Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Benefits and Costs of Regulating and Restricting Chemicals: The European Union’s REACH System and Its Effects on the Austrian Economy

  • Michael Getzner (a1) and Denise Schulz-Zak (a2)

Abstract

The European Union’s regulation for chemical safety (REACH) addresses the registration, evaluation, assessment, and consequent authorization (or restriction) of chemicals which are potentially harmful for both public health and the environment. The current study aims at ascertaining the costs and benefits of the REACH framework for the Austrian economy under major uncertainties, and draws on a wide range of databases on public and workplace health, chemical accidents in households, and the potential environmental impacts of harmful chemicals.

The uncertainties in the REACH system assessments of the effects of chemicals on health lie not only in the insufficiency of scientific evidence but also in the economic evaluation of effects on health, especially in regard to the value of statistical life (VSL), and the economic value of diseases attributed to chemicals.

This benefit-cost analysis (BCA) of the REACH system in Austria therefore takes into account these manifold uncertainties by designing a conservative baseline scenario and by varying all determinants in comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Projected over a period of about 30 years, this paper provides evidence that the REACH system most probably leads to net benefits for the Austrian economy (benefit-cost ratio of about 10.6) even though many benefits are still highly uncertain or unknown.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Alberini, Anna(2017) Measuring the economic value of the effects of chemicals on ecological systems and human health. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 116, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Andersson, Linus, Johansson, Åke, Millqvist, Eva, Nordin, Steven & Bende, Mats (2008). Prevalence and Risk Factors for Chemical Sensitivity and Sensory Hyperreactivity in Teenagers. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 211(5), 690697.
Angerer, Gerhard, Nordbeck, Ralf & Sartorius, Christian (2008). Impacts on Industry of Europe’s Emerging Chemicals Policy REACH. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(4), 636647.
AUVA (2014). Data on Accidents in Households and at the Workplace, Special Analysis of Work-place Health Risks. www.auva.at [accessed May 2014].
Bardana, Emil J. Jr. (2003). Occupational Asthma and Allergies. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 111(2), 530539.
Bateman, Ian J., Mace, Georgina M., Fezzi, Carlo, Atkinson, Giles & Turner, R. Kerry (2014). Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessment. In Ninan, Karachepone N. (Ed.), Valuing Ecosystem Services (pp. 2377). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Batzdorfer, Ludger & Schwanitz, Hans Joachim (2004). Ökonomische Folgen berufsbedingter Hauterkrankungen. Betriebliche Prävention, 2004(6), 278280.
Bauer, Anke, Schwarz, Eberhard & Mai, Christoph (2008). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): Ein Update. Umwelt Medizin Gesellschaft, 21(4), 915.
Bellavance, Francois, Dionne, Georges & Lebeau, Martin (2009). The Value of a Statistical Life: A Meta-Analysis with a Mixed Effects Regression Model. Journal of Health Economics, 28(2), 444464.
Bergkamp, Lucas (2013). Does REACH Present a Business Opportunity? In Bergkamp, Lucas (Ed.), The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals – Law and Practice (pp. 396409). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergkamp, Lucas & Herbatschek, Nicolas (2013). Key Concepts and Scope. In Bergkamp, Lucas (Ed.), The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals – Law and Practice (pp. 4081). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bock, Karl Walter & Birbaumer, Niels (1998). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Schädigung durch Chemikalien oder Nozobo-Effekt. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 95(3), 9194.
Bolt, Hermann & Kiesswetter, Ernst (2002). Is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity a Clinically Defined Entity? Toxicology Letters, 128(1), 99106.
Boschetto, Piera, Quintavalle, Sonja, Miotto, Deborah, Lo Cascio, Natalina, Zeni, Elena & Mapp, Cristina (2006). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Occupational Exposures. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 1(11), 16.
Cesnaitis, Romanas, Sobanska, Marta A., Versonnen, Bram, Sobanski, Tomasz, Bonnomet, Vincent, Tarazona, Jose V. & De Coen, Wim (2013). Analysis of the Ecotoxicity Data Submitted within the Framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 3. Experimental Sediment Toxicity Assays. Science of the Total Environment, 475(15 March 2014), 116122.
Chiu, Weihsueh A.(2017). Chemical risk assessment and translation to socio-economic assessments. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 117, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Corsini, Emanuela, Galbiati, Valentina, Nikitovic, Dragana & Tsatsakis, Aristidis M. (2013). Role of Oxidative Stress in Chemical Allergens Induced Skin Cells Activation. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 61(November 2013), 7481.
CSES, Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services (2012a). Study on the impact of REACH regulation on the innovativeness of the EU chemical industry. Report prepared for the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, European Commission.
CSES, Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services (2012b). Interim evaluation: Functioning of the European chemical market after the introduction of REACH. Report prepared for the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, European Commission.
Das-Munshi, Jayati, Rubin, James G. & Wessely, Simon (2007). Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Review. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 15(4), 274280.
De Luca, Chiara, Raskovic, Desanka, Pacifico, Valeria, Thai, Jeffrey Chung Sheun & Korkina, Liudmila (2011). The Search for Reliable Biomarkers of Disease in Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and other Environmental Intolerances. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(7), 27702797.
Domazlicky, Bruce R. & Weber, William L. (2004). Does Environmental Protection lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry? Environmental and Resource Economics, 28(3), 301324.
Dudley, Susan E.(2017). Retrospective evaluation of chemical regulations. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 118, OECD Publishing, Paris.
ECHA (2014). Understanding REACH. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Helsinki (http://echa.europa.eu, September 2014).
ECOTEC (2003). Derivation of assessment factors for human health risk assessment. Technical Report No. 86, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECOTEC), Brussels.
European Commission (2003). Regulation of the European parliament and of the council concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH), establishing a European chemicals agency and amending directive 1999/45/EC and regulation (EC) Extended Impact Assessment. SEC (2003) 1171/3.
European Commission (2008). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects – structural funds, cohesion fund and instrument for pre-accession. European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy, Brussels.
European Commission (2013). Final report for REACH. COM(2013) 49 final, Brussels.
European Commission (2018). Commission general report on the operation of REACH and review of certain elements. COM(2018) 116 final, Brussels.
European Investment Bank (2013). The economic appraisal of investment projects at the EIB. European Investment Bank, Luxemburg.
Eurostat (2012). The REACH baseline study 5 years update. Comprehensive study report, Eurostat, Luxemburg.
ExternE (1999). Externalities of energy. Volume 7: Methodology update 1998. European Commission, Brussels.
Georgiou, Stavros, Rheinberger, Christoph M. & Vainio, Matti (2018). Benefit-Cost Analysis in EU Chemicals Legislation: Experience from over 100 REACH Applications for Authorisation. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 9(1), 181204.
Getzner, Michael(2000). Risk, uncertainty, and discounting in practical environmental decision making. Paper presented at the 49th International Atlantic Economic Conference, University of Munich.
Getzner, Michael (2006). Kosten und Nutzeffekte der Chemikalienpolitik. Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten–Nutzen–Analyse der neuen EU-Chemiepolitik (REACH) für Österreich. Vienna: LIT Verlag.
Getzner, Michael (2008). Uncertainties and the Precautionary Principle in Cost-Benefit Environmental Policies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(1), 117.
Getzner, Michael, Mahlberg, Bernhard, Plas, Christian, Schweighofer, Johann, Schwärz, Magdalena & Zak, Denise(2015). REACH – evaluation of the impacts on the affected industries and the whole economy in Austria. Research report to the Austrian Ministry of the Environment; Vienna University of Technology/denkstatt/IWI, Vienna.
Gowdy, John, Howarth, Richard B. & Tisdell, Clem (2011). Discounting, Ethics and Options for Maintaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Integrity. In Kumar, Pushpam (Ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – Ecological and Economic Foundations (pp. 257283). London: Routledge.
Gubbels-van Hal, Ineke, Pelkmans, Jacques & Schrefler, Lorna(2013). REACH: A killer Whale for SMEs? CEPS Policy Brief 307, Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels.
Hammerschmidt, Thea & Marx, Romy (2014). REACH and Occupational Health and Safety. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(6), 112.
Hanschmidt, Angelika, Lulei, Michael & Paetz, Andrea (2013). Five Years REACH: Lessons Learned and first Experiences – an Industry’s View. Environmental Sciences Europe, 25(19), 18.
Hansen, Bjorn (2013). Background and Structure of REACH. In Bergkamp, Lucas (Ed.), The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals – Law and Practice (pp. 1722). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansjürgens, Bernd & Nordbeck, Ralf (2007). REACH und Innovationen. uwf – UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 15(4), 205208.
Hansjürgens, Bernd & Nordbeck, Ralf(Eds.) (2005). Chemikalienregulierung und Innovationen zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
Hausteiner, Constanze, Bornschein, Susanne, Hansen, Jochen, Zilker, Thomas & Förstl, Hans (2005). Self-Reported Chemical Sensitivity in Germany: A Population-Based Survey. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208(4), 271278.
Heitmann, Kerstin & Reihlen, Antonia(2007). Case study on ’announcement effect’ in the market related to the candidate list of substances subject to authorization. Report by Ökopol, Hamburg.
Herry Consult (2013). UKR Heim, Freizeit und Sport. Ermittlung der Unfallkosten für die Bereiche Heim, Freizeit und Sport 2011. Report commissioned by Kuratorium für Verkehrssicherheit (KfV), Vienna.
Jeebhay, Mohamed F. & Quirce, Santiago (2007). Occupational Asthma in the Developing and Industrialised World: A Review. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 11(2), 122133.
Kaberlah, Fritz, Augustin, Roland, Bunke, Dirk, Schwarz, Markus & Oppl, Reinhard(2011). Karzinogene, mutagene, reproduktionstoxische (CMR) und andere problematische Stoffe in Produkten – Identifikation relevanter Stoffe und Erzeugnisse, Überprüfung durch Messungen, Regelungsbedarf im Chemikalienrecht. UBA Texte 18/2011, Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Berlin.
Kimber, Ian, Basketter, David A. & Dearman, Rebecca J. (2010). Chemical Allergens – What are the Issues? Toxicology, 268(3), 139142.
Kimber, Ian & Dearman, Rebecca J. (2002). Chemical Respiratory Allergy: Role of IgE Antibody and Relevance of Route of Exposure. Toxicology, 181–182(27 December 2002), 311315.
Kimber, Ian, Dearman, Rebecca. J., Basketter, David. A. & Boverhof, Darrell. R. (2014). Chemical Respiratory Allergy: Reverse Engineering an Adverse Outcome Pathway. Toxicology, 318(6 April 2014), 3239.
Lacour, Michael, Zunder, Thomas, Schmidtke, Klaus, Vaith, Peter & Scheidt, Carl (2005). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome (MCS) – Suggestions for an Extension of the US MCS-Case Definition. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208(3), 141151.
Leiter, Andrea M. (2011). Age Effects in Monetary Valuation of Reduced Mortality Risks: The Relevance of Age-Specific Hazard Rates. European Journal of Health Economics, 12(4), 331344.
Lindhjem, Henrik, Navrud, Stale, Braathen, Nils Axel & Biausque, Vincent (2011). Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions from Environmental, Transport, and Health Policies: A Global Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. Risk Analysis, 31(9), 13811407.
Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon, Leal, Jose, Gray, Alastair & Sullivan, Richard (2013). Economic Burden of Cancer across the European Union: A Population-based Cost Analysis. The Lancet Oncology, 14(12), 11651174.
McKee, Richard H., Tibaldi, Rosalie, Adenuga, Moyinoluwa D., Carrillo, Juan-Carlos & Margary, Alison (2018). Assessment of the Potential Human Health Risks from Exposure to Complex Substances in Accordance with REACH Requirements. ‘White Spirit’ as a Case Study. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 92(February), 439457.
Miller, Claudia S. (1996). Chemical Sensitivity: Symptom, Syndrome or Mechanism for Disease? Toxicology, 111(1), 6986.
Musu, Tony(2004). REACHing the workplace: How workers stand to benefit from the new European policy on chemical agents. European Trade Union, Technical Bureau for Health and Safety (TUTB), Brussels.
Musu, Tony(2006). REACH am Arbeitsplatz: die potenziellen Vorteile der neuen europäischen Chemikalienpolitik für die ArbeitnehmerInnen. Informationen zur Umweltpolitik 169, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte, Vienna.
Navrud, Stale(2017). Possibilities and challenges in transfer and generalisation of monetary estimates for environmental and health benefits of regulating chemicals. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 119, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Nies, Eberhard, Musanke, Uwe, Püringer, Joe, Rühl, Reinhold & Arnone, Mario (2013). DNELs for Workplaces – Observations from an Inspection of the DGUV DNEL list. Gefahrstoffe – Reinhaltung der Luft, 73(11/12), 455462.
Nordbeck, Ralf (2005). Europäische Chemikalienregulierung – Hemmnis oder Anreiz für Innovationen zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften? In Hansjürgens, Bernd &  Nordbeck, Ralf (Eds.), Chemikalienregulierung und Innovationen zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften (pp. 123169). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
