Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:53:54.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations among heads, plants, and ecotypes of wild safflower

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Kheradnam
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran
A. Bassiri
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran

Summary

Seeds from individual heads of wild safflower (Carihamus oxyacantha Bieb.) plants collected from five locations were used in this study. Locations were situated on a roughly east-west transect passing through Shiraz, Iran. The western locations were cooler with higher annual rainfall than the eastern sites. Wild safflower plants of different locations produced about an average of 150 heads per plant, but only 60% of them contained seeds. Frequency distributions constructed for number of seeds per head, germination percentage, and seedling length showed trends of change in the skewness of the distribution for the latter two characteristics parallel to the environmental selective pressure, i.e. the skewness was towards the left for eastern locations but it gradually moved to the right for western ones. Striking amounts of polymorphism were also observed for these characters. A very high proportion of total variance was concerned with differences between heads of the same plant for number of seeds, germination ercentage, and seedling length. Very little variability was found among plants of the same ecotype.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashri, A. & Knowles, P. F. (1960). Cytogenetics of safflower (Carthamus L.) species and their hybrids. Agronomy Journal 52, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A. (1977). Identification and polymorphism of cultivars and wild ecotypes of safflower based on isozyme patterns. Euphytica 26, 709719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A. & Kheradnam, M. (1976). Kelationships between seed color and viability, germination and seedling growth of wild safflower ecotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 56, 911917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A., Khosh-Khui, M. & Rouhani, I. (1976). The influence of simulated moisture stress conditions and osmotic substrates on germination and growth of cultivated and wild safflowers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A. & Rouhani, I. (1976). Effect of seed treatment on germination of wild safflower. Weed Science 24, 233234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A., Rouhani, I. & Ghorashy, S. R. (1975). Effect of temperature and scarification on germination and emergence of wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 84, 239243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiri, A. & Sionit, N. (1975). Emergence and seedling growth of a cultivated and a wild strain of safflower under various amounts of simulated rainfall. Physiologia Plantarum 34, 226229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, M. T. & Allard, R. W. (1972). Patterns of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69, 18201824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Despande, R. B. (1952). Wild safflower (Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.) a possible oil seed crop for the desert and arid regions. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 12, 1014.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J. S. & Arthur, A. E. (1972). Variation in wild population of Papaver dubium. IV. A survey of variation. Heredity 28, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. & Allard, R. W. (1972). Microgeographical variation in allozyme frequencies in Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69, 21002104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, J. L. & Williams, J. T. (1965). Seed polymorphism and germination. I. The influence of nitrates and low temperatures on the germination of Chenopodium album. Weed Research 5, 141150.Google Scholar
Imrie, B. C. & Knowles, P. F. (1970). Inheritance studies in interspecific hybrids between Carthamus flavescens and C. tinctorius. Crop Science 10, 349352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, P. F. (1958). Safflower. Advances in Agronomy 10, 289323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupsow, A. I. (1932). The geographical variability of the species Carthamus tinctorius L. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding 9, 99181. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Lawrence, M. J. (1965). Variation in wild populations of Papaver dubium. I. Variation within populations; dialled crosses. Heredity 20, 183204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, M. J. (1969). Variation in wild populations of Papaver dubium. II. Variation between populations. Heredity 24, 337346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, M. J. (1972). Variation in wild populations of Papaver dubium. III. The genetics of stigmatic ray number, height and capsule number. Heredity 28, 71100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, E. L., Landers, R. Q. & Mahlstede, J. P. (1968). Variation in seed weight and germination in populations of Amaranlhus retroflexus L. Ecology 49, 290296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergen, F. (1963). Ecotypic variation in Pinus strobus L. Ecology 44, 716727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmblad, I. G. (1969). Populational variation in germination of weedy species. Ecology 50, 746748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, J. T. & McMillan, C. (1965). Ecotypic differentiation in Prosopis (Mesquite). Ecology 46, 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 776 p. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Wulff, R. (1973). Intrapopulational variation in the germination of seeds in Hyptis suaveolens. Ecology 54, 646649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar