Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:26:57.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CAN MOTHERS JUDGE THE SIZE OF THEIR NEWBORN? ASSESSING THE DETERMINANTS OF A MOTHER'S PERCEPTION OF A BABY'S SIZE AT BIRTH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2011

ANDREW A. R. CHANNON
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty and Policy, University of Southampton, UK

Summary

Birth weight is known to be closely related to child health, although as many infants in developing countries are not weighed at birth and thus will not have a recorded birth weight it is difficult to use birth weight when analysing the determinants of child illness. It is common to use a proxy for birth weight instead, namely the mother's perception of the baby's size at birth. Using DHS surveys in Cambodia, Kazakhstan and Malawi the responses to this question were assessed to indicate the relationship between birth weight and mother's perception. The determinants of perception were investigated using multilevel ordinal regression to gauge if they are different for infants with and without a recorded birth weight, and to consider if there are societal or community influences on perception of size. The results indicate that mother's perception is closely linked to birth weight, although there are other influences on the classification of infants into size groups. On average, a girl of the same birth weight as a boy will be classified into a smaller size category. Likewise, infants who died by the time of the survey will be classified as smaller than similarly heavy infants who are still alive. There are significant variations in size perception between sampling districts and clusters, indicating that mothers mainly judge their child for size against a national norm. However, there is also evidence that the size of infants in the community around the newborn also has an effect on the final size perception classification. Overall the results indicate that mother's perception of size is a good proxy for birth weight in large nationally representative surveys, although care should be taken to control for societal influences on perception.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, T. (1992) Low birth weight, intrauterine growth-retarded, and pre-term infants. Human Nature 3(4), 335378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, B. & Newman, V. (1991) Small-for-gestational-age birth: maternal predictors and comparison with risk factors of spontaneous preterm delivery in the same cohort. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 164(3), 785790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Academy of Preventive Medicine [Kazakhstan] & Macro International Inc. (1999) Kazakhstan Demographic Health Survey 1999. Academy of Preventive and Macro International Inc., Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
Barker, D. (ed.) (1992) Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease. BMJ, London.Google Scholar
Blanc, A. & Wardlaw, T. (2005) Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83(3), 178185.Google Scholar
Boerma, J. T., Weinstein, K. I., Rutstein, S. O. & Sommerfelt, A. E. (1996) Data on birth weight in developing countries: can surveys help? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 74(2), 209216.Google ScholarPubMed
Central Organization for Statistics and Information Technology & Kurdistan Regional Statistics Office (2007) Iraq Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2006. Final Report.Google Scholar
Channon, A. A. R., Padmadas, S. S. & McDonald, J. W. (2011) Measuring birth weight in developing countries: does the method of reporting in retrospective surveys matter? Maternal and Child Health Journal. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-009-0553-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Vanzo, J. (1984) A household survey of child mortality determinants in Malaysia. Population and Development Review 10 (Supplement: Child Survival: Strategies for Research), 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebomoyi, E., Adetoro, O. & Wickremasinghe, A. (1991) Birthweight and sociobiological factors in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Biosocial Science 23(4), 417423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggleston, E., Tsui, A. O. & Fortney, J. (2000) Assessing survey measures of infant birth weight and birth size in Ecuador. Journal of Biosocial Science 32, 373382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, S. (2006) Indoor air pollution in India and a baby's size at birth: is there a link? Journal of World Health and Population. URL: http://www.longwoods.com/product.php?productid=18511&cat=413&page=1.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (1987) Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65(5), 663737.Google ScholarPubMed
McCormick, M. (1985) The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine 312(2), 8290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magadi, M., Agwanda, A., Obare, F. & Taffa, N. (2007) Size of newborn and Caesarean section deliveries in teenagers in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from DHS. Journal of Biosocial Science 39(2), 175187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magadi, M., Madise, N. & Diamond, I. (2001) Factors associated with unfavourable birth outcomes in Kenya. Journal of Biosocial Science 33, 199225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbuagbaw, L. & Gofin, R. (2010) Can recall of birth size be used as a measure of birthweight in Cameroon? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 24, 383389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. E., Goldman, N. & Moreno, L. (1993) An evaluation of survey data on birthweight and prematurity status. Social Biology 40(2), 131146.Google ScholarPubMed
Millman, S. R. & Cooksey, E. C. (1987) Birth weight and the effects of birth spacing and breastfeeding on infant mortality. Studies in Family Planning 18(4), 202212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, L. & Goldman, N. (1990) An assessment of survey data on birthweight. Social Science & Medicine 31(4), 491500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Statistics Directorate General for Health [Cambodia] & ORC Macro (2001) Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2000. National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health, and ORC Macro, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
National Statistical Office (Malawi) & ORC Macro (2001) Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2000. National Statistical Office and ORC Macro, Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
ORC Macro (2002) Interviewer's Manual for Use with Model B Questionnaire for Low Contraceptive Prevalence Countries. Measure DHS+ Basic Documentation No. 4. ORC Macro, Calverton, MD.Google Scholar
Rasbash, J., Healy, M., Browne, W., Cameron, B. & Charlton, C. (2010) MLwiN version 2.20. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, R. & da Costa Leite, I. (1999) Determinants of Neonatal Mortality in Brazil. Population Association of America, New York.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Sage, London.Google Scholar
StataCorp (2005) Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. StataCorp, LP, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Tomeo, C., Rich-Edwards, J., Michels, K., Berkey, C., Huneter, D., Frazier, A. L., Willett, W. & Buka, S. (1999) Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology 10, 774777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNICEF (2006) Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Manual 2005. URL: http://www.childinfo.org/files/Multiple_Indicator_Cluster_Survey_Manual_2005.pdf.Google Scholar