Skip to main content Accessibility help

Should Benefit-Cost Analysis Include a Correction for the Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation?

  • Frits Bos (a1), Thomas van der Pol (a2) and Gerbert Romijn (a3)


This paper provides an overview of theoretical, empirical, and practical arguments in favor of or against a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation (MEB). Benefit-cost analysis (BCA) should be used to compare the costs and benefits of a policy measure and its major alternatives, and whenever relevant, also to compare different ways of financing this. The best pragmatic approach is then to assume first that a policy measure is financed out of general tax revenues and then that the MEB of these taxes is broadly counterbalanced by the benefits of redistribution of these taxes. The latter assumption is consistent with the preferences for equality in a country’s current tax system. It is a simple and politically neutral assumption, and it implies that the marginal cost of public funds is equal to 1 and that no correction is needed in BCAs for the MEB. This shortcut assumption does not imply that the tax system is optimal or that BCAs should be distributionally weighted. Choosing an alternative source of financing, i.e., other than general tax revenues, should be regarded as a separate policy measure that should be analyzed separately in a BCA, including its distortionary and distributive effects.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Acemoglu, Daron, and Golosov, Michael. 2010, “Dynamic Mirrlees Taxation under Political Economy Constraints.” The Review of Economic Studies, 77: 841881.
Asian Development Bank. 2013, Cost-Benefit Analysis for Development: A Practical Guide. ADB, Philippines.
Atkinson, Anthony B., and Stern, Nicolas H.. 1974, “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods.” The Review of Economic Studies, 41: 119128.
Ballard, C. L., and D., Fullerton 1992, “Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3) 117131.
Bickel, Peter, Friedrich, Rainer, Burgess, Arnaud, and Fagiani, Patrizia. 2006. “Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines.” HEATCO (Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment, 2006), deliverable 5, EC-project HEATCO.
Boadway, Robin. 1976. “Integrating Equity and Efficiency in Applied Welfare Economics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4): 541556.
Boadway, Robin, and Keen, Michael. 1993. “Public Goods, Self-Selection and Optimal Income Taxation.” International Economic Review, 34: 463478.
Boardman, Anthony E., Greenberg, David H., Vining, Aidan R., and Weimer, David L.. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Bos, Frits. 2006. Nederlandse Collectieve Uitgaven in Historisch Perspectief. CPB Document number 109. CPB, The Hague.
Bos, Frits. 2008. “The Dutch Fiscal Framework: History, Current Practice and the Role of the CPB.” OECD Journal on Budgeting, 8(1): 748.
Bos, Frits, and Teulings, Coen. 2012. The World’s Oldest Fiscal Watchdog: CPB’s Analyses Foster Consensus on Economic Policy. CPB Discussion Paper 2007.
Bos, Frits, and Teulings, Coen. 2013. Short and Long-Term Forecasting by The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB): Science, Witchcraft or Practical Tool for Policy? OECD Journal of Budgeting, 13/1, 4556.
Bos, Frits, and Zwaneveld, Peter. 2017. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Flood-Risk Management and Water Governance in The Netherlands: An Overview of One Century. CPB Background Paper.
Burgess, David F. 2013. “Reconciling Alternative Views about the Appropriate Social Discount Rate.” Journal of Public Economics, 97: 917.
Bourguignon, FranÓois and Amedeo, Spadaro. 2012. “Tax–benefit revealed social preferences,” The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer; Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(1), pages 75108, March.
Burgess, David F., and Zerbe, Richard. 2011. “Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis.” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2: 120.
Conover, Christopher J. 2010. Congress Should Account for the Excess Burden of Taxation. Policy Analysis No. 669, October 13, 2010, CATO Institute.
Dahlby, Bev. 2008. The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De Nooij, Michiel and Carl, Koopmans. 2004. “Vergeten kosten van projecten.” ESB, 90(4442), 444445.
Diamond, P. A., and Mirrlees, J. A. 1971. “Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency.” American Economic Review, 61(1), 827.
Diamond, Peter A. 1975. “A many-person Ramsey tax rule.” Journal of Public Economics, 4(4), 335342.
European Commission. 2014. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Project. Economic Appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020.
Florio, Massimo. 2014. Applied Welfare Economics: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Projects and Policies. New York: Routledge.
Florio, Massimo, and Colautti, Sara. 2005. “A Logistic Growth Theory of Public Expenditures: A Study of Five Countries Over 100 Years.” Public Choice, 122: 355393.
Harberger, Arnold C. 1978. “On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy, 86(2): S87S120.
Harberger, Arnold C. 2007. Suggested New Steps Towards the Practical Implementation of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Working Paper.
Heaton, Paul. 2010. Hidden in Plain Sight: What Cost-of-Crime Research Can Tell Us about Investing in Police. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
Heckman, James J., Moon, Seong H., Pinto, Rodrigo, Savelyev, Peter A., and Yavitz, Adam. 2010. “The Rate of Return to the High Scope Perry Preschool Program.” Journal of Public Economics, 94, 114128.
Hendren, Nathaniel. 2014. The Inequality Deflator: Interpersonal Comparisons without a Social Welfare Function. NBER Working Paper 20351.
Jacobs, Bas, 2015. De prijs van gelijkheid. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
Jacobs, Bas. 2018. “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds is One at the Optimal Tax System.” International Tax and Public Finance, 25(4): 883912.
Jacobs, Bas, and Mooij, Ruud de. 2009a. “De marginale kosten van publieke fondsen zijn gelijk aan één.” ESB, 94: 532535.
Jacobs, Bas, and de Mooij, Ruud. 2009b. “Naschrift op: De marginale kosten van publieke fondsen zijn gelijk aan één.” ESB, 94: 669.
Jacobs, Bas, de Mooij, Ruud, and Armstrong, Alex. 2009. De prijs van de overheid, Den Haag: CPB.
Kaplow, Louis. 1996. “The Optimal Supply of Public Goods and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation.” National Tax Journal, 49(4): 513533.
Kaplow, Louis. 2004. “On the (Ir) Relevance of Distribution and Labor Supply Distortion to Public Goods Provision and Regulation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18: 159175.
Kleven, Henrik J., and Kreiner, Claus T.. 2003. The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in OECD Countries: Hours of Work versus Labor Force Participation. CESIFO Working Paper 935.
Koopmans, Carl, and Nooij, Michel de. 2009. “Reactie op: De marginale kosten van publieke fondsen zijn gelijk aan één.” ESB, 94: 605.
Little, Ian., and James, Mirrlees. 1974. Project appraisal and planning for developing countries. Basic books, New York.
Mirrlees, James A. 1971. “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies, 38: 175208.
Mishan, Ezra J., and Quah, Euton. 2007. Cost-Benefit Analysis. 5th ed.New York: Routledge.
OECD. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. OECD, Paris.
Okun, Arthur. 1975. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Trade-Off. Brookings Institution Press (Re-print 2015).
OMB (US Office of Management and Budget). 1992. Circular A-94: Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs, Washington, DC.
Pigou, Arthur C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed.London: MacMilan, Vol. 1952
Pigou, Arthus C. 1928. A Study in Public Finance. 3rd ed.London: MacMilan, Vol. 1947.
Romijn, Gerbert, and Renes, Gusta. 2013. General Guidance for Cost-Benefit Analysis. The Hague: CPB/PBL.
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 387389.
Sandmo, Agnar. 1998. “Redistribution and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Journal of Public Economics, 70: 365382.
Sandmo, Agnar. 2011. Economics Evolving; A History of Economic Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Slemrod, Joel and Yitzhaki, Shlomo. 2001. “Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: the Marginal Cost of Funds and the Marginal Benefit of Projects.” National Tax Journal, 54(2): 189202.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Partha S., Dasgupta 1971. “Differential Taxation, Public Goods, and Economic Efficiency,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 38 pp. 151174.
Treasury, H.M. 2011. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government Treasury Guidance. London: TSO.
Van der Pol, Thomas, Bos, Frits, and Romijn, Gerbert. 2017. Distributionally Weighted Cost-Benefit Analysis: From Theory to Practice. CPB Discussion Paper. An earlier draft was presented at the 9th Conference of the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis, March 15–17, 2017, Washington, DC.
Van ’t Riet, Maarten. 2016. Een kleine geschiedenis van de theorie van kosten-batenanalyse. CPB-memo.
Water Resources Council. 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Werkgroep Kosten van belastingheffing en MKBA’s. 2017. Kosten van Belastingheffing. Baten van Inkomensherverdeling en MKBA’s, Report to the Dutch Government.
World Bank. 1994. Operational Manual OP 10.04 Economic Evaluation of Investment Operations. World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2010. Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects. World Bank, Washington D.C.
Zerbe, Richard, Davis, Tyler B., Garland, Nancy, and Scott, Tyler. 2010. Towards Principles and Standards in the Use of Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Summary of Work. Report by the Benefit-Cost Analysis Center.
Zoutman, Floris T., Jacobs, Bas and Jongen, Egbert L.W.. 2016. Redistributive Politics and the Tyranny of the Middle Class. Tinbergen Institute, TI 2016-032/VI.


Should Benefit-Cost Analysis Include a Correction for the Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation?

  • Frits Bos (a1), Thomas van der Pol (a2) and Gerbert Romijn (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed