Skip to main content Accessibility help

Weed management in sorghum-legume intercropping systems

  • C. T. Abraham (a1) and S. P. Singh (a1)


The field experiments were conducted at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi in summer-rainy seasons of 1980 and 1981 to study the effect of different sorghum-legume intercropping systems and weed control methods on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by different crops and on weeds. The intercropping of legumes increased growth, uptake of N, P and K and yield of sorghum compared with sole sorghum. However, maximum increase was obtained when it was grown in association with fodder cow pea. All intercrops smothered the weeds but maximum suppression was by fodder cow pea. The total uptake of nutrients (N, P and K) was also greater in intercropping systems. Pre-emergence application of fluchloralin at 0·5 kg/ha was most effective in all intercropping systems followed by nitrofen at 1·0 kg/ha. Hand weeding and fluchloralin application also led to higher nutrient uptake by sorghum and the whole system than the unweeded control. Application of fluchloralin and nitrofen controlled most of the weeds and reduced nutrient removal compared with the control but was less effective than hand weeding.



Hide All
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Methods of Analysis, 9th edn. Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Black, C. C, Chen, T. M. & Brown, R. H. (1969). Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Science 17, 338344.
International Crops Research Institute For The Semi-Arid Tropics (1979). Farming systems - agronomy and weed science. Annual Report 1978–79, pp. 213219.
International Rice Research Institute (1980). Cropping systems programme. Annual Report 1979–80, pp. 414427.
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis, 2nd edn.New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.
Kolar, J. S., Singh, M., Sandhu, K. S. & Sidhu, A. S. (1979). Studies on weed control in mungbean (Vigna radiata var. aureus). Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University 16, 1418.
Okibo, B. N. (1979). Evaluation of plant interactions and productivity in complex mixtures as a basis for improved cropping systems design. In International Intercropping Workshop (Proceedings) held at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, on 10–13 January, pp. 155179.
Patterson, D. T. (1982). Shading response of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculenlus). Weed Science 30, 2530.
Prakash, J. & Pahwa, S. K. (1979). Integration of cultural and chemical methods for effective weed control in mung and mash. Indian Weed Science Society Annual Meeting, Abstracts, p. 30.
Rao, A. N. & Shetty, S. V. R. (1981). Investigation on weed suppressing ability of smother cropping systems in relation to canopy development and light interception. In 8th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference (Proceedings), pp. 357364.
Singh, S. P. (1981). Studies on spatial arrangement in sorghum-legume intercropping system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 655661.
Snaydon, R. W. & Harris, P. M. (1979). Interactions below ground - the use of nutrients and water. In International Intercropping Workshop (Proceedings) held al ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, on 10–13 January, pp. 188201.
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26, 177210.
Waghmare, A. B., Krishnan, T. K. & Singh, S. P. (1982). Crop compatibility and spatial arrangement in sorghum-based intercropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 621629.
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping - its importance and research needs. Part I. Competitions and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32, 113.

Weed management in sorghum-legume intercropping systems

  • C. T. Abraham (a1) and S. P. Singh (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed