Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:00:34.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Growth and Municipal Development in the Colonial City of Madras, 1860–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Susan J. Lewandowski
Get access

Extract

Madras City, founded in the mid-seventeenth century, was the earliest colonial port city established by the British in India. Like the other port cities of Asia which were the creation of European powers, Madras functioned primarily as a base for overseas trade. As it grew and developed, its morphological and spatial patterns were dictated by the presence of a western population which at first was exclusively trade-oriented, but over the centuries became involved in banking, business and administration. As the British shifted from their role as traders to rulers of the Indian Subcontinent, they added a new dimension to the cities they created—a municipal apparatus to monitor urban growth, to regulate the use of land, and to insure that certain areas, especially those where they resided, would receive adequate urban facilities. The cities they founded had certain characteristics: each contained a large indigenous populace, far outnumbering the colonial elite that was effectively in charge of urban development. The residential areas of these urban dwellers were spatially segregated from those of the Europeans, and more densely populated. Indigenous and colonial life-styles determined the nature of settlement patterns and, in turn, molded the form of the built environment.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , February 1975 , pp. 341 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Barlow, Glyn, The Story of Madras (London: Humphrey Milford, 1921), p. m .Google Scholar

2 For a more detailed discussion of colonial port cities in Asia see Rhoads Murphey, “Urbanization in Asia,” in Gerald Breese (ed.) The City in Newly Developing Countries (London: Prentice-Hall, 1972), pp. 58–75.Google Scholar

3 See R. J. Horvaih, “In search of a theory of urbanization: the colonial city,” in East Lakes Geographer, V (1969), pp. 60–82, and McGee, T. G., The Southeast Asian City (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1967), Chapters 3 and 4.Google Scholar

4 The administration and the professions supported 13.3% of the Madras population, and personal service 12.6%. In Calcutta, the former category supported 10.4% of the population, while the latter, 16.5%. Cental of India, 1901: Madras (Madras: Government Press, 1902), XV, Pt. I, 214;Google Scholarand Census of India, 1901: Calcutta (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press, 1902), VII, Pt. IV, 83.Google Scholar

5 In thousands, London 3254, Calcutta 795, Bombay 644, Liverpool 493, and Madras 398. Spate, O. H. K., India and Parisian (London: Methuen and Company, 1954), p. 700.Google Scholar

6 In 1881 Madras was five times the size of (he next largest town in South India which was Trichinopoly, population 84,449. Census of India, 1891: Madras (Madras: Government Press, 1893), XIII, p. 25.Google Scholar

7 During ihis twenty year period from 1890 to 1910, out of a total increase of 66,100; 46,200 was attributed to immigration. Madeley, J. W., “The Past and Future Growth of the Population of Madras City,” in Journal of the South Indian Association, III (October, 1912 and January, 1913), p. 158.Google Scholar

8 Census of India, 1891: Madras, XIII, p. 202.Google Scholar

9 Jacques Dupuis, Madras et le Nord du Coro-mandel (Paris: Libraric D'Ameriquc ct D'Orient Adrien Maisonncuvc, 1960), p. 38.Google Scholar

10 Molony, J. Chartrcs, A Book of South India (London: Methuen and Company, 1926), p. 141.Google Scholar

11 In 1900 there were 503 females per thousand males in Calcutta; 617 in Bombay and 984 in Madras. Census of India, 1901: Calcutta, VII, Pt. IV, 18;Google ScholarCensus of India, 1901: Bombay (Bombay: Times of India Press, 1901), XI, Pt. V, 25Google Scholarand Census of India, 1901: Madras, XV, Pt. I, 65.Google Scholar

12 In 1891, among Oriya speakers only 10% women. Report on the Census of Calcutta, (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press, 1891), 5–26.Google Scholar

13 Discussion with Barbara Saunders from the University of Leicester who is doing an economic history of Madras City.

14 Love, Henry Davison, Vestiges of Old Madras (London: Government of Indiji. 1913), Vol. I, P. 35.Google Scholar

15 For a more detailed discussion of early residential patterns see Pasupatham, C. C., “Madras City—A Study of Evolution,” unpublished Master's thesis, (School of planning and Architecture, Madras University, April 1967).Google Scholar

16 Srinivasachari, C. S., Histoty of the City of Madras (Madras: P. Varadachary and Company, 1939). P. 17.Google Scholar

17 Census of the Town of Madras, 1871 (Madras; Fort St. George Gazette Press, 1873), P. 26.Google Scholar

18 Lewandowski, Susan J., “Kerala Migrants in Madras City,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, (University of Chicago, 1972), pp. 68–69.Google Scholar

19 Census of India, 1901: Calcutta, VII, Pi. IV, p. 66.Google Scholar

20 The largest number of multi-storied terraced houses were located in Black Town, reflecting the concentration of indigenous wealth in this sector of the city where the majority of native merchants and grain dealers resided. Census of the Town of Madras, 1871, p. 71.Google Scholar

21 Report of the Administration of the Municipality of Madras (hereafter M.M.R.), 1871–1872 (Madras: Government Gazette Press, 1873), p. 154.Google Scholar

22 In 1871 there were 51,741 houses in Madras City accommodating 87,075 separate families. Census of the Town of Madras, 1871, p. 72.Google Scholar

23 Census of India, 1901: Madras, XV, Pt. I, p. 17.Google Scholar

24 Between 1870 and 1900 mortality rates rose steadily in Madras from an average for the city as a whole of 30.7 per mille to 39.4 per mille. Figures for 1870, an average for the preceding twelve year period, were taken from Report of the Sanitary Commissioner for Madras, 1872: Appendix I, “Memorandum on the Death Rate in the Town of Madras,” p. ii, and for 1901, an average of the previous ten years, from J. W. Madeley, “The Past and Future Growth of Madras,” p. 161.

25 M.M.R., 1901–1902, p. 26.

26 Captain Hector Tulloch. Report on a Project for the Drainage of Madras (Madras: Cantz Brothers, 1865), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

27 For figures, refer to Annual Medical Report of the Madras Government Lying-in Hospital for the year 1876–77 (Madras: Keys, Government Press, 1877), p. 6.Google Scholar

28 Madras Mail. March 7, 1885,Google Scholar“Medical Aid for Caste and Gosha Women,” and Madras Native Newspaper Reports for 1890 (hereafter M.N.N.R.),Google ScholarVettikkodiyon, April 15, 1890, p. 77.Google Scholar

29 Madras Mail. July 13, 1886,Google Scholar“The Triplicane Burial Ground Question,” and M.N.N.R. for 1894,Google ScholarShams-ul-Akhar, 11 June 1894Google Scholar and Khasim-ul-Akbar, 18 June, 1894, pp. 188–189.Google Scholar

30 There were seventy-two separate burial grounds for Muslims registered in 1879 in Mylaporc Division. M.M.R. 1879, pp. 116–118.

31 See Sjoberg, Gideon, The Pretndustrial Cily (New York: Free Press, 1965), pp. 97–98.Google Scholar

32 For figures, see Table 5.

33 Green, L. B., The Milling of Rice in the Madras Presidency (Madras: Government Press, 1918), p. 2.Google Scholar

34 M.M.R., 1902–03, p. 23.Google Scholar

35 M.M.R., 1892–93, p. 76,Google Scholar and see the previous reference.

36 Administration Report of the Corporation of Madras: Health Department (Madras: Guardian Press, 1914), p. 9. These arc a continuation of the Madras Municipal Reports.Google Scholar

37 Breese, Gerald, Urbanization in Newly Developing Countries (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 1966). p. 65.Google Scholar

38 Richard Ellefsen, “The Evolution of Areal Patterns in Madras City,” unpublished mimcographed paper, p. 12.

39 Two favorite locations were Komalcswaranpct and Mylaporc villages which both contained ancient temples.

40 Ellefscn, p. 22, discusses the difficulty in subdividing some of the larger plots of land which were ultimately abandoned.

41 Some of the reports written at the time were: Papers Connected with the Improvement of Drain-age and Sewerage of Black Town as projected by O'Connell, Lt. P. P. (Madras: Fort St. Ccorge Gazette Press, 1855);Google ScholarTulloch, , Report on a Project for the Drainage of Madras, 1865;Google ScholarReport of the Sanitary Commissioner for Madras, 1872;Google ScholarCornish, W. R., Report on Water Supply Drainage of the Town of Madras, 1890.Google Scholar

42 Madras Mail, July 8, 1872,Google Scholar“Tramways for Madras,” and M.M.R., 1874–75, P. 4.Google Scholar

43 Shunmugam, Runganada, Ripon Buildings—A Study of Madras Municipal Corporation at Worlk (Madras: Gordon and Co., 1940), p. 10.Google Scholar

44 Sec The City of Madras Municipal Act of 1878 (No. IV of 1878) in Acts of the Council of the Governor of Fort Saint George for the Years 1876–1878 (Madras: Government Press, 1879), p. 65.Google Scholar

45 A Guide to the City of Madras and its Suburbs. 3rd ed. (Madras: Higginbotham and Co., 1881), p. 11.Google Scholar

46 Madras Mail, September 24, 1879, “The Madras Municipality.”Google Scholar

47 Ibid

48 There were reputedly thirty-five markets Madras in 1892. Arya Jana Priyan, October 1892 in M.N.N.R. for 1892, p. 243.Google Scholar

49 Madras Mail, October 30, 1880, “The Scandal of the Exodus to the Hills.”Google Scholar

50 Madras Mail, October 30, 1880, “Exodus K the Hills—A Memorial Thereon.”Google Scholar

51 Corporation of Madras: Know Thy City in 1950–51 (Madras: n.d., 1951), pages unnumbered.Google Scholar

52 Report of a Committee on a Plan for Cleansing the Drains of Blacky Town, (Madras: Asylum Press, 1856), p. 21.Google Scholar

53 Madras Mail, February 2, 1876, “The Municipal Bill.”

54 Ibid

55 Madras Mail, July 31, 1877, “A Protest Against the Increased House Tax.”Google Scholar

56 Madras Mail. July 1, 1876, “Our Municipal Situation.”Google Scholar

57 A Guide to the City of Madras and its Suburbs. 2nd ed., p. I.Google Scholar

58 Census of the Town of Madras, 1871, p. 58,Google Scholar

and Dupuis, Jacques, Madras et le Nord du Coromandel, pp. 461–62.Google Scholar