Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T23:01:33.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urea as a fertilizer Laboratory and pot-culture studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Low  and
F. J. Piper
A. J. Low
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks
F. J. Piper
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A laboratory and pot-culture investigation to seek reasons for the variable response of grass and other crops to top-dressings of urea, and to the occasional phytotoxicity to seedlings of urea either mixed in the soil or drilled in contact with the seeds is described.

The part played by biuret, the chief impurity in commercial urea, has been examined. It can be phytotoxic to germinating seedlings when in contact, but in the quantities likely to be applied in agriculture in top-dressings, e.g. 150 lb. of urea with up to 2·5% of biuret, its effect is negligible. Up to at least 5% of biuret can be present in urea without affecting its ammonification or nitrification in soil.

It has been shown that loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere can account for the poorer responses of grassland to top-dressings of urea as compared with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ or ammonium sulphate.

The phytotoxic behaviour of pure urea to germinating seeds seems to be due to rapid production of ammonia. This gas is also evolved from topdressings of urea. Both the phytotoxicity and the loss to the atmosphere can be reduced by mixing urea with acid salts to neutralize the ammonia.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1961 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, F. E. (1955). Advanc. Agron. 7, 213.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Shaw, K. (1958). J. Agric.Sci. 51, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flieg, O. et al. (1939). Arbeiten der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsstation Limburgerhof.Google Scholar
Martin, J. P. & Chapman, J. D. (1951). Soil Sci. 71, 25.Google Scholar
Olsen, C. (1927). C.R. Lab., Carlsberg, 17, no. 3.Google Scholar
Reifer, I. & Melville, J.(1949). J. Biol.Chem. 178, 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotini, O. T. (1956). Ann. Fac. Agr., Pisa, 17, 1.Google Scholar
Rotini, O. T. & Lotti, G. (1956). Ann. Chim. 46, 440.Google Scholar
Starostka, R. W. & Clark, K. G. (1955). Agric. Chemic. 10, 49, 103.Google Scholar
Templeman, W. G. (1961). J. agric. Sci. 57.Google Scholar
Waksman, S. A. (1952). Soil Microbiology. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. p. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar