Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T04:37:19.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social class differences in infant mortality: the problem of competing hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Charlotte Humphrey  and
Jonathan Elford
Charlotte Humphrey
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and General Practice, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London
Jonathan Elford
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and General Practice, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

There is no agreed explanation of the social class gradient in infant mortality. The longstanding debate continues between those who favour explanations based on natural or social selection and those who stress the influence of environmental circumstances. These explanations are often presented as competing hypotheses between which it is necessary to make an absolute choice. An article which takes this approach is critically examined. It is argued that such an approach may lead to erroneous conclusions, and may divert attention away from the primary task of understanding how to bring about further improvements in the survival of infants in the manual social classes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 497 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalmers, I. (1985) Short, Black, Baird, Himsworth and social class differences in fetal and neonatal mortality rates. Br. med. J. 291, 231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole-Hamilton, I. & Lang, T. (1986) Tightening Belts: A Report of the Impact of Poverty on Food. London Food Commission, London.Google Scholar
Durward, L. (1984) Poverty in Pregnancy. Maternity Alliance, London.Google Scholar
Graham, H. (1984) Women, Health and the Family. Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.Google Scholar
Haines, F. A. & de Looy, A. E. (1986) Can I Afford the Diet?: The Effect of Low Income on People's Eating Habits with Particular Reference to Groups at Risk. British Dietetic Association, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Hall, M. H. et al. (1980) Is routine ante-natal care worthwhile? Lancet, ii, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F. & Ridge, J. M. (1980) Origins and Destinations: Family Class and Education in Modern Britain. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Himsworth, H. (1984) Epidemiology, genetics and sociology. J. biosoc. Sci. 16, 159.Google Scholar
Knox, P. L. (1979) The accessibility of primary care to urban patients: a geographical analysis. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract. 29, 220, 160.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, C. J., Platt, S. D. & Hunt, S. M. (1987) Housing conditions and ill health. Br. med. J. 294, 1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1977) Household Food Consumption and Expenditure 1976. Annual Report of the National Food Survey Committee. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Murie, A. (1983) Why does housing inequality matter? In: Housing Inequality and Deprivation. Studies in Deprivation and Disadvantage No. 7. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1987) Infant and Perinatal Mortality. Monitor DH3/87/3.HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1987) Social factors and disease: the medical perspective. Br. med. J. 294, 881.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. H. C. (1923) The social distribution of mortality from four different causes in England and Wales, 1910–1912. Biometrika, 15, 382.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. & Davidson, N. (1982) Inequalities in Health: The Black Report. Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Tudor, Hart J. (1971) The inverse care law. Lancet, i, 405.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. (1986) Occupational class, selection and inequalities in health: a reply to Raymond Illsley. Q. J. social Affairs, 2, 415.Google Scholar