This research has been funded by a grant from the School of Social Sciences Research Committee at La Trobe University. I am grateful to Carmel M. Spottiswood for her editorial help.

¹ Scheiner, Irwin, “The Mindful Peasant: Sketches for a Study of Rebellion,” Journal of Asian Studies 32 (August, 1973), 581–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

² Borton, Hugh, “Peasant Uprisings in Japan of the Tokugawa Period,” Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, Second Series, 16 (May, 1938), 1–219Google Scholar.

³ Notable works in the field include: Kokushō Iwao, Hyafyuhō ikki no kenkyū (A study of peasant uprisings) (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1928); Horic Eiichi, Meiji ishin no shafai kōsei (Social configurations of the Meiji Restoration) (Tokyo: Yūhikaku, 1954); Hani Gorō, Meiji ishin kenkyü (A study of the Meiji Restoration) (Tokyo: Iwana-mi Shoten, 1956); Aoki Kōji, Meiji nōmin sōjō no nenji-teki kenkyū (A chronological study of peasant disturbances in the Meiji Period) (Tokyo: Shinsei-sha, 1967); Shōji Kichinosuke, Yonaoshi ikki no kenkyü (A study of yonaoshi uprisings) (Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1970). For a comprehensive bibliography, see the citations at the end of Scheiner's article.

⁴ Brinton, Crane, The Anatomy of Revolution (New York: Vintage Books, 1965), 60Google Scholar.

⁵ Gilbert Shapiro and Philip Dawson, “Social Mobility and Political Radicalism: The Case of the French Revolution,” in William O. Aydelotte, et al. (eds.), The Dimensions of Quantitative Research in History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972), 159–191.

⁶ Mitchell, Edward, “Inequality and Insurgency: A Statistical Study of South Vietnam,” World Politics 20 (April, 1968), 421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷ Malfakis, Edward E., Agrarian Reform and Peasant Revolution in Spain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

⁸ Russett, Bruce, “Inequality and Instability,” World Politics 16 (April, 1964), 442–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Snyder, David and Tilly, Charles, “Hardship and Collective Violence in France, 1830 to 1960,” American Sociological Review 37 (October, 1972), 520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁰ Davies, James C., “Toward a Theory of Revolution,” American Sociological Review 26 (February, 1962), 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Ivo K. and Feierabend, Rosalind L., “Aggressive Behaviors within Polities, 1948–1962: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 10 (September, 1966), 249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹² Ted Robert Gurr, “A Causal Model of Civil Strife: A Comparative Analysis Using New Indices,” American Political Science Review 62 (Dcember, 1968), 1104–1124.

¹³ Snyder and Tilly, op. cit., 520.

¹⁴ Hani, op. cit.

¹⁵ See articles written by Tanaka Akira, Shiba-hara Takuji, and Ikeda Takamasa in Iwanami Kōza Nihon rekjshi: Kindai I (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1962).

¹⁶ Kokushō, op. cit.

¹⁷ Mōri Toshihiko, Meiji ishin seiji-shi josetsu (An introduction to political history of the Meiji Restoration) (Tokyo: Mirai-sha, 1967).

¹⁸ Fujino Tamotsu, “Bakumatsu ishin-ki ni okeru shohan no kōzō to sono dōkō (Structure and trend of small domains at the end of the Tokugawa period and at the time of the Restoration),” Shirin 46 (1963).

¹⁹ Borton, op. cit.

²⁰ Citations are from the translation by Stuart Gilbert (Garden City: Doubleday, 1955).

²¹ 5 (January, 1882), 9–22; and 8 (April, 1882), 97–107, both reported by Kure Fumisato.

²² Ryūken, Ōhashi, Nippon no kaikyū kōsei (Japanese class composition) (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1971), 10Google Scholar.

²³ Scores reported in the data for this index are the mean average scores of 1864 through 1868.

²⁴ Beasley, W. G., “Feudal Revenue in Japan at the Time of the Meiji Restoration,” Journal of Asian Studies 19 (May, 1968), 259Google Scholar.

²⁵ Hall, John Whitney, Government and Local Power in Japan 500 to 1700 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), 371Google Scholar.

²⁶ Tokyo: Sanichi Shobō, 1971.

²⁷ More concrete categories of these revolts are discussed later in this paper.

²⁸ The figures also include those cases which erupted at the end of the Tokugawa period (bakti matsu) but whose exact years of eruption are unknown.

²⁹ A one-tailed test of significance assumes that we can hypothesize the direction of influence of an explanatory variable on a dependent variable in the population before we examine the relationship in the sample between the two variables. If the relationship in the sample is strong enough, we can infer that it is unlikely that the hypothesized directional relationship does not exist in the population, When we say that the relationship is significant at a critical level of p = 0.05, the degree of association between the two variables in the sample is so strong that the probability that we are in error in inferring the relationship in the population from the relationship in the sample is less than 5 percent.

³⁰ See Nihon rekishi daijiten, bekkan: Nihon rekishi chizu (Tokyo: Kawade Shobō, 1969), chart 42. Small domains whose hōdaka were below fifty thousand koku are not included.

³¹ Supporting the point, Figure I shows a drastic decline in the number of cases of revolt in 1867 (one year before the Restoration) when the anti Tokugawa movement organized by the samurai reached its peak.

³² Snyder and Tilly, op. cit., 528.

³³ Nagel, Ernest, Structure of Science (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961), 77–78Google Scholar.

³⁴ Yoshio Sugimoto, “Economic Fluctuations and Popular Disorders in Pre-War Japan (1773–1929),” Paper read at the 46th Congress of the Australian New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science, held at the Australian National University in January 1975.