Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:15:00.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decolonization of the Philippines: A Russian and a French View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Theodore Friend
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , November 1962 , pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I am very grateful to Mrs. Elisabeth G. Ponafidine, Executive Director, International Institute, Buffalo, New York, for the translations, synopses, and discussion of both Levinson books which make this review possible.

2 Rabochcye dvizheniye na Filippinakh. [The Workers Movement in the Philippines], Moscow, 1957. 86Google Scholar. Translation by United States Joint Publications Research Service.

3 In citations, “I” refers to Filippiny Mezhdu Pervoy i Vtoroy Miravymi Voynami, and “II” refers to Filippiny Vchera i Segodnia.

4 Presumably he is the same G. Levinson who contributed “Two Trends of the National Bourgeoisie” to World Marxist Review, II (09 1959), 76–77Google Scholar. The writer there describes “reactionary” and “progressive” trends among bourgeoisie of all underdeveloped countries, but says the contest of trends “does not erase from the agenda the slogan for a united anti-imperialist front of the working class, peasantry, and national bourgeoisie.”