Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:12:25.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contested Past: The Boxers as History and Myth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Paul A. Cohen
Get access

Extract

The mythologized past is the past that predominates in the minds of most people. Therefore, even as historians strive to counter it, it behooves us to study it with care. Although any aspect of the past has the potential to live on as myth in the present, certain events and persons, because they resonate with themes of broader historical scope and importance, have this potential to an especially high degree. Thus, in American history, where racism has been such a pervasive historical pattern, figures like Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King who helped to ameliorate the condition of blacks are often treated in larger-than-life terms. To take a more complex case, in China in the twentieth century, where the West has been by turns hated as an imperialist aggressor and admired for its mastery of the secrets of wealth and power, the Boxers, because they attacked both the West and its modern secrets, have been alternately praised and reviled.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 82 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List Of References

Sheng, Ai. 1951. Quanfei jilüe [A brief account of the Boxer bandits]. In Bozan, Jian et al., eds., Yihetuan [The Boxers], 4 vols. Shanghai: Shenzhou Guoguang She. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Aron, Stephen. 1990. “How the West was Lost: The Transformation of Kentucky from Daniel Boone to Henry Clay.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cun, Bao. 1956. Yihetuan [The Boxers]. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Beijing fengbo jishi [The truth about the Beijing turmoil]. 1989. Beijing: Beijing Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Beijing Shifan Daxue Jinggangshan Gongshe Zhongwenxi lianhe dadui Tingjin bao bianjibu. 1967. “Wuchanjieji wenyi de yizhan hongdeng—Zan geming xiandai jingju yangbanxi Hongdeng ji” [A red lantern of proletarian literature and art—In praise of The Red Lantern, a model revolutionary Beijing opera on a contemporary theme]. Renmin ribao [People's daily], May 29, p. 8.Google Scholar
[Cai] Hesen, . 1924. “Yihetuan yu guomin geming” [The Boxers and the national revolution]. Xiangdao zhoubao [The guide weekly] No. 81:652–54.Google Scholar
Yuanpei, Cai. 1925. “Cai Yuanpei xiang geguo xuanyan” [Cai Yuanpei–s manifesto to all countries]. News clipping of July 30, 1925, in Jialun, Luo, ed. 1957. Geming wenxian [Revolutionary documents], Series 18. Taibei: Zhengzhong Shuju.Google Scholar
Carrére D'encausse, Hélène and Schram, Stuart R.. 1969. Marxism and Asia: An Introduction with Readings. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Duxiu, Chen. 1918. “Kelinde bei” [The von Ketteler Monument]. Xin qingnian [New youth] 5.5:449–58.Google Scholar
Duxiu, Chen 1924a. “Women duiyu Yihetuan liangge cuowu de guannian” [Our two mistaken conceptions concerning the Boxers]. Xiangdao zhoubao [The guide weekly] No. 81:645–46.Google Scholar
Duxiu, Chen. 1924b. “Ershiqi nian yilai guomin yundongzhong suo de jiaoxun” [Lessons to be derived from the national movements of the past twenty-seven years]. Xin qingnian [New youth] No. 4:15–22.Google Scholar
Duxiu, Chen. 1965. Duxiu wencun [Collected writings of Chen Duxiu]. Hong Kong: Yuandong Tushu Gongsi.Google Scholar
Tiesheng, Chen. 1919. “Quanshu yu quanfei” [The art of boxing and the Boxer bandits]. Xin qingnian [New youth] 6.2:218–19.Google Scholar
Zhenjiang, Chen and Xiao, Cheng. 1985. Yihetuan wenxian jizhu yu yanjiu [Explications and studies of Boxer writings]. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xiao, Cheng. 1983. “Minjian zongjiao yu Yihetuan jietie” [Popular religion and Boxer posters]. Lishi yanjiu [Historical studies] No. 2:147–63.Google Scholar
Monlin, Chiang [Jiang Menglin]. 1947. Tides from the West: A Chinese Autobiography. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
China in Chaos. 1927. Shanghai: North-China Daily News and North-China Herald.Google Scholar
Choubi oucun [Retained working notes]. 1983. Ed. by Yanjiusuo, Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Jindaishi and Zhongguo Dang'anguan, Diyi Lishi. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1991. “Being Chinese: The Peripheralization of Traditional Identity,” Daedalus 120.2:113–34.Google Scholar
Wanlun, Dong. 1976. “‘Jiangdong Liushisitun’ he lao shahuang de qin Hua baoxing—;Bo Suxiu wei lao shahuang qin Hua zuixing de wuchi bianhu” [“The Sixty-four Villages of Jiangdong” and the atrocities committed by the old czars in their aggression against China—A refutation of the Soviet revisionists' shameless defense of the crimes committed by the old czars in their aggression against China]. Wenshizhe [Literature, History, and Philosophy] No. 1:85–92.Google Scholar
“Down with Ch'i Pen-yü.” 1968. American Consulate General, Survey of China Mainland Press (Hong Kong) No. 4158 (April 16): 14–15 (trans, from Wenge fengyun, No. 3, March 1968).Google Scholar
Esherick, Joseph. 1987. The Origins of the Boxer Uprising. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fudan Daxue Lishixi er hongweibing. 1967. “Jicheng he fayang ‘Hongdengzhao’ de geming zaofan jingshen” [Carry on and develop the revolutionary rebel spirit of the “Red Lanterns”]. Wenhuibao, April 14, p. 4.Google Scholar
Geming lishi yanjiusuo et al. 1967. “‘Hongdengzhao’ de geming zaofan jingshen wansui” [Long live the revolutionary rebel spirit of the “Red Lanterns”]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], April 27, p. 4.Google Scholar
Goldman, Merle. 1981. China's Intellectuals: Advise and Dissent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. “Inventing Traditions.” In Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds., The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
“Hong xiao jiang zan” [In praise of the young red generals]. 1967. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], April 27, p. 3.Google Scholar
“‘Hongdengzhao’ de geming zaofan jingshen hao de hen” [The revolutionary rebel spirit of the “Red Lanterns” is very fine]. 1967. Beijing ribao [Beijing daily], April 27, p. 4.Google Scholar
“‘Hongdengzhao’ de geming zaofan jingshen wansui” [Long live the revolutionary rebel spirit of the “Red Lanterns”]. 1967. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], April 27, p. 4.Google Scholar
“‘Hongdengzhao’ zan” [In praise of the “Red Lanterns”]. 1967. Jiefang ribao [Liberation daily], April 23.Google Scholar
Hu, I. 1926. “Did the Boxer Uprising Recur in 1925?” The Chinese Students' Monthly 21.3:33–38.Google Scholar
Shi, Hu. 1925. “Jinri jiaohui jiaoyu de nanguan” [The present crisis in Christian education]. In Hu Shi, Hu Shi wencun [Collected writings of Hu Shi]. Taibei: Yuandong Tushu Gongsi, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Shi, Hu. 1953. Hu Shi wencun [Collected writings of Hu Shi], 4 vols. Taibei: Yuandong Tushu Gongsi.Google Scholar
Shih, Hu [Shi]. 1925. “The Present Crisis in Christian Education.” Religious Education 20.6:434–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, Huang. 1950. Yihetuan [The Boxers]. Beijing: Kaiming Shudian.Google Scholar
Hunan sheng Dongli Jichang gongren lilun xiaozu. 1974. “Yihetuan fandi fanfeng pi Kong-Meng” [The Boxers opposed imperialism and feudalism and criticized Confucius and Mencius]. Changsha ribao [Changsha daily], December 28, p. 3.Google Scholar
Hung, Chang-Tai. 1989. “Female Symbols of Resistance in Chinese Wartime Spoken Drama.” Modern China 15.2:149–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Information about Ch'i Pen-yü.” 1968. American Consulate General, Survey of China Mainland Press (Hong Kong) No. 4159 (April 17):4–5 (trans, from Hong dianxun, March 27, 1968).Google Scholar
Weifan, Jiang and Xibai, Han. 1986. “Ye tan gengzi shibianzhong de aiguo yu maiguo wenti” [A further discussion of the question of patriotism and betrayal during the 1900 incident]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], March 5, p. 3.Google Scholar
Fu, Ke. 1967. “Cong ‘Qieyang jie’ dao ‘Fandi lu’ ” [From “Cut off the foreigners' street” to “Anti-imperialism road“]. Renmin ribao [People's daily], April 24, p. 4.Google Scholar
Lensen, Alexander. 1967. The Russo-Cbinese War. Tallahassee: The Diplomatic Press.Google Scholar
Dazhao, Li. 1926. “Sun Zhongshan Xiansheng zai Zhongguo minzu gemingshishang zhi weizhi [The place of Mr. Sun Yat-sen in the history of the Chinese national revolution]. Guomin xinbao [The new national journal].Google Scholar
Dazhao, Li. 1962. Li Dazhao xuanji [The selected works of Li Dazhao]. Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Junhu, Li. 1961. “‘Hongdengzhao’ de lingxiu—Huanglian shengmu” [The leader of the Red Lanterns—Holy Mother Lotus Huang]. Tianjin ribao [Tianjin daily], August 5.Google Scholar
Shu, Li. 1989. “Zhong-Xi wenhua wenti” [The question of Chinese and Western cultures]. Lishi yanjiu [Historical studies] No. 3:50–55.Google Scholar
Wenhai, Li and Yangdong, Liu. 1987. “Yihetuan yundong shiqi shehui xinli fenxi” [A social-psychological analysis of the Boxer movement era]. In Zhongguo Yihetuan yundong shi yanjiuhui, comp., Yihetuan yundong yu jindai Zhongguo shehui [The Boxer movement and modern Chinese society]. Chengdu: Sichuan Sheng Shehui Kexueyuan Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zonglin, Liao. 1985. “Tan gengzi shibianzhong de aiguo yu maiguo wenti” [A discussion of the question of patriotism and betrayal during the 1900 incident]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], November 27, p. 3.Google Scholar
Lishixi qi'erji gongnongbing xueyuan. 1975. “Fandi fanfeng po gangchang—Yihetuan de fan-Kong douzheng” [Oppose imperialism, oppose feudalism, destroy the feudal ethical code—The Boxers' struggle against Confucius]. Zhongshan Daxue xuebao [Zhongshan University journal] No. 1:93–96.Google Scholar
Rong, Liu and Fen, Xu. 1975. “Hongdeng nü 'er song” [In praise of the daughters of the Red Lantern]. Tianjin shiyuan xuebao [Tianjin Teachers College journal] No. 2:78–82, 77.Google Scholar
Xinwu, Liu. 1987. “What is ‘New’ in Post-Mao Literature?” Talk given at Harvard University, October 6.Google Scholar
Chi, Long. 1926. “Feiyue yundong yu jiuqi jinian” [The treaty abolition movement and the commemoration of September 7]. Xiangdao zhoubao [The guide weekly] No. 170:1726–27.Google Scholar
Xun, Lu. 1918. “Suiganlu” [Random thoughts] No. 37. Xin qingnian [New youth] 5.5:514–15.Google Scholar
Xun, Lu. 1919. Untitled response to Chen Tiesheng article. Xin qingnian [New youth] 6.2:219–21.Google Scholar
Lutz, Jessie Gregory. 1988. Chinese Politics and Christian Missions: The Anti-Christian Movements of 1920-28. Notre Dame: Cross Cultural Publications. “Making Things Move” [cartoon]. 1927. North-China Daily News, January 27.Google Scholar
Myerhoff, Barbara. 1978. Number Our Days. New York: Simon and Schuster. Nation, The. 1927. February 23, April 13, April 20.Google Scholar
[PENG] Shuzhi, . 1924. “Diguozhuyi yu Yihetuan yundong” [Imperialism and the Boxer movement]. Xiangdao zhoubao [The guide weekly] No. 81:646–52.Google Scholar
Benyu, Qi. 1967. “Aiguozhuyi haishi maiguozhuyi? —Ping fandong yingpian Qinggong mishi” [Patriotism or national betrayal? —On the reactionary film Inside Story of the Qing Court]. Hongqi [Red flag] No. 5 (March):9–23. Reprinted in Renmin ribao [People's Daily], April 1, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Qizhang, Qi. 1980. “Guanyu Yihetuan yundong pingjia de ruogan wenti” [Certain problems concerning appraisal of the Boxer movement]. Dongyue luncun [Dongyue essays]. No. 4:97–104.Google Scholar
[Qu] Qiubai, . 1925. “Yihetuan yundong zhi yiyi yu Wusa yundong zhi qiantu” [The significance of the Boxer movement and the future of the May Thirtieth Movement]. Xiangdao zhoubao [The guide weekly] No. 128:1167–72.Google Scholar
Renmin ribao [People's daily]. 1967. April, May.Google Scholar
Rigby, Richard W. 1980. The May Thirtieth Movement: Events and Themes. Folkestone, Kent: Dawson and Sons.Google Scholar
Rodzinski, Witold. 1979. A History of China, Vol. 1. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Laurence A. 1971. Ku Chieh-kang and China's New History: Nationalism and the Quest for Alternative Traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shandong Yihetuan anjuan [Archives on the Shandong Boxers]. 1980. Ed. by yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan jindaishibianjishi, jindaishi ziliao. 2 vols. Jinan: Qilu Shushe.Google Scholar
Shandong Yihetuan diaocha ziliao xuanbian [Selections from survey materials on the Shandong Boxers]. 1980. Ed. by jiaoyanshi, Shandong Daxue lishixi Zhongguo jindaishi. Jinan: Qilu Shushe.Google Scholar
“Shei shi Yihetuan” [Who is the Boxer?] [cartoon]. 1925. Guowen zhoubao [National news weekly] 2.23:24.Google Scholar
Shue, Vivienne. 1991. “Powers of State, Paradoxes of Dominion: China 1949-1979” In Lieberthal, KennethKallgren, JoyceMacFarquhar, Roderick and Wakeman, Frederic Jr., eds., Perspectives on Modern China: Four Anniversaries. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Jiaheng, Song and Yu, Pan. 1960. “Yihetuan yundongzhong de funii qunzhong” [The female masses in the Boxer movement]. Shandong Daxue xuebao [Shandong University journal] No. 2:54–60.Google Scholar
Spence, Jonathan. 1969. To Change China: Western Advisers in China 1620-1960. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Daren, Sun. 1967. “‘Hongdengzhao’ geming zaofan jingshen song” [In praise of the revolutionary rebel spirit of the “Red Lanterns”]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], April 27.Google Scholar
Zhanyuan, Sun. 1990. “Shinianlai Yihetuan yundong yanjiu shuping” [A review of research on the Boxer movement during the past decade]. Xin Hua wenzhai [New China digest] No. 9:69–72 (excerpted from Shandong shehui kexue [Shandong social science], 1990, No. 3).Google Scholar
Zuomin, Sun. 1982. “Guanyu Yihetuan yundong pingjia de jige wenti” [A few questions concerning appraisal of the Boxer movement]. In Yihetuan yundong shi taolun wenji [Collected articles on the history of the Boxer movement]. Jinan: Qilu Shushe.Google Scholar
Tianjin tielu diyi zhongxue lilun yanjiu xiaozu. 1974. “Yihetuan fandi sao Qingchao– Hongdengzhao pi Ru po lijiao” [The Boxers opposed imperialism and swept away the Qing—The Red Lanterns assailed the Confucians and broke out of the conventional moral code]. Tianjin ribao [Tianjin daily], September 24, p. 2.Google Scholar
Tiansheng, . 1925. “Duiyu yang Yihetuan zhi suo gan” [My reactions to the foreign Boxers]. Guowen zhoubao [National news weekly] 2.22:2.Google Scholar
Zhizhong, Wang. 1980a. “Fengjian mengmeizhuyi yu Yihetuan yundong” [Feudal obscurantism and the Boxer movement]. Lishi yanjiu [Historical studies] No. 1:41–54.Google Scholar
Zhizhong, Wang. 1980b. “‘Hongdengzhao’ kaolüe” [A brief examination of the “Red Lanterns”]. Shehui kexue [Social science] (Gansu) No. 2:63–69, 85.Google Scholar
Zhizhong, Wang. 1980c. “Ye tan ruhe pingjia Yihetuan yundong” [A further word on how to appraise the Boxer movement]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], August 19.Google Scholar
Zhizhong, Wang. 1983. “Lun Yihetuan yundong de fandi zuoyong” [The anti-imperialist role of the Boxer movement]. Shehui kexue [Social science] (Gansu) No. 3:56–66.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey. N.d. “The Boxers as Symbol: The Use and Abuse of the Yi He Tuan.” Unpublished paper. Cited with author's permission.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey. 1987. “‘Civilization’ and Its Discontents: The Boxers and Luddites as Heroes and Villains.” Theory and Society 16:675–707.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey. 1992. “Afterword: History, Myth, and the Tales of Tiananmen.” In Wasserstrom, Jeffrey N. and Perry, Elizabeth J., eds., Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning from 1989. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wieger, Léon, ed. 1925. Chine moderne, Vol. 6. Hien-hien [Xianxian]: Imprimerie de Hien-hien.Google Scholar
Witke, Roxane. 1977. Comrade Chiang Ch'ing. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
SHIYING, Wu. 1984. “Yihetuan yundong shi baokan wenzhang suoyin” [A listing of newspaper and periodical articles on the history of the Boxer movement]. In Yihetuan yundong shi lunwen xuan [Selected essays on the history of the Boxer movement]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Wenying, Wu. 1967. “Hongdengzhao” [The red lanterns]. Beijing ribao [Beijing daily], April 27, p. 4.Google Scholar
Yannan, Wu. 1976. “Yihetuan yundong he fan-Kong douzheng” [The Boxer movement and the anti-Confucian struggle]. Jilin Shida xuebao [Jilin Normal University journal] No. 3:60–62, 81.Google Scholar
Renwu, Xiao. 1967. “Weida de Yihetuan yundong” [The great Boxer movement]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], August 30.Google Scholar
Xiantian, Xue. 1980. “Hailanpao can'an sinan renshu jiujing you duoshao?” [How many people actually died in the Hailanpao massacre?]. Lishi yanjiu [Historical studies] No. 1:173–76.Google Scholar
Xiantian, Xue. 1981. “Jiangdong Liushisitun can'an yanjiu” [A study of the massacre at the Sixty-four Villages of Jiangdong]. Jindaishi yanjiu [Modern historical studies] No. 1:235–54.Google Scholar
Yihetuan shiliao [Historical materials on the Boxers]. 1982. Ed. by Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Jindaishi Yanjiusuo “Jindaishi ziliao” bianjizu. 2 vols. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yihetuan yundong [The Boxer movement]. 1972. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yihetuan zai Tianjin de fandi douzheng [The anti-imperialist struggle of the Boxers in Tianjin]. 1973. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
“Zan ‘Hongdengzhao’ ” [In praise of the “Red Lanterns”]. 1967. Wenhuibao, April 14. Reprinted in Renmin ribao [People's daily], April 17, 1967, p. 3.Google Scholar
Jing, Zhao. 1967. “Yihetuan shi geming de!” [The Boxers are revolutionary!]. Guangming ribao [Guangming daily], April 24, p. 4.Google Scholar
Zhiyan, (One with exceptional insight). 1918. “Yihequan zhengfule yangren” [The Boxers' conquest of the Westerners]. Meizhou pinglun [The weekly critic] No. 1 (December 22). Reprinted in Chen Duxiu, Duxiu wencun [Collected writings of Chen Duxiu], juan 2, pp. 1–2 (Suiganlu section).Google Scholar
Zhong, E. 1975. “Huangyan yan'gaibuliao lishi—Bo Suxiu wumie Yihetuan he meihua lao shahuang de miulun” [Lies cannot cover up history—A refutation of Soviet revisionism's fallacies of slandering the Boxers and prettifying the old czars]. Lilun xuexi [Theory and study] No. 5:66–72, 62.Google Scholar
Zhongguo Yihetuan yundong shi yanjiuhui, comp. 1987. Yihetuan yundong yu jindai Zhongguo shehui [The Boxer movement and modern Chinese society]. Chengdu: Sichuan Sheng Shehui Kexueyuan Chubanshe.Google Scholar