Öko-Institut (2016). REACH baseline study – 10 years Update: Monitoring REACH with the Risk & Quality Indicator System. Report to the European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels.
Pickvance, Simon, Karnon, Jon, Peters, Jean & El-Arifi, Karen(2005). Further assessment of the impact of REACH on occupational health with a focus on skin and respiratory diseases. Final report, prepared for the European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health & Safety, Brusssels.
Püringer, Joe (2011). Derived Minimal Effect Levels (DMEL): Defizite ein Jahr nach der REACH-Registrierungspflicht. Gefahrstoffe – Reinhaltung der Luft, 71(11), 471.
Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan, He, Qile, Black, Andrew, Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David (2017). Environmental Regulations, Innovation and Firm Performance: A Revisit of the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(Part II), 7992.
Reihlen, Antonia & Lüskow, Heike(2007). Analysis of Studies Discussing the Benefits of REACH. Ökopol, Institut für Ökologie und Politik, Hamburg.
Rogers, Ken (2014). Idiopathic Environmental Intolerances. In Wexler, Philip (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Toxicology. (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
RPA (2003). Assessment of the impact of the new chemical policy on occupational health. Final report prepared for the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
RPA (2015). Technical assistance related to the review of REACH with regard to the extension of the registration requirements for substances manufactured or imported between 1 and 10 tonnes per year. Report for the European Commission, DG Environment (ENV.A.3/SER/2013/0057r).
RPA (2016). Study on the calculation of the benefits of chemicals legislation on human health and the environment – development of a system of indicators. Report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
Rühl, Reinhold (2007). Mit REACH zu einem sicheren Umgang. , 48(9), 2934.
Scialli, Anthony R. (2008). The Challenge of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology under REACH. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 51(2), 244250.
Skovbjerg, Sine, Brorson, Stig, Rasmussen, Alice, Johansen, Jeanne Duus & Elberling, Jesper (2009). Impact of Self-Reported Multiple Chemical Sensitivity on Everyday Life: a Qualitative Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(6), 621626.
Sobanska, Marta A., Cesnaitis, Romanas, Sobanski, Tomasz, Versonnen, Bram, Bonnomet, Vincent, Tarazona, Jose V. & De Coen, Wim (2013). Analysis of the Ecotoxicity Data Submitted within the Framework of the REACH Regulation: Part 1. General Overview and Data Availability for the first Registration Deadline. The Science of the Total Environment, 470–471, 12251232.
Sommer, Heini, Brügger, Othmar, Lieb, Christoph & Niemann, Steffen(2007).Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten der Nichtberufsunfälle in der Schweiz. Strassenverkehr, Sport, Haus und Freizeit. bfu–Swiss Council for Accident Prevention: Berne.
Statistics Austria (2014a). Demographic prognosis. www.statistik.at (accessed September 2014).
Statistics Austria (2014b). NAMEA data for Austria. www.statistik.at (accessed September 2014).
Stern, Nicholas (2006). The Economic of Climate Change – The Stern Review. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Tarazona, Jose V., Sobanska, Marta A., Cesnaitis, Romanas, Sobanski, Tomasz, Bonnomet, Vincent, Versonnen, Bram & De Coen, Wim (2014). Analysis of the Ecotoxicity Data Submitted within the Framework of the REACH Regulation: Part 2. Experimental Aquatic Toxicity Assays. Science of the Total Environment, 472, 137145.
Van Wassenhove, Luk N., Lebreton, Baptiste & Lorenz, Tobias(2008). The REACH directive and its impact on the european chemical industry: A critical review. INSEAD Working Paper No. 53.
Versonnen, Bram, Tarazona, Jose V., Cesnaitis, Romanas, Sobanska, Marta A., Sobanski, Tomasz, Bonnomet, Vincent & De Coen, Wim (2013). Analysis of the Ecotoxicity Data Submitted within the Framework of the REACH Regulation: Part 4. Experimental Terrestrial Toxicity Assays. Science of the Total Environment, 475, 123131.
Viscusi, W. Kip & Masterman, Clayton J. (2017). Income Elasticities and Global Values of a Statistical Life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 8(2), 226250.
Winder, Chris (2002). Mechanisms of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Toxicology Letters, 128(1), 8597.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Getzner and Schulz-Zak supplementary material
Getzner and Schulz-Zak supplementary material 1

 Unknown (92 KB)
92 KB

Benefits and Costs of Regulating and Restricting Chemicals: The European Union’s REACH System and Its Effects on the Austrian Economy

  • Michael Getzner (a1) and Denise Schulz-Zak (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed