Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:03:35.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dephallicizing Women in Ryūkyō shinshi: A Critique of Gender Ideology in Japanese Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Chieko Ariga
Get access

Extract

In surveying the history of Japanese literature since the Meiji period (1868–1912), readers immediately recognize that Japanese literature has been approached most predominantly from the perspective of the question of the “modern.” Although specific subjects of focus have varied, the primary underlying question has been whether a literary work is “modern,” “premodern,” or “antimodern.” This approach has been so firmly embedded in the Japanese literary tradition that it has established itself as the most legitimate way to examine literature written after the Meiji period.

The issue of the “modern” is related to the question of Japanese modernization; it is unquestionably important and deserves full critical attention in view of the geopolitical position of Japan in Asia, affected by Western hegemonic power over the past few centuries. However, because of this exclusive focus, other significant questions, including questions related to gender, have escaped critical attention.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , August 1992 , pp. 565 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. “Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory.” Signs 13: 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michele. 1980. Women’s Oppression Today. London: Verso Editions and NLB.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. 1985. “Constructing the Subject: Deconstructing the Text.” In Newton, Judith and Rosenfelt, Deborah, eds., Feminist Criticism and Social Change. New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. 1981. “Castration or Decapitation?” Trans. Annette Kuhn. Signs 7: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, Rosalind. 1985. Female Desires. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Dalby, Liza Crihfield. 1983. Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan, vol. 3. s.v. “geisha.” Tokyo and New York: Kodansha Ltd. Pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1984. Pure Lust: Elemental Feminist Philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dore, R. P. 1965. Education in Tokugawa Japan. London: The Athlone Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Teresa L. 1988. “The Romance of Patriarchy: Ideology, Subjectivity, and Postmodern Feminist Cultural Theory.” Cultural Critique 10: 19–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Frederick. 1942. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. 1975. “Women and Madness: The Critical Phallacy.” Diacritics 5: 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Ed. Gordon, Colin, and trans. Gordon, Colin et al. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1961 and 1964. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Strachey, James, ed. and trans. Vol. 19 and Vol. 22. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Kazuhiko, Fukuda 1988. Edo no seiaiqaku [Sexology in the Edo period]. Tokyo: Kawade Shobo shinsha.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1985. “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debates.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the Other Woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian G.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This Sex which Is Not One. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kappeler, Susanne. 1986. The Pornography of Representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shuichi, Kato 1983. A History of Japanese Literature. Vol. 3: The Modern Years Tokyo, New York, and San Francisco: Kodansha International Ltd.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Kawahara 1963. Tenkanki no shisō [Ideology at the turning point]. Tokyo: Waseda Daigaku Shuppanbu.Google Scholar
Toshirō, Kōno, et al. 1975. Gendai nihon bungaku kōza: Meiji no bungaku [A course on modern Japanese literature: Meiji literature]. Tokyo: ShibundōGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1977. About Chinese Women. Trans. Barrows, Anita. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986. “Stabat Mater.” In Moi, Toril, ed., The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, 1977. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. Bell, James Harle and Sturmer, John Richard Von; ed. Needham, Rodney. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. 1978. A Theory of Literary Production. Trans. Wall, Geoffrey. London, Henley, and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ai, Maeda 1964. “Hankyō zakki to Ryūkyō shinshi” [Pan-ch’iao tsa-chi and Ryūkyō shinshi]. Kokugo to Kokubungaku,’ pp. 36–48.Google Scholar
Ai, Maeda 1976. Narushima Ryuhoku. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbunsha.Google Scholar
Markus, Andrew. 1989- “Shogakai: Celebrity Banquets of the Late Edo Period.” Paper presented at the 199th Meeting of the American Oriental Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 1989.Google Scholar
Hakuchō, Masamune 1926. “Bungei jihyō: Tsuchi to Kafūshū” [Comments on current literature: Soils and Collected Works of Kafū]. Chūōkoron (March): 131–40.Google Scholar
Junko, Minamoto 1991. “Nihon no hinkon naru seifudo” [The poor landscape of sexuality in Japan]. In Akiko, Yamashita, ed., Nihonteki Sekushuariti: Feminisumu Karano seifūdo hihan. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1974. Psychoanalysis and Feminism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet and Rose, Jacqueline 1982. Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the Ecole Freudienne. New York: Pantheon Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masao, Miyoshi 1991. Off Center: Power and Culture Relations between Japan and the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yukio, Miyoshl 1972. Nihon bungaku no kindai to hankindai [The modern and anti-modern in Japanese literature], Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Mitsuo, Nakamura 1963. Meiji bungakushi [Literary history of Meiji]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Google Scholar
Yukihiko, Nakamura 1966. Gesakuron [Treatise on Gesaku]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Eizō, Nakano 1968. Kuruwa no seikatsu [The life at licensed quarters]. Tokyo: Yuzankaku.Google Scholar
Eizō, Nakano 1981. Yūjo no seikatsu [The life of courtesans]. Tokyo: Yūzankaku.Google Scholar
Ryūhoku, Narushima 1874. Ryūkyō shinshi [The new record of prosperous Yanagibashi]. 2 vols. Tokyo: Yamashiroya.Google Scholar
Ryūhoku, Narushima 1970. Ryūkyō shinshi. In Kaname, Okitsu and Ai, Maeda, eds., Nihon kindai bungaku taikei 1: Meiji kaikaki bungakushū [Comprehensive collections of modern Japanese literature 1: Meiji enlightened period literature]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Newton, Judith and Rosenfelt, Deborah 1985. Feminist Criticism and Social Change. New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Matsunosuke, Nishiyama 1963. Kuruwa [Licensed quarters]. Tokyo: Shibundō.Google Scholar
Matsunosuke, Nishiyama 1979. Yūjo [The women of pleasure]. Tokyo: Kondō Shuppansha.Google Scholar
Haruo, Ochi 1965. “Narushima Ryuhoku ni okeru hankindai” [The anti-modern in Narushima Ryūhoku]. Kokubungaku (April):32–39.Google Scholar
Haruo, Ochi 1975. Nihon no koten: Kindai bungaku no tanjō [Japanese classics: the birth of modern literature]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Ógoshi Aiko, Minamot O Junko and Akiko, Yamashita 1991. Seisabetsusura Bukkyō [Sexual discrimination in Buddhism]. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Google Scholar
Omvedt, Gail. 1986. “‘Patriarchy’: The Analysis of Women’s Oppression.” The Insurgent Sociologist (Spring):30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggi, Dominique. 1981. “A Defense of the Master-Slave Relationship.” In Marks, Elaine and Courtivron, Isabelle de, eds., New French Feminisms. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Reiter, Rayna R., ed., Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jay. 1984. Injurious to Public Morals: Writers and the Meiji State. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 1974. Religion and Sexism. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tamiko, Seki 1980. Edo kōki no joseitachi [Women in the late Edo period]. Tokyo: Aki Shobō.Google Scholar
Ryōhei, Shioda 1941. “Ryūkyō shinshi zenpen no genkei ni tsuite” [About the original manuscript of the first volume of Ryūkyō shinshi]. Bungaku (August): 169–78.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1981. “French Feminism in an International Frame.” Yale French Studies 62: 154–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsu, Takenouchi 1972. Nihon yūjo ko. [History of the women of pleasure in Japan]. Tokyo: Kurieitosha.Google Scholar
Shigeyuki, Torihara 1931. Nakanu kago no tori [The caged birds that do not cry]. Tokyo: Shinseikai.Google Scholar
Yukiaki, Uemura 1929. Nihon yūrishi [History of pleasure quarter in Japan]. Tokyo: Shunyōdō.Google Scholar
Wad, A Shigejirō. 1950. “Ryūkyō shinshi ni okeru hihan seishin” [Critical spirit in Ryūkyō shinshi]. Bungaku (August): 11–21.Google Scholar
Huai, Yu. 1969. Pan-ch’iao tsa-chi. Trans. Shigeo, Matsueda et al. Chūgoku koten bungaku taikei. Vol. 56: Kiroku bungakushū. Tokyo: Heibonsha. Pp. 210–45.Google Scholar