Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T14:08:13.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of electrophoretically labelled populations for intra-specific competition studies in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) swards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Elsie Quaite  and
M. S. Camlin
Elsie Quaite
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Botany, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT6 5PX
M. S. Camlin
Affiliation:
Agricultural Botany Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Plant Testing Station, Crossnacreevy, Castlereagh, Belfast, BT6 9SH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Genotypes homozygous for specific PGI2 alleles were selected from four existing cultivars of different maturities, Gremie, Aberystwyth S.321, Barlenna and Melle. Each of three groups of plants (early BB selected from Gremie, intermediate CC selected from Aberystwyth S.321 and Barlenna and late AA selected from Melle) was isolated and allowed to interpollinate producing three experimental seed lots or populations. These populations, screened for their electrophoretic purity, were found to exhibit only the selected parental PGI2 genotype.

The three labelled populations were sown in boxes in September 1982 as monocultures, as all possible 50:50 mixtures, and as a three-way mixture to produce miniswards. Following one harvest in the establishment year these were harvested and dry-matter yields determined on a monthly basis from April to October 1983, two horizons in the sward being examined separately at harvests 1–5. Changes in the proportions of populations in each mixture were monitored by random subsampling of the cut herbage and subsequent electrophoretic testing.

The ability to dominate productivity in the top horizon in mixtures was dependent on the timing of reproductive development of any particular population. The patterns of productivity in the bottom horizon and in both horizons combined showed the early population dominating the mixed swards briefly at the beginning of the harvest but the late population dominating from June–July onwards. The intermediate population, although the most productive in monoculture, did not reveal any tendency to dominate productivity in any of the mixtures.

The potential use of electrophoretically labelled cultivars to study complex aspects of plant competition is discussed, along with the possible application of results from these studies to agricultural practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 106 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 99 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Camlin, M. S. (1978). Spring growth and management of early, mid-season and late varieties of perennial ryegrass. Agriculture in Northern Ireland 52, 303–308.Google Scholar
Camlin, M. S. (1981). Competitive ability of cultivars of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). In Plant Physiology and Herbage Production (ed. Wright, C. E.), pp. 137–142. Occasional Symposium No. 13, British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
England, F. (1968). Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. Journal of Applied Ecology 5, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, A. L. (1960). A technique for the investigation of inter-cultivar competition in grass species. Proceedings of the Eighth International Grassland Congress, pp. 322–324.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. L. & Hunt, I. V. (1963). Inter-varietal competition in perennial ryegrass swards. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, T. J., Camlin, M. S. & Wright, C. E. (1982). Evaluation of phosphoglucoisomerase allozyme electrophoresis for the identification and registration of cultivars of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Seed Science and Technology 10 1–15.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. D., Gottlieb, L. D. & McAdam, N. J. (1978). Survival of allozyme variants in swards of Lolium perenne L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtung 81, 228–234.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. D. & McAdam, N. J. (1977). Isozyme polymorphism as a measure of distinctiveness and stability in cultivars of Lolium perenne L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtung 79, 59–68.Google Scholar
Jewiss, O. R. (1972). Tillering in grasses – its significance and control. Journal of the British Grassland Society 27, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. J. (1958). Grassland management. Transactions of the Royal Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland 3, 73–86.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. J. (1984). The use of electrophoresis in the study of competition between cultivars of perennial ryegrass sown as mixtures in the field. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. J., Gardiner, S. J., Gilliland, T. J. & Camlin, M. S. (1985). The use of electrophoretic techniques to distinguish perennial ryegrass cultivars when sown in mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. (1958). The reaction of different types of herbage plants to defoliation. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Durham.Google Scholar