Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:07:14.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors influencing menstrual regulation and its socioeconomic inequalities among ever-married women in Bangladesh: Findings from a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2022

Satyajit Kundu*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Patuakhali, 8602, Bangladesh and School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China

Abstract

Despite a significant drop in maternal mortality in Bangladesh, unsafe abortion remains a critical maternal health issue that could be reduced by promoting menstrual regulation (MR). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of MR use among ever-married women as well as to identify the socioeconomic inequalities in MR use in Bangladesh. The latest Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18 data were used in this study. We used a sub-sample of 12,586 ever-married women aged 15 to 49 years for this study. To identify the determinants of MR, multilevel (mixed-effect) binary logistic regression analysis was used while accounting for potential between-clusters variations. The weighted prevalence of MR was 7.64% (95% CI: 7.19 - 8.12). Women of aged 20-29 years (AOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.46, 4.30) and ≥ 30 years (AOR: 4.17, 95% CI: 2.39, 7.26), from urban areas (AOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.47), having one or two children (AOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.25, 3.09) and ≥ 3 children (AOR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.40, 3.65), who used traditional contraceptive method (AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.73), and from Barishal division (AOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.93) were more likely to have MR. Women were less likely to have MR if they were from Chittagong (AOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.84) and Mymensingh (AOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.73) divisions. MR use was found to be higher among higher socioeconomic status (SES) groups as the concentration index (CIX) value was positive and the Lorenz curve lay below the line of equality (CIX: 0.095, p<0.001). Health policy and intervention design should prioritize minimizing socioeconomic inequities concerning MR services.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adato, M, Roopnaraine, T, and Becker, E (2011) Understanding use of health services in conditional cash transfer programs: insights from qualitative research in Latin America and Turkey. Social Science & Medicine 72(12), 19211929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alam, MZ, and Sultan, S (2019) Knowledge and practice of menstrual regulation (MR) in Bangladesh: Patterns and determinants. Journal of Population and Social Studies 27(3), 220231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankara, HG (2017) Socioeconomic variations in induced abortion in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science 49(1), 99122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, J, Andersen, K, and Samandari, G (2011) Reductions in abortion-related mortality following policy reform: evidence from Romania, South Africa and Bangladesh. Reproductive Health 8(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bose, S, and Trent, K (2006) Socio-demographic determinants of abortion in India: a north–south comparison. Journal of Biosocial Science 38(2), 261282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DaVanzo, J, and Rahman, M (2014) Pregnancy termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: trends and correlates of use of safer and less-safe methods. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(3), 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DaVanzo, J, Rahman, M, Ahmed, S, and Razzaque, A (2013) Influences on pregnancy-termination decisions in Matlab, Bangladesh. Demography 50(5), 17391764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhar, S (2021) No TitleDistrict-wise Literacy Performance. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.daily-sun.com/printversion/details/588596/Districtwise-Literacy-Performance- Google Scholar
Ekholuenetale, M, Mistry, SK, Chimoriya, R, Nash, S, Doyizode, AM, and Arora, A (2021) Socioeconomic inequalities in early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding practices in Bangladesh: findings from the 2018 demographic and health survey. International Breastfeeding Journal 16(1), 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekholuenetale, M, Tudeme, G, Onikan, A, and Ekholuenetale, CE (2020) Socioeconomic inequalities in hidden hunger, undernutrition, and overweight among under-five children in 35 sub-Saharan Africa countries. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 95(1), 115.Google ScholarPubMed
El Arifeen, S, Hill, K, Ahsan, KZ, Jamil, K, Nahar, Q, and Streatfield, PK (2014) Maternal mortality in Bangladesh: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. The Lancet 384(9951), 13661374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil-Lacruz, AI, Gil-Lacruz, M, and Bernal-Cuenca, E (2012) Socio-economic determinants of abortion rates. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9(2), 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttmacher Institute (2012) Menstrual regulation and induced abortion in Bangladesh. Retrieved March 20, 2022, from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/factsheet/menstrual-regulation-unsafe-abortion-bangladesh.pdf Google Scholar
Guttmacher Institute (2017) Menstrual Regulation and Unsafe Abortion in Bangladesh. Retrieved March 20, 2022, from https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/menstrual-regulation-unsafe-abortion-bangladesh Google Scholar
Hossain, A, Maddow-Zimet, I, Ingerick, M, Bhuiyan, HU, Vlassoff, M, and Singh, S (2017) Access to and quality of menstrual regulation and postabortion care in Bangladesh: evidence from a survey of health facilities, 2014.Google Scholar
Hossain, A, Moseson, H, Raifman, S, Gerdts, C, Biswas, KK, and Foster, DG (2016) ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health 13(1), 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hossain, MB, Khan, MHR, Ababneh, F, and Shaw, JEH (2018) Identifying factors influencing contraceptive use in Bangladesh: evidence from BDHS 2014 data. BMC Public Health 18(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jann, B (2016) Estimating Lorenz and concentration curves. The Stata Journal 16(4), 837866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, HB, Schurmann, A, Oliveras, E, and Akhter, HH (2011) Scaled up and marginalized: a review of Bangladesh’s menstrual regulation programme and its impact. Social Determinants Approaches to Public Health: From Concept to Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Kant, S, Srivastava, R, Rai, SK, Misra, P, Charlette, L, and Pandav, CS (2015) Induced abortion in villages of Ballabgarh HDSS: rates, trends, causes and determinants. Reproductive Health 12(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapil Ahmed, M, Van Ginneken, J, and Razzaque, A (2005) Factors associated with adolescent abortion in a rural area of Bangladesh. Tropical Medicine & International Health 10(2), 198205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, HR, and Shaw, E (2011) Multilevel logistic regression analysis applied to binary contraceptive prevalence data. Journal of Data Science 9, 93110.Google Scholar
Khan, MN, Islam, MM, and Islam, RM (2022) Pattern of contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women with diabetes and/or hypertension: findings from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Women’s Health 22(1), 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marie Stopes Bangladesh (2021) Safe Abortion for Every Woman (SAFE). Retrieved March 20, 2022, from https://www.mariestopes.org.bd/about/safe-abortion-for-every-woman-safe/ Google Scholar
MFS (2022) Facts about safe abortion. Retrieved July 2, 2022, from https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/what-we-do/medical-issues/safe-abortion Google Scholar
NIPORT and ICF (2020) Mitra and associates. Dhaka, Bangladesh: ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18, Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT and ICF.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, O, O’Neill, S, Van Ourti, T, and Walsh, B (2016) Conindex: estimation of concentration indices. The Stata Journal 16(1), 112138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Population control and family planning division (1979) Memo no. 5-14/ MCH-FP/Trg./M.R. Programme. Dacca: Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Population Council Bangladesh (1999) Menstrual Regulation Past, Present, and Future Challenges. Retrieved from https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/banglapolicydialogue9.pdf Google Scholar
Rahman, M, DaVanzo, J, and Razzaque, A (2014) Pregnancy termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: maternal mortality risks associated with menstrual regulation and abortion. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(3), 108118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rana, J, Sen, KK, Sultana, T, Hossain, MB, and Islam, RM (2019) Prevalence and determinants of menstrual regulation among ever-married women in Bangladesh: evidence from a national survey. Reproductive Health 16(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, A, … Alkema, L (2014) Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health 2(6), e323e333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S, Hossain, A, Maddow-Zimet, I, Vlassoff, M, Bhuiyan, HU, and Ingerick, M (2017) The incidence of menstrual regulation procedures and abortion in Bangladesh, 2014. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 43(1), 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S, Remez, L, Sedgh, G, Kwok, L, and Onda, T (2018) Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J-P (1983) Marital fertility at older ages in Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Population Studies 37(3), 433444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlassoff, M, Hossain, A, Maddow-Zimet, I, Singh, S, and Bhuiyan, HU (2012) Menstrual regulation and postabortion care in Bangladesh: factors associated with access to and quality of services. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
WHO (2012) Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems, World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO (2022) Abortion. Retrieved July 2, 2022, from https://www.who.int/health-topics/abortion#tab=tab_1 Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2020) World Health Organization BMI Classification. World Health Organization.Google Scholar