Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Is economic inequality in family planning in India associated with the private sector?

  • Abhishek Kumar (a1), Anrudh K. Jain (a2), Kumudha Aruldas (a1), Arupendra Mozumdar (a1), Ankita Shukla (a1), Rajib Acharya (a1), Faujdar Ram (a3) and Niranjan Saggurti (a1)...

Abstract

This study examined the pattern of economic disparity in the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) among women receiving contraceptives from the public and private health sectors in India, using data from all four rounds of the National Family Health Survey conducted between 1992–93 and 2015–16. The mCPR was measured for currently married women aged 15–49 years. A concentration index was calculated and a pooled binary logistic regression analysis conducted to assess economic disparity (by household wealth quintiles) in modern contraceptive use between the public and private health sectors. The analyses were stratified by rural–urban place of residence. The results indicated that mCPR had increased in India over time. However, in 2015–16 only half of women – 48% (33% from the public sector, 12% from the private sector, 3% from other sources) – were using any modern contraceptive in India. Over time, the economic disparity in modern contraceptive use reduced across both public and private health sectors. However, the extent of the disparity was greater when women obtained the services from the private sector: the value of the concentration index for mCPR was 0.429 when obtained from the private sector and 0.133 when from the public sector in 2015–16. Multivariate analysis confirmed a similar pattern of the economic disparity across public and private sectors. Economic disparity in the mCPR has reduced considerably in India. While the economic disparity in 2015–16 was minimal among those accessing contraceptives from the public sector, it continued to exist among those receiving services from the private sector. While taking appropriate steps to plan and monitor private sector services for family planning, continued and increased engagement of public providers in the family planning programme in India is required to further reduce the economic disparity among those accessing contraceptive services from the private sector.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: abhi85_iips@rediffmail.com

References

Hide All
Agha, S and Do, M (2008) Does an expansion in private sector contraceptive supply increase inequality in modern contraceptive use? Health Policy and Planning 23(6), 465475.
Bertrand, JT, Hardee, K, Magnani, RJ and Marcia, AA (1995) Access, quality of care and medical barriers in family planning programs. International Family Planning Perspectives 21, 6469 & 74.
Campbell, MN, Sahin-Hodoglugil, N and Potts, M (2006) Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning 37, 8798.
Campbell, OMR, Benova, L, Macleod, D, et al. (2015) Who, What, Where: an analysis of private sector family planning provision in 57 low- and middle-income countries. Tropical Medicine and International Health 20, 16391656.
Chalasani, S (2012) Understanding wealth-based inequalities in child health in India: a decomposition approach. Social Science & Medicine 75, 21602169.
Chaurasia, AR (2014) Contraceptive use in india: a data mining approach. International Journal of Population Research 2014, 821436.
Ciszewski, RL and Harvey, PD (1995) Contraceptive price changes: the impact on sales in Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives 21, 150154.
Creanga, AA, Gillespie, D, Karklins, S and Tsui, AO (2011) Low use of contraception among poor women in Africa: an equity issue. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89, 258266.
Derek, O, Amy, C and Farooq, U (2015) Universal sustainable development goals: understanding the transformational challenge for developed countries. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_-_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf.
Filmer, D and Pritchett, LH (2001) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data– or tears: an application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography 38, 115132.
Gakidou, E and Vayena, E (2007) Use of modern contraception by the poor is falling behind. PLoS Medicine 4, e31.
Gillespie, D, Ahmed, S, Tsui, A and Radloff, S (2007) Unwanted fertility among the poor: an inequity? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85, 100107.
Gwatkin, DR, Rutstein, S, Johnson, K, et al. (2007) Socio-Economic Differences in Health, Nutrition, and Population within Developing Countries: An Overview. Country reports on HNP and poverty. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Hamid, S and Stephenson, R (2006) Provider and health facility influences on contraceptive adoption in urban Pakistan. International Family Planning Perspectives 32, 7178.
Harvey, PD (1994) The impact of condom prices on sales in social marketing programs. Studies in Family Planning 25, 5258.
Hotchkiss, DR, Godha, D and Do, M (2011) Effect of an expansion in private sector provision of contraceptive supplies on horizontal inequity in modern contraceptive use: evidence from Africa and Asia. International Journal for Equity in Health 10, 33.
Hutchinson, PL, Do, M and Agha, S (2011) Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana. BMC Health Services Research 11, 203.
IIPS (2010) District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08. International Institute for Population Sciences, India.
IIPS and ICF (2017) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
IIPS and ORC Macro (1995) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-1), 1992–93: India. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
IIPS and ORC Macro (2000) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
IIPS and ORC Macro (2007) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India, Vol.1. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Jain, AK (1989) Fertility reduction and the quality of family-planning services. Studies in Family Planning 20, 116.
Jain, AK and Bruce, J (1994) A reproductive health approach to the objectives and assessment of family planning programs. In Sen, G, Germaine, A, and Chen, LC (eds) Population Policies Reconsidered: Health Empowerment and Rights. Harvard University Press, Boston, pp. 92211.
Jain, ML, Chauhan, M and Talwar, B (2016) Role of private sector in family planning program in Rajasthan, India– a rapid assessment. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 3, 869874.
Jensen, ER, Kak, N, Satjawinata, K, Wirawan, DD and Nangoy, N (1994) Contraceptive pricing and prevalence: family planning self-sufficiency in Indonesia. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 9, 349359.
Karen, F, Karra, M and Pandit-Rajani, T (2010) Disentangling the Effects of Poverty and Place of Residence for Strategic Planning. Futures Group Health Policy Initiative, Task Order 1, Washington, DC.
Keesara, RS, Pamela, AJ and Cynthia, CH (2015) Why do women choose private over public facilities for family planning services? A qualitative study of post-partum women in an informal urban settlement in Kenya. BMC Health Services Research 15, 335.
Kumar, A, Kumari, D and Singh, A (2014) Increasing socioeconomic inequality in childhood undernutrition in urban India: trends between 1992–93, 1998–99 and 2005–06. Health Policy and Planning 30(8), 10031016.
Levin, A, Amin, A and Rahman, A, et al. (1999) Cost-effectiveness of family planning and maternal health service delivery strategies in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 14, 219233.
Mehata, S, Paudel, Y, Dotel, B, et al. (2014) Inequalities in the use of family planning in rural Nepal. BioMed Research International. Article ID 636439. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/636439.
Mohanty, SK (2012) Multiple deprivation and maternal care in India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38, 614.
Mohanty, SK and Pathak, PK (2009) Rich–poor gap in utilization of reproductive and child health services in India, 1992–2005. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 381398.
MOHFW (1996) Target-Free Approach in Family Welfare Program. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.
MOHFW (2000) National Population Policy. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India, New Delhi.
MOHFW (2016) Annual Report 2015–16. Department of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.
Montgomery, MR, Gragnolati, M, Burke, KA and Paredes, E (2000) Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography 37, 155174.
O’Donnell, O, Doorslaer, EV, Wagstaff, A and Lindelow, M (2008) Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and their Implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Pachauri, S (1996) A shift from family planning to reproductive health: new challenges. In: Srinivasan, K (ed.) Population Policy and Reproductive Health. Population Foundation of India, New Delhi.
Pachauri, S (2014) Priority strategies for India’s family planning programme. Indian Journal of Medical Research 140, S137S146.
Pathak, PK, Singh, A and Subramanian, S (2010) Economic inequalities in maternal health care: prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992–2006. PLoS One 5, e13593.
RamaRao, S, Lacuesta, M, Costello, M, Pangolibay, B and Jones, H (2003) The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. International Family Planning Perspectives 29, 7683.
Rosen, JE and Conly, S (1999) Getting Down to Business: Expanding the Private Commercial Sector’s Role in Meeting Reproductive Health Needs. Population Action International, Washington, DC.
Rutstein, SO and Johnson, K (2004) The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. ORC Macro, Measure DHS, Calverton, MD.
Singh, A, Padmadas, SS, Mishra, US, et al. (2012) Socio-economic inequalities in the use of postnatal care in India. PLoS One 7e37037.
Singh, S, Shekhar, C, Acharya, R, et al. (2018) The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015. Lancet Global Health 6, e111e120.
Thyagarajan, S, Reji, B and Viswan, SP (2014) Determinants of contraceptive usage in India. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies 1, 8897.
UNFPA (2012) A Decade of Change in Contraceptive Use in Ethiopia. UNFPA, New York.
Valekar, S, Chawla, P, Tukaram, H, Fernandez, K and Kalra, K (2017) The socio-demographic determinants of contraceptive use among rural women in reproductive age group. Journal of Women’s Health Care 6, 355.
Vyas, S and Kumaranayake, L (2006) Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning 21, 459468.
Wagstaff, A and Doorslaer, VE (2004) Overall versus socioeconomic health inequality: a measurement framework and two empirical illustrations. Health Economics 13, 297301.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed