Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:42:41.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vernacular and Classical Ritual in Taoism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Kristofer Schipper
Get access

Abstract

Rituals that accompany community celebrations in China come in two kinds: vernacular and classical. The reason why these two forms exist is not easily explained. To the two forms of liturgy correspond two kinds of specialists: the tao-shi (Taoist dignitary) and the fa-shih (Master of rites). Both are commonly called “master,” and their practices are often confused by laymen. In fact, the two traditions are opposite and rivaling, but they are also largely complementary. This article, which is mainly based on fieldwork in southern Taiwan during the 1960s, explores both traditions, but emphasizes the lesser known vernacular one. An attempt is made to assess how widespread this situation was in China, and how far back in history it can be traced. The story of Hsu Chia, Lao-tzu's illiterate servant, which is considered the origin of the vernacular tradition, is studied in detail.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , November 1985 , pp. 21 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Barclay, Thomas. 1923. Supplement to (Douglas'). Dictionary of the Vernacular of Amoy. London.Google Scholar
De Groot, J. J. M. 1881. De jaarlijkse feesten en gebruiken van de Emoy-Chineezen {The annual festivals and customs of the Amoy Chinese}. 2 vols. Batavia.Google Scholar
De Groot, J. J. M. 1892–1921. The Religious System of China. 6 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Douglas, Carstairs. 1893. Chinese-English Dictionary of the Vernacular of Amoy. London.Google Scholar
Dudbridge, Glen. 1978. The Legend of Miao-shan. London.Google Scholar
Kōjun, Fukui. 1951. “Shinsenten kō” [A study of the Shen-hsien chuan]. Tōhō shūkyō 1:1–20. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques. 1956. Les aspects économiques du Buddhisme dans la société chinoise du Ve au Xe siècle [The economical aspects of Buddhism in Chinese society from the fifth to the tenth centuries]. Saigon.Google Scholar
Granet, Marcel. 1925. “Remarques sur le taoïsme ancien” [Remarks on ancient Taoism]. Etudes sociologiques sur la Chine, pp. 243–51. Paris. Reprinted 1953.Google Scholar
Ching-lang, Hou. 1973. Monnaies d'offrande et la notion de trésorerie dans la religion chinoise [Sacrificial money and the concept of treasury in Chinese religion]. Paris.Google Scholar
Shih-ch'eng, Hsieh e.a. 1965. “T'ai-nan hsien Wang-yeh chih t'ung-chih chi fen-pen” [A statistical study of the distribution of Wang-yeh cults in Tainan County]. Nanying wen-hsien 9. Tainan.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973. “Rapports de symmétrie entre rites et mythes de peuples voisins” [Relations of symmetry of rites and myths between neighbor populations]. Anthropologie structurale, pp. 283–300. Paris.Google Scholar
Hsien-chang, Li. 1979. Bōsō shinkō no kenkyū [Studies in belief in Ma-tsu]. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Chih-wan, Liu. 1966. “Taiwan chih wen-shen miao” [The temples of the gods of epidemics on Taiwan]. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica 22: 53–95.Google Scholar
Chih-wan, Liu. 1974. “Lü-shan chiao chih shou-hun fa” [The rites of calling the souls of the Lü-shan tradition]. Chung-kuo min-chien hsin-yang lun-chi. Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica Monographs 22: 207–373.Google Scholar
Su-shang, Lü. 1961. Taiwan tien-ying hsi-chü shi [A history of cinema and drama in Taiwan]. Taipei.Google Scholar
By Maspero, Henri. 1981. Taoism and Chinese Religion. Trans, by Kierman, Frank A.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Ninji, Ofuchi. 1983. Chūgokujin no shūkyō girei [Religious rituals of the Chinese people]. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1965. “Wu-pai pen ‘koa-a-chheh’ mu-lu” [A catalogue of 500 ballad books]. Taiwan Fengwu 15, no. 4:41–60.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1971. “Démonologie chinoise” [Chinese demonology]. Génies, anges et démons. Sources Orientales 8:405–26. Editions du Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1974. “The Written Memorial in Taoist Ceremonies.” Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, ed. Wolf, Arthur, pp. 309–24. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1975. Le Fen-teng, rituel taoïste [The Fen-teng; a Taoist ritual]. Paris.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1977a. “Tōkō no shokunō no kansuru ni, san no kōsatsu” [Some remarks on the function of the Inspector of Merits]. Dōkyō no zōhōteki kenkyū, ed. Tadao, Sakai; trans. Fukui Shigemasa, pp. 252–90. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1977b. “Neighborhood Cult Associations in Traditional Tainan.” The City in Late Imperial China, ed. William Skinner, G., pp. 651–76; 796–73. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1981. “Taoist Ritual and Local Cults of the T'ang Dynasty.” Papers of the International Conference of Sinology, pp. 101–16. Academia Sinica, Taipei. N.B.: A revised version of this article is forthcoming in Tantric and Taoist Studies in Honour of R. A, Stein, ed. Strickmann, Michel, vol. 3, Brussels.Google Scholar
Schipper, Kristofer. 1982. Le corps taoïste [The Taoist body]. Paris.Google Scholar
Fu-chin, Shen. 1962. Ui-im po-kam [A phonological dictionary of Hokkien]. Chiayi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Stein, Rolf A. 1979. “Religious Taoism and Popular Religion from the Second to the Seventh Centuries.” Facets of Taoism, eds. Welch, Holmes H. and Seidel, Anna, pp. 63–81. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strickmann, Michel. 1978. “The Longest Taoist Scripture.” History of Religions 17, nos. 3–4. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strickmann, Michel. 1980. Le Taoïsme du Mao-chan [The Taoism of Mao-shan]. Paris.Google Scholar
Van der Loon, Piet. 1977. “Les origines rituelles du théâtre chinois” [The ritual origins of Chinese theater]. Journal Asiatique 265, nos. 1–2. Paris.Google Scholar
Van der Loon, Piet. 1979a. “A Taoist Collection of the Fourteenth Century.” Studia Sino-Mongolica (Festschrift für Herbert Franke) 25: 401–5.Google Scholar
Van der Loon, Piet. 1979b. “Chu Wen: A Play for the Shadow Theatre.” Occasional Papers of the European Association of Chinese Studies 2. European Association of Chinese Studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ying-chi, Wei. 1929. Fu-chien san-shen k'ao [A study of three gods of Fukien]. Canton.Google Scholar
Welch, Holmes H. 1970. “The Bellagio Conference on Taoist Studies.” History of Religions 9, nos. 2–3. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar