Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:33:07.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Pageantry and Japan's “Symbolic Emperor”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Extract

Early on the morning of February 24, 1989, my companion and I set out from our lodgings in central Tokyo for the Imperial Plaza. Though we knew that Emperor Shōwa's funeral procession would not be leaving the Palace until 9:35, we planned our arrival for 6:30 because a policeman had told us the day before that a huge crowd was expected. He suggested we arrive at 4:30, but 6:30 seemed early enough since we surmised that the rain and the near-freezing temperatures would keep the crowds away. Later, we would discover that the crowds that day were indeed smaller than had been expected—570,000 people along the funeral motorcade's route rather than the 870,000 spectators that the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department had originally projected (Asahi jaanaru, March 10, 1989; Asahi shinbun, February 25, 1989)—but by around 7:30 people filled the area fronting the Palace's main gate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Norio, Akasaka, Tokiwa, Inomata, et. al. 1989. Tennōsei—nyūmon [The emperor system—an introduction]. Tokyo: JICC Shuppankyoku.Google Scholar
Aronowitz, Stanley. 1979. “History as Disruption: On Benjamin and Foucault.” Humanities in Society 2 (Spring): 125–47.Google Scholar
Asahi Journal. 1989. “Tennō zenesuto ga rettō o ootta hi: 2/2 4 taisō dokyumento” [The day the emperor's general strike blanketed the archipelago: 2/24 imperial funeral document]. Asahi jaanaru, March 10, 17–21.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1980. “The Implosion of Meaning in the Media and the Implosion of the Social in the Masses.” In Woodward, Kathleen, ed., The Myths of Information: Technology and Post-industrial Culture. Madison, Wisconsin: Coda Press.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman, trans. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Arendt, Hannah, ed., Harry Zohn, trans. , Illuminations. Reprint. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Swain, J. W., trans. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Dyan, Daniel, and Katz, Elihu. 1985. “Electronic Ceremonies: Television Performs a Royal Wedding.” In Marshall Blonsky, ed., On Signs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, John. 1987. “British Cultural Studies and Television.” In Allen, Robert C., ed., Channels of Discourse. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi. 1986. “Japan's Modern National Ceremonies: A Historical Ethnography, 1868–1912.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi. 1989. “Tsukurareta nihon no kokkateki ibento” [Inventing national ceremonies: from Meiji to Heisei]. Shunju seikatsugaku 4 (Spring):2836.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi. 1990. “Kindai nihon ni okeru gunshū to tenno no pējento: shikakuteki shihai ni kansuru jakkan no kōsatsu” [Crowds and imperial pageantry in modern Japan: some thoughts on visual domination], Yoshimi Shunya, trans. Shisō 797 (November): 148–64.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi. Forthcomin g a. “Crowds and Imperial Pageantry in Modern Japan: Some Thoughts on Visual Domination.” In Fujitani, Takashi and Sakai, Naoki, eds., Problems in Modernity and Japan's Emperor System. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Fujitani, Takashi. Forthcoming b. “Inventing, Forgetting, Remembering: Toward a Historical Ethnography of the Nation-State. In Befu, Harumi, ed., Cultural Nationalism in East Asia. Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1979. “Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment.” In Newcomb, Horace, ed., Television: The Critical View, third edition. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1980. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Hall, Stuart et al., eds., Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Harootunian, H. D., and Miyoshi, Masao, ed., 1989. Postmodernism and Japan. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Naoki, Inose. 1986. Mikado no shōzō [Portrait of the Mikado]. Tokyo: Shōgakkan.Google Scholar
Naoki, Inose and Tetsuo, Yamaori. 1990. “Nihonjin to daijōsai: mienai gishiki” [The Japanese and the daijōsai: the invisible rite]. Shūkan posuto, November 16, 238–41.Google Scholar
Hisashi, Inoue. 1989. “‘Kū naru gyōretsu’ to hitobito no manazashi” [The empty procession’ and the gaze of the people]. Asahi jaanaru, March 10, 21–22.Google Scholar
Ryōsuke, Ishii. 1982. Tennō: tennō no seisei oyobi fushinsei no dentō [The Emperor The Emperor's origins and the tradition of no direct imperial rule]. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha.Google Scholar
Ivy, Marilyn. Forthcoming. “Formations of Mass Culture.” In Gordon, Andrew, ed., Postwar Japan as History. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ivy, Marilyn. “Media, Knowledge, and Consumption in Contemporary Japan: Reflections on the ‘Post-Mass’ Society.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1984. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review 146 (July-August): 53–92.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Alice Yaegar. 1986. Reproductions of Banality: Fascism, Literature, and French Intellectual Life. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kitabatake, Kiyoyasu. 1990. “Kunaichō ga misenai mama ni higi de wa nai to iu higi” [With the imperial household agency not showing, the secret rite which is not a secret rite]. Aera, December 4, 66–67.Google Scholar
Marin, Louis. 1988. Portrait of the King. Martha Houle, M., trans., foreword by Conley, Tom. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiichi, Matsushita. 1959. “Taishū tennōseiron” [On the mass emperor system]. In Osamu, Kuno, and Jirō, Kamishima, eds., Tennōsei ronshū [Essays on the emperor system], vol. 1. Tokyo: San’ichi Shobō, 1974.Google Scholar
Yukio, Mishima. 1968. “Bunka bōeiron” [In defense of culture]. In Mishima Yukio zenshū [The complete works of Mishima Yukio], vol. 33. Tokyo: Shinchōsha, 1976.Google Scholar
Seishi, Okada. 1989. “Daiō shūnin girei no genkei to sono tenkai” [The original forms and development of the great monarch's accession rites]. In Tadakuma, Iwai and Seishi, Okada, eds., Tennō daigawari gishiki no rekishiteki tenkai. Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobō.Google Scholar
Shinobu, Origuchi. 1928. “Daijōsai no hongi.” In Origuchi Shinobu zenshū [Complete works of Origuchi Shinobu], vol. 3. Tokyo: Chū¯o Kōronsha, 1954-57.Google Scholar
Eiji, Otsuka. 1988. “Shōjotachi no ’kawaii’ tennō.” Chūd kōron (December): 243–49.Google Scholar
Stronach, Bruce. 1989. “Japanese Television.” In Gid Powers, Richard and Kato, Hidetoshi, eds., Stronach, Bruce, assoc. ed., Handbook of Japanese Popular Culture. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kōji, Taki. 1988. Tennō no shōzō [Portrait of the emperor]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Tōyama Shigeki. 1989. “Meiji ishinki no tennō to tennōsei: tennō fushinseiron no hihan” [The emperor and the emperor system during the Meiji Restoration Period: a critique of the No Direct Imperial Rule thesis]. Rekishigaku zasshi 591 (March):2–8.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Watanabe. 1990. Sengo seijishi no naka no tennōsei [The emperor system in postwar political history]. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten.Google Scholar
Masao, Yamaguchi. 1977. “Kingship, Theatricality, and Marginal Reality in Japan.” In Jain, Ravindra K., ed., Text and Context: The Social Anthropology of Tradition. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Masao, Yamaguchi. 1978. “Tennōsei no shinsō kōzō” [The emperor system's deep structure] and “Tennōsei no shochō kūkan” [The emperor system's symbolic space]. In Chi no enkinhō [Perspectives on knowledge]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Yoneyama, Lisa. “Hiroshima Narratives and the Politics of Memory: A Study of Power, Knowledge and Identities.” Ph.D. diss., n.d., Department of Anthropology, Stanford University.Google Scholar