Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T08:42:49.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs: I. Relation to birth weight and subsequent growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Fraser
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, The King' Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland
R. Morley Jones
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, The King's Building, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS, Scotland

Summary

Teat orders were determined for 76 litters of Large White and Large White × Landrace pigs. Regression analysis within litters revealed a relationship between suckling position and weight both at birth (P<0·01) and at 3 weeks of age (P<0·001), with the heavier piglets tending to occupy the more anterior teats. The correlation coefficients, however, were very small (r = –0·16 and –0·22 respectively). The correlation between birth weight and 3-week weight was much larger (r = +0·47); and a comparison of pairs of litter-mates showed that a difference in birth weight of 0·25 kg or more persisted at 3 weeks in the majority of cases, regardless of which piglet suckled the more anterior teat. Birth weight accounted for much more of the variation in 3-week weight than did teat number, and, when the effect of birth weight had been taken into account, teat number accounted for only an additional 2·3% of the variation. Even so, the anterior teats did appear to confer some advantage which was independent of that of the birth weight of the piglets suckling these teats. From the results of this and other studies it is concluded that there is only a weak relationship between suckling position and weight at birth and 3 weeks. Other unidentified factors are probably of more importance for the within-litter variation in weight gain of suckling pigs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1955). Studies on milk production White pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 46, 97118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1937). The milk consumption and growth of suckling pigs. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 5, 349–60.Google Scholar
England, D. C., Bertun, P. L., Chapman, V. M. & Miller, J. C. (1961). Nursing position of baby pigs in relation to birth weight. Journal of Animal Science 20, 682.Google Scholar
Gill, J. C. & Thomson, W. (1956). Observations of the behaviour of suckling pigs. British Journal of Animal Behaviour 4, 4651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. & Signoret, J. P. (1969). The behaviour of swine. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 349–90. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cassell.Google Scholar
Hartman, D. A., Ludwick, T. M. & Wilson, R. F. (1962). Certain aspects of lactation performance in sows. Journal of Animal Science 21, 883–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, G., James, J. W. & Wyeth, G. S. F. (1965). Social behaviour of domestic animals. VII. Variations in weaning weight in pigs. Animal Production 7, 6774.Google Scholar
Navraátil, B. (1959). Příspěvek k studiu vyměšovanímléka u prasnic bílého ušlechtilého plemene v ČSR. 3. Někteří činitelé ovlivňující množství mléka. Sborník Československé akademie zemědělskych věd (Zivočišna výroba) 31, 793806.Google Scholar
Van Loen, A. & Molenaar, B. A. J. (1967). A behavioural study in pigs. Methodology in measuring the evolution of the teat order. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 92, 297307.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. & Fraser, D. (1974). The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. II. Vocalization of the sow in relation to suckling behaviour and milk ejection. British Veterinary Journal 130, 346–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wöhlbier, W. (1928). Stoffwechselversuche zum Eiweissansatz bei saugenden Ferkeln. Biochemische Zeitschrift 202, 2969.Google Scholar
Wyeth, G. S. F. & McBride, G. (1964). Social behaviour of domestic animals. V. A note on suckling behaviour in young pigs. Animal Production 6, 245–7.Google Scholar