Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:42:11.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On connectivity and robustness of random graphs with inhomogeneity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Yilun Shang*
Affiliation:
Northumbria University
*
*Postal address: Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, NE1 8ST, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Email address: yilun.shang@northumbria.ac.uk

Abstract

The study of threshold functions has a long history in random graph theory. It is known that the thresholds for minimum degree k, k-connectivity, as well as k-robustness coincide for a binomial random graph. In this paper we consider an inhomogeneous random graph model, which is obtained by including each possible edge independently with an individual probability. Based on an intuitive concept of neighborhood density, we show two sufficient conditions guaranteeing k-connectivity and k-robustness, respectively, which are asymptotically equivalent. Our framework sheds some light on extending uniform threshold values in homogeneous random graphs to threshold landscapes in inhomogeneous random graphs.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alon, N. (1995). A note on network reliability. In Discrete Probability and Algorithms (IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 72), eds D. Aldous et al., pp. 1114. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollobás, B., Janson, S. and Riordan, O. (2007). The phase transition in inhomogeneous random graphs. Random Structures Algorithms 31, 3122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, F. and Radcliffe, M. (2011). On the spectra of general random graphs. Electron. J. Combin. 18, P215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (1986). Connectivity of finite anisotropic random graphs and directed graphs. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 99, 315330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs, I. Publ. Math. Debrecen 6, 290297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. (1961). On the strength of connectedness of a random graph. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 12, 261267.10.1007/BF02066689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedgut, E. and Kalai, G. (1996). Every monotone graph property has a sharp threshold. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124, 29933002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieze, A. and Karoński, M. (2016). Introduction to Random Graphs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gilbert, E. N. (1959). Random graphs. Ann. Math. Statist. 30, 11411144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Ruciński, A. (2000). Random Graphs, John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovalenko, I. N. (1971). The theory of random graphs. Cybernet. Systems Anal. 7, 575579.10.1007/BF01071028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc, H., Zhang, H., Koutsoukos, X. and Sundaram, S. (2013). Resilient asymptotic consensus in robust networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 31, 766781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustafa, A., Modares, H. and Moghadam, R. (2020). Resilient synchronization of distributed multi-agent systems under attacks. Automatica 115, 108869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, Y. (2016). Bounding extremal degrees of edge-independent random graphs using relative entropy. Entropy 18, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, Y. (2018). Resilient consensus of switched multi-agent systems. Systems Control Lett. 122, 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, Y. (2022). Resilient cluster consensus of multiagent systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 52, 346356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usevitch, J. and Panagou, D. (2020). Determining r- and (r,s)-robustness of digraphs using mixed integer linear programming. Automatica 111, 108586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Fata, E. and Sundaram, S. (2015). A notion of robustness in complex networks. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 2, 310320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar