Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:47:10.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of artificially dried grass, silage made with added molasses and A.I.V. fodder in the diet of the dairy cow and their effect on the quality of the milk, with special reference to the value of the non-protein nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. J. Watson
Affiliation:
(Imperial Chemical Industries, Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks)
W. S. Ferguson
Affiliation:
(Imperial Chemical Industries, Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks)

Extract

An experiment has been carried out with dairy cows to measure the value of artificially dried grass, silage made with added molasses and A.I.V. fodder (silage made with mineral acid in quantity sufficient to bring the pH of the mass to between 3·0 and 4·0) in the diet, on the yield and quality of the milk. A preliminary period of 3 weeks when all cows were on the control diet was followed by an experimental period of 17 weeks. There were four treatments: a control ration consisting of hay, roots and concentrates; one in which artificially dried grass replaced part of the concentrates; a third in which molassed silage was fed; and a fourth including A.I.V. fodder. There were originally five blocks of four cows each, the four treatments being randomised in each block, each block of cows standing together in the cowshed to eliminate any possible effect of position. One block went dry after 8 weeks, but the remaining four blocks completed the experiment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Watson, S. J. and Ferguson, W. S.J. agric. Sci. (1936), 26, 189.Google Scholar
(2)Bartlett, M. S.J. agric. Sci. (1935), 25, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Ehrenberg, P. and Scholz, A.Biochem. Z. (1934), 270, 188.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, P., MÜLLER, B., Dietrichs, F. and Hötzel, K.Tierernährung (1934), 6, 425.Google Scholar
(4)Kirsch, W. and Jantzon, H.Z. Zücht. B (1933), 28, 451.Google Scholar
(5)Kirsch, W. and Jantzon, H.Fütterkonservierung (1933), 47, 79.Google Scholar
(6)Wright, N. C. Unpublished information.Google Scholar
(7)Edin, H., Berglund, N. and Andersson, Y.Medd. CentAnst. Försöksv. Jordbr., Stockh. (1933), No. 431, pp. 99.Google Scholar
(8)Virtanen, A. I.Emp. J. exp. Agric. (1933), 1, 143.Google Scholar
(9)Virtanen, A. I.Acta chem. Fenn. (1933), A 6Google Scholar
(10)Foreman, F. W.Biochem. J. (1920), 14, 451–73; (1928), 22, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Woodman, H. E.J. agric. Sci. (1925), 15, 343.Google Scholar
(12)Rations for Livestock (1934). London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(13)Wiegner, G.Anleitung zum quantitativen agrikulturchemischen Praktikum (1926), p. 249. Berlin: Gebrüder Bornträeger.Google Scholar
(14)Kellner, O.Scientific Feeding of Animals (1915). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
(15)Watson, S. J. and Horton, E. A.J. agric. Sci. (1936), 26, 142.Google Scholar
(16)Report of Departmental Committee on the Rationing of Dairy Cows (1925), p. 9. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(17)Ferguson, W. S.Analyst (1935), 60, 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Watson, S. J.Biochem. J. (1934), 28, 1076.Google Scholar
(19)Nicholson, M. N. and Lesser, C. E.Bull. Dep. of Agric. Univ. Reading (1934), No. 46.Google Scholar
(20)Watson, S. J., Drummond, J. C, Heilbron, I. M. and Morton, R. A.Emp. J. exp. Agric. (1933), 1, 68.Google Scholar
(21)Brouwer, E.Tierernährung (1935), 7, 1.Google Scholar
(22)Kellner, O., Köhler, A., Barnstein, F., Zielstorff, W., Ewert, A. and Wedemeyer, K.Z. Biol. (1900). From Biederm. Zbl. (1901), 30, 460.Google Scholar
(23)Watson, S. J. and Ferguson, W. S.I.C.I. Ltd. A.R.A. Report (1936), No. 425.Google Scholar
(24)Kirsch, W.Landw. VersSta. (1935), 123, 82.Google Scholar