Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:14:36.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on forage cell walls

3. Effects of feeding alkali-treated rice hulls to sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. C. Choung
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia, 2033
W. R. McManus
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia, 2033

Summary

Results of a 13-week group feeding study (Expt 1) and a 16-day digestion and mineral, nitrogen and water balance study (Expt 2) in which alkali-treated rice hulls were fed to young Border-Leicester × Merino sheep of 24-kg body weight are reported.

Five pelletized diets comprising a 1:1 mixture of ground lucerne and alkali-treated ground rice hulls (Expt 1) or these five diets supplemented with biuret plus one diet of 100% lucerne pellet (Expt 2) were examined.

Sodium hydroxide at levels of 0, 2·5, 5, 10 and 15% (w/w) was applied to rice hulls for 12 h and neutralized with acid. Sheep fed the 5% NaOH treatment level or greater maintained or increased body weight: those fed the 0 and 2·5% level lost body weight. Daily food organic matter intakes were: 5% alkali, 1025 g, 0% alkali, 765 g; 100% lucerne, 1195 g.

Organic matter digestibility was highest (52%) for the diet containing rice hulls treated at the 15% alkali level and this digestion coefficient was significantly greater (P < 0·05) than for the control diet (nil alkali) (42%) but not significantly greater than for diets with 2·5, 5 and 10% levels of alkali.

It'is indicated that cell wall organic matter of rice hulls treated with 15% alkali was digested to an extent of 62% whereas cell wall organic matter in the control diet (0% alkali) was digested to an extent of 13%.

Cellulose digestion (52%) of the rice hull component of diets was not increased by alkali treatment suggesting the alkali to have freed hemicellulose components of the cell wall for digestive attack. Digestibility of lignin of the rice hull component of diets was not significantly increased by alkali treatment.

Animals tolerated the salt contents of diets containing rice hulls treated at high levels of alkali, were able to clear the excess salt from their bodies without significant alteration of their blood haematocrit ratios, and drank significantly more water. All sheep fed diets containing rice hulls had appreciable amounts of soluble silica in their blood plasma (> 100/μg/l) and urine (> 25 μg/l).

It is concluded that alkali beneficiation of rice hulls offers a means of enhancing their nutrient worth to ruminants and that the process requires further study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A.O.A.C. (1965). Official Methods of Analysