Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:42:38.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of grass-silage nitrogen by growing sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Elisabeth Grenet
Elisabeth Grenet
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches Zootechniques et Vétérinaires, Theix – 63110 Beaumont, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The digestibility, the voluntary intake and the nitrogen balance of 108 diets corresponding to 94 silages prepared from 20 fresh crops were measured in growing sheep. Series of silages were made from the same fresh forage. Each series included two controls: a direct-cut silage without additive and a direct-cut silage with formic acid, with a variable number of experimental silages with different additives.

Rumen ammonia concentration, measured on rumen-fistulated sheep, decreased when an additive was used. It increased with nitrogen intake and was inversely related to the organic-matter digestibility and the crude-fibre digestibility. It varied with the silage composition.

The crude-protein digestibility of direct-cut silages without additives was similar to or slightly higher than the crude-protein digestibility of the fresh crops. The addition of formic acid depressed the digestibility, but the addition of formaldehyde decreased it even more. The urinary nitrogen loss was higher for silages without additive than for the fresh crops and was decreased by the addition of formic acid. The addition of formaldehyde to formic acid had an additive effect.

Retained nitrogen was lower in silages without additives (12% of nitrogen intake) than in parent crops (15·7%). It increased when formic acid (15·8%) was added. The addition of formaldehyde at a low rate (1·5 l/t green fodder) to the formic acid did not increase the nitrogen retention whether expressed in g/day or as percentage of nitrogen intake, but the addition of formaldehyde at a high rate (3·5 l/t green fodder) to formic acid decreased nitrogen retention. The other additives based on cereals or whey did not improve the nitrogen balance compared with formic acid. Nitrogen retention differed according to plant species.

Retained nitrogen increased with digestible organic-matter intake and nitrogen intake. It increased with the silage water-soluble carbohydrate content. The higher the silage fermentation product content (ammonia, lactic acid, propionic acid), the lower the retained nitrogen. It appears that the nitrogen value of silages can be high provided that the silages are well preserved and that excessive protein breakdown is avoided.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 43 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, H. A. (1961). Fermentations of nitrogenous organic compounds. In The Bacteria, II, Metabolism (ed. Gunsalus, I. C. and Stanier, R. Y.), p. 151. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barker, J. B. & Summerson, W. H. (1941). The coloric determination of lactic acid in biological materials. Journal of Biological Chemistry 137, 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1975). Effect of treatment with formaldehyde, formic acid and formaldehyde-acid mixtures on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage. II. Mature herbage. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Cook, J. E. & Wilkins, R. J. (1978). The influence of formic acid and formaldehyde additives and type of harvesting machine on the utilization of nitrogen in lucerne silages. 1. The voluntary intake and nitrogen retention of young sheep consuming the silages with and without intraperitoneal supplements of DL-methionine. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Cammel, S. B. & Harrison, D. G. (1977). The digestion by sheep of silages made with and without the addition of formaldehyde. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. C. & Valentine, S. C. (1972). Formaldehyde as a silage additive. I. The chemical composition and nutritive value of frozen lucerne, lucerne silage, and formaldehyde-treated lucerne silage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 1093–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpintero, C. M., Henderson, A. R. & McDonald, P. (1979). The effect of some pre-treatments on proteolysis during the ensiling of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 34, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Hibbs, J. W., Pratt, A. D. & Davis, R. R. (1961). Nitrogen metabolism in dairy cattle. I. The influence of grain and meadow crops harvested as hay, silage, or soilage on efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. 4th edn.London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Demarquilly, C., Grenet, E. & Dulphy, J. P. (1977). The effect of addition of formic acid, with or without formalin, on the conservation quality, digestibility, nutritive value, and nitrogen balance of direct-cut silages. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Grassland Congress, Leipzig, pp. 1297–1300.Google Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Weiss, P. (1970). Tableaux de la Valeur Alimentaire des Fourrages Verts. Etude S.E.I, no. 42. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Demarquilly, C. & Henry, M. (1975). Perte de composes volatils lors de la determination a l'étuve de la teneur en matière sèche des ensilages. Annales de Zootechnie 24, 743–756.Google Scholar
Durand, M., Zelter, S. Z. & Tisserand, J. L. (1968). Influence de quelques techniques de conservation sur l'efficacité de l'azote de la luzerne chez le mouton. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 8, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R., Hilton, M. G. & Waller, J. M. (1976). The end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acide by Clostridia. Archives of Microbiology 107, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Hemsley, J. A. & Reis, P. J. (1967). Nutrition and wool growth. The effect of protecting dietary protein from microbial degradation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Science 30, 215–217.Google Scholar
Gill, M., Ulyatt, M. J. & Barry, T. N. (1979). Effect on digestion by sheep of treatment of silage with a formaldehyde–formic acid mixture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 221–225.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. & Demarquilly, C. (1977). Utilisation de l'azote des fourrages verts par le mouton encroissance. Influence du stade de végétation, de l'espèce fourragère, de la fertilisation azotée et de l'addition d'orge. Annales de Zootechnie 26, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (1978) (ed.). L'Alimentation des Ruminants. Versailles: INRA.Google Scholar
Jouany, J. P. (1981). Dosage des acides gras volatils et des alcools dans les ensilages par chromatographie en phase gazeuse. Bulletin Technique du CRZV de Theix, INRA 86, 63–66.Google Scholar
Lingvall, P. (1977). Comparison of formic acid and a formaldehyde-formic acid mixture as silage additives. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Grassland Congress, Leipzig, pp. 1301–1303.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. & Edwards, R. A. (1976). The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 205–211.Google Scholar
Mann, E. M. & McDonald, P. (1976). The effect of formalin and lower volatile fatty acids on silage fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 612–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noll, F. (1974). L-lactate determination with LDH, GPT and NAD. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis Vol. III (ed. Bergmeyer, H. U.), pp. 1475–1477. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oshima, M., McDonald, P. & Acamovic, T. (1979). Changes during ensilage in the nitrogenous components of fresh and additive treated ryegrass and lucerne. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, I. H. (1972). Nutritional evaluation of silage made from grass treated with a formalin-sulphuric acid mixture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 27, 195 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. (1973). The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers. 1. Empty body weight, dressed carcass weight and offal components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 201–210.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Evans, R. T. & Beever, D. E. (1979). The effect of formaldehyde treatment before ensiling on the digestion of wilted grass silage by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somogyi, S. (1952). Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry 105, 19–23.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (1968). The digestibility and utilization of fresh grass, hay and silage by sheep. Animal Production 10, 240 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. & Waldo, D. R. (1979). Effect of formaldehyde and formic acid treatment of orchardgrass silage and protein supplementation on energy and nitrogen retention of Holstein steers. Journal of Animal Science 49, Supplement 1, 71st ASAS Annual Meeting, 414–415.Google Scholar
Valentine, S. C. & Brown, D. C. (1973). Formaldehyde as a silage additive. II. The chemical composition and nutritive value of lucerne hay, lucerne silage, and formaldehyde and formic acid-treated lucerne silages. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 939–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vérité, R., Journet, M. & Jarrige, R. (1979). A new system for the protein feeding of ruminants: the PDI system. Livestock Production Science 6, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R. (1975). Silage and supplemental nitrogen solubility effects on heifer performance. Journal of Animal Science 41, 424 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Keys, J. E., Smith, L. W. & Gordon, C. H. (1971). Effect of formic acid on recovery, intake, digestibility and growth from unwilted silage. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R. & Tyrrell, H. F. (1980). The relation of insoluble nitrogen to gain, energy retention, and nitrogen retention in Holstein steers. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, EAAP, 1980, Braunschweig, pp. 572–581.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Wilson, R. F. & Woolford, M. K. (1974). The effects of formaldehyde on silage fermentation. Växtodling 29, Proceedings of the 5th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Uppsala, pp. 197–201.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M., Wilson, R. F. & Barry, T. N. (1976). Factors affecting the nutritive value of silage. Outlook on Agriculture 9, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, B. J. (1973 a). Formic acid as a silage additive for wet crops of cocksfoot and lucerne. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1973 b). Formic acid as a silage additive. I. Effects of formic acid on fermentation in laboratory silos. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. F. & Wilkins, R. J. (1977). The effects of mixtures of formalin and acid on silage fermentation. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Grassland Congress, Leipzig, pp. 1289–1292.Google Scholar