 1961): 46 Google Scholar.

24 Wilberforce to Lady Waldegrave, April 15, 1805. The Correspondence of William Wilberforce, ed. Wilberforce, Robert Isaac and Wilberforce, Samuel (1840; facsimile re-print, Miami, 1969), 2:25 Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Correspondence).

25 Chichester to Morpeth, December 4, 1830, Castle Howard, Yorkshire, Castle Howard MSS.

26 William Wilberforce, journal, August 23, 1789, Life (n. 16 above), 1:241 Google ScholarPubMed.

27 Lord Ashley, diary, April 28, 1831, Historical Manuscripts Commission, Broad-lands MS SHA/PD1.

28 James Mackintosh to Richard Sharp, July 7, 1808, BL, Mackintosh MSS, Add. MS 52451, fols. 227–30; Horner, Leonard, ed., Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Horner, 2 vols. in 1 (London, 1843), p. 340 Google Scholar; Jeffrey, Francis to Horner, Francis, November 25, 1806, Memoirs and Correspondence of Francis Horner, 2d ed. (London, 1853), 1:411 Google Scholar.

29 Wilberforce, to John Smyth, November 5, 1810, Correspondence, 2:193 Google Scholar.

30 Hannah More to Wilberforce, November 6, [1821], Duke University Library, Wilberforce MSS.

31 Thomas Sadler to Ferribee Sadler, n.d., London School of Economics, Sadler Papers, bk. 1, fol. 13.

32 Hastings to Rawdon, August 10, 1820, Henry E. Huntington Library, Hastings Papers, HA 5222.

33 Wilberforce to his son, 1819, Life, 5:25–26 Google ScholarPubMed.

34 Mackintosh to Mrs.Taylor, John, October 10, 1808, Memoirs of the Right Honourable Sir James Mackintosh, ed. Mackintosh, Robert James (London, 1836), 1:440 Google Scholar.

35 Grey to Lord Howick, December 26, 1824, Durham University, Grey Papers.

36 Life, 3:97–98; 4:340–41, 345Google ScholarPubMed.

37 Wilberforce's notes for a sequel to A Practical View … (n. 14 above), October 8, 1824, in Life, 2:403 Google ScholarPubMed.

38 Lord Ashley to London Society for Improving Condition of Factory Children, 1833, Hodder (n. 20 above), 1:154; Hume, David, “Of the Dignity or Manners of Human Nature,” in Of the Standard of Taste and Other Essays, ed. Lenz, John W. (Indianapolis, 1965), p. 145 Google Scholar; and “Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals,” in Humes Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Aiken, Henry D. (New York, 1948), pp. 181–83Google Scholar.

39 Life, 4:284 Google ScholarPubMed.

40 Zachary Macaulay to William Smith, January 31, 1815, Duke University Library, William Smith Papers.

41 Life, 3:80 Google ScholarPubMed.

42 Wilberforce, journal, ibid., [end of 1802], 3:77.

43 Elizabeth Fry, journal, May 16, [1797], Memoir of the Life of Elizabeth Fry with Extracts from Her Journal and Letters, ed. Fry, Katharine and Cresswell, Rachel Elizabeth , 2d ed. (1848; reprint, Montclair, N.J., 1974), 1:18 Google Scholar.

44 Anstey, Roger, The Atlantic Slave Trade and British Abolition. 1760–1810 (London, 1975), pp. 163–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Wilberforce, journal, Sunday, October 28, 1787, and August 23, 1789, Life, 1:149, 241 Google ScholarPubMed.

46 Hare, Augustus and Hare, Julius, Guesses at Truth by Two Brothers (London, 1871), p. 23 Google Scholar.

47 Clark, G. Kitson, The Making of Victorian England (London, 1962), pp. 20–21 Google Scholar.

48 Anstey, pp. 364–90.

49 Parliamentary Debates (PD), 2:440–59, May 30, 1804 Google Scholar; PH, 28:49, November 12, 1789, and 29:1063–64, April 1792.

50 Meacham, Standish, Henry Thornton of Clapham (Cambridge, Mass., 1964), pp. 151–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Brewer, John, Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III (London, 1976), p. 32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skinner (n. 18 above), 287–303.

52 Wilberforce's review of a defense of the slave trade in Edinburgh Review 5 (October, 1804): 241 Google ScholarPubMed; PH, 33:278, April 6, 1797, and 1384, April 3, 1798; and 29:278, April 18, 1791.

53 PD, 3d ser., 3:1455, April 15, 1831, and 13:7, May 24, 1832.

54 PH, 29:317, April 19, 1791 (Wm. Smith); PD, 2:448, May 30, 1804 (Wilberforce).

55 PH, 28:42, May 12, 1789; see also 29:278, 287–90, 320–21, April 18, 1791; and 32:757–59, February 18, 1796.

56 PH, 29:355–56, April 18, 1791.

57 PH, 32:761–62, February 18, 1796.

58 Wilberforce, to Lady Waldegrave, April 15, 1805, Correspondence, (n. 24 above), 2:26 Google Scholar.

59 PH, 29:354–55, April 18, 1791.

60 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Todd, William B. (New York, 1965), p. 49 Google Scholar.

61 Edinburgh Review 19 (November 1811): 146, 38Google Scholar (February 1823): 169, and 6 (January 1805): 338–39.

62 Edinburgh Review 4 (July 1804): 485 Google Scholar.

63 Edinburgh Review 15 (January 1810): 457 Google ScholarPubMed.

64 Wilberforce to Holland, January 2, 1807, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51820, fol. 1.

65 Mackintosh to Holland, February 23, 1805, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51653, fol. 7; Burke, p. 96.

66 Edinburgh Review 9 (January 1806 [1807]): 317–18 (Brougham)Google Scholar; PD, 2d ser., 9:350–51, May 15, 1823 (Althorp); Stephen, quoted by Brougham, in the Edinburgh Review 43 (February 1826): 414–15Google Scholar.

67 PH, 29:1061, April 2, 1792.

68 PD, 3d ser., 18:365, June 3, 1833.

69 PD, 2d ser., 9:274, May 15, 1823.

70 Anstey, Roger, “The Pattern of British Abolitionism in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” in Anti-slavery, Religion, and Reform: Essays in Memory of Roger Anstey, ed. Bolt, Christine and Drescher, Seymour (Folkestone and Hamden, Conn., 1980), pp. 21–22 Google Scholar.

71 PH, 29:344, April 19, 1791.

72 Burke, p. 6.

73 PD, 2d ser., 9:271, May 15, 1823 (Buxton), and 18:342, June 3, 1833 (Howick).

74 Edinburgh Review 41 (January 1825): 472 Google ScholarPubMed. The Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals ([n. II above], 1:466)Google Scholar lists Macaulay or Brougham as likely authors of this article. For the argument by the West India interest that evidence of an improvement in the slave's morals had to precede the grant of liberty, see PD, 2d ser., 19:1472–74, June 23, 1828 (Lord Seaford).

75 Edinburgh Review 41 (January 1825): 465 Google ScholarPubMed, and 28 (August 1817): 370–71 (Brougham).

76 PH, 33:1410, April 3, 1798.

77 PH, 29:334, April 28, 1791 (Col. Phipps).

78 SirRomilly, Samuel, Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, Written by Himself (1840; reprint, Shannon, 1971), 3:342–43Google Scholar.

79 Burke, pp. 1, 62.

80 Smith, E. A., Whig Principles and Party Politics: Earl Filzwilliam and the Whig Party, 1748–1833 (Totowa, N.J., 1975), p. 135 Google Scholar.

81 PD, 3d ser., 3:1431, April 15, 1831 (Burge); the representatives of the West India interest referred to Stanley's initial plan as a “confiscation of property” (‘Proceedings and Resolutions of the West India Body Consequent on Mr. Secretary Stanley's Communication of the Outline of the Intended Measure Respecting Slavery,” May 1833, Queen's College, Oxford University, Derby Papers, 19/4). I have to thank Lord Blake for allowing me to read the Derby Papers.

82 Macaulay, T. B. to Zachary Macaulay, August 10, 1832, The Letters of Thomas Babington Macaulay, ed. Pinney, Thomas (London, 1974–1981), 2:175 Google Scholar. In this connection, it should be noted that the claim for compensation, should property of any kind be confiscated, was put forward in the early stages of the debates on the slave trade. See PH, 29:279, April 15, 1791 (Tarleton).

83 Edinburgh Review 39 (October 1823): 122 (Brougham)Google ScholarPubMed; PD, 2d ser., 18:1034, March 6, 1828 (William Smith), and 3d ser., 19:1203–4, July 24, 1833 (Macaulay).

84 Romilly, 3:343, April 1818; for a discussion of the Whig idea of liberty, see Kriegel, Abraham D., “Liberty and Whiggery in Early Nineteenth-Century England,” Journal of Modern History 52 (June 1980): 253–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Burke, p. 91.

86 Holland's draft of “Remarks on the objections to the admission of slave's evidence,” October 1817, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51820, fols. 66–67; Holland, Lord, diary, September [1831], The Holland House Diaries: The Diary Of Henry Richard Vassal! Fox, Third Lord Holland, with Extracts from the Diary of Dr. John Allen, ed. Kriegel, Abraham D. (London, 1977), p. 56 Google Scholar.

87 Davis, David Brion, The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1975), p. 377 Google Scholar.

88 Clarkson, quoted in Edinburgh Review 39 (October 1823): 121 Google Scholar.

89 PH, 33:1410, April 3, 1798.

90 Edinburgh Review 38 (February 1823): 170 Google Scholar.

91 PD, 8:954, February 23, 1807; Edinburgh Review 5 (October 1804): 222 (Wilber-force)Google Scholar.

92 Bentham, Jeremy to O'Connell, Daniel, August 31, 1838, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John (New York, 1962), 10:598 Google Scholar.

93 Especially on the Registry Bill, initially devised by James Stephen. See Romilly, 3:178–79, June 3, [1815]. Whigs were also more aggressive in pressing the Liverpool government to incorporate restrictions on the slave trade in the postwar treaties. Lord Grenville to Holland, June 5, 1814, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51531, fol. 79.

94 PD, 3d ser., 13:60, May 24, 1832.

95 See Kriegel, Abraham D., “Edmund Burke and the Quality of Honor,” Albion 12 (1980): 345–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Edinburgh Review 6 (July 1805): 348–50Google ScholarPubMed.

97 Lord Mulgrave to Lord Goderich, March 2, 1833, BL, Ripon Papers, Add. MS 40863, fol. 32.

98 Holland [to his estate agent], October 28, 1817, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51820, fol. 65.

99 Holland to Edward Stanley, September 27, 1833, Queen's College, Oxford University, Derby Papers, 122/4.

100 “List of Apprentices and Children on Friendship and Greenwich Estates on Jan. 1, 1837,” BL, Holland House Papers Add. MS 51819, fols. 53–54.

101 PH, 33:1399, April 3, 1798; PD, 3d ser., 20:136, July 30, 1833; Mulgrave to Stanley, December 28, [1833], Queen's College, Oxford University, Derby Papers, box 131/3.

102 Burke, Edmund, “Letter to a Noble Lord,” in The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, 4th ed. (Boston, 1871), 5:211 Google Scholar.

103 Roger Anstey, “The Pattern of British Abolitionism in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries” (n. 70 above), p. 20.

104 PH, 28:61, May 12, 1789.

105 Davis, David Brion, Slavery and Human Progress (New York and Oxford, 1984), pp. 139–40Google Scholar, and The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution (n. 87 above), p. 426. For Davis's treatment of the ethic of benevolence, see The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture (Ithaca, N.Y., 1966), esp. chaps. 11 and 12Google Scholar.

106 Hutcheson, Francis, A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Glasgow, 1747), bk. 2, chap. 4, pp. 145–46Google Scholar.

107 Hume, David, “Of Parties in General,” in David Hume's Political Essays, ed. Hendel, Charles W. (New York, 1953), p. 77 Google Scholar; Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments, pt. 6, sec. 2 in Works (1811–12; reprint, Aalen, West Germany, 1963), 1:408. For a discussion of the effect of the Scottish Enlightenment on the Whigs, see Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John, That Noble Science of Politics: A Study of Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge, 1983), esp. chap. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Chitnis, Anand C., The Scottish Enlightenment and Early Victorian English Society (London, 1986)Google Scholar.

108 Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France (n. 60 above), pp. 44–45 Google Scholar.

109 Romilly (n. 78 above), 3:342–43.

110 Mackintosh, , Memoirs … (n. 34 above), 2:368 Google Scholar.

111 Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France, pp. 6, 70 Google Scholar; Edinburgh Review 41 (January 1825): 475 Google ScholarPubMed.

112 Holland to Lord Anglesey, February 10, 1832, Northern Ireland Record Office, Anglesey Papers, T1068/34/280; Grey to Sir Herbert Taylor (private), February 19, 1832, The Reform Act 1832: The Correspondence of the Late Earl Grey with His Majesty King William IV and with Sir Herbert Taylor, ed. Grey, Henry Earl (London, 1867), 2:236 Google Scholar; PD, 3d ser., 13:60, May 24, 1832 (Althorp).

113 Edinburgh Review 4 (July 1804): 482 Google Scholar.

114 PH, 29:1057, April 2, 1792; see also PD, n.s., 10:1146, March 16, 1824.

115 PD, 8:950, February 23, 1807; Edinburgh Review 41 (January 1825): 485–86Google ScholarPubMed.

116 Mulgrave to Goderich, December 17, 1832, BL, Ripon Papers, Add. MS 40862, fols. 383–84, and Mulgrave to Goderich, March 2, 1833 (private and confidential). Add MS 40863, fols. 22–35.

117 Kriegel, , “Edmund Burke and the Quality of Honor” (n. 95 above), pp. 345–46Google Scholar.

118 PD, 3d ser., 17:1215, May 14, 1833 (Stanley); Smith to Grey (draft, probably early 1833), Duke University Library, Smith Papers.

119 Mackintosh to Wilberforce, July 27, 1807, Life (n. 16 above), 3:302 Google ScholarPubMed; Mackintosh to Wilberforce, October 30, 1817, Duke University Library, Wilberforce Papers; and Romilly quoted by Davis in The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution (n. 87 above), p. 449.

120 Brougham to Holland, Saturday, January 10, 1824, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51562, fol. 41.

121 Holland to Grey, [July 15, 1815], BL, Add. MS 51545, fol. 156.

122 The duke of Bedford to Holland, January 22, 1833, and February 8, 1833, BL, Add. MS 51664, fols. 28, 31–33.

123 PH, 28:63, May 12, 1789.

124 Russell, Lord John, ed., Memorials and Correspondence of Charles James Fox (1854; reprint, New York, 1970), 2:54–55 Google Scholar.

125 Thomas Grenville to Holland, November 4, 1834, BL, Holland House Papers, Add. MS 51534, fol. 181.

126 Mackintosh to John Whishaw, August 13, 1811, BL, Mackintosh MSS, Add. MS 52452 (unfoliated).

127 Howick to Stanley (private), March 30, 1833, Queen's College, Oxford University, Derby Papers, 131/5.

128 Holland, Lord, Further Memoirs of the Whig Party, 1807–1821 (London, 1905), pp. 149–50Google Scholar.

129 Quoted by Brougham, in the Edinburgh Review 38 (October 1823): 122 Google Scholar; PD, 7:978, February 23, 1807.

130 Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modern English Society, 1780–1880 (Toronto, 1972), chap. 2Google Scholar.

131 Davis, , The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution (n. 87 above), pp. 347–49Google Scholar. These questions hardly exhaust the range of matters that Davis's brilliant work examines-see also The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture (n. 105 above), esp. on the Enlightenment, and Slavery and Human Progress (n. 105 above). See Roger Anstey's disagreement with Davis's conclusions about class in “The Historical Debate on the Abolition of the British Slave Trade,” in Liverpool, the African Slave Trade, and Abolition: Essays to Illustrate Current Knowledge and Research, Historical Society of Lancashire and Cheshire (1976), pp. 157–66Google Scholar.

132 To the various works that have noted the survival of the Victorian artistocracy in an increasingly industrialized Britain must now be added one that questions whether middle-class or bourgeois values ever triumphed at all. See Wiener, Martin, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)Google Scholar.