Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:18:34.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in the Chemical Composition of the Swede

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. H. Collins
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Agricultural Chemistry, Armstrong College, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Extract

That swedes are better feeding materials under some conditions than under others is more or less generally recognised; the suggestion of controlling these conditions is perhaps not new, but little of practical importance has been achieved in this direction. About five years ago the subject was considered at the Durham College of Science (now Armstrong College), Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and experiments were started which have been repeated and added to every season. The object of these investigations was to form a list of the different varieties of swedes in order of merit. Incidentally other points of interest have arisen, and are dealt with in the following pages. The results of these experiments have been published each year in the Annual Report of the Agricultural Department of the College, but a review of the work done seems of sufficient general importance to prove interesting to a larger circle of readers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 80 note 1 Annual Report, 1902, and Bulletin, 1904.

page 91 note 1 Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, 1902, p. 1514.

page 92 note 1 “Variation” is used to express “variation (or difference) in the percentage of dry matter in swedes”; “variety” to express “the variety (or kind) of swede.”

page 92 note 2 Cambridge Philosophical Society's Proceedings, March, 1903.

page 97 note 1 A shorter calculation is

page 98 note 1 +1·23–(–0·45)=1·68 and +1·36–(–0·59)=1·95.

page 98 note 2 loc. cit.

page 100 note 1 12·06+0·33=12·39.

page 101 note 1 Report of the Agricultural Department of the Durham College of Science, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, for 1901, p. 97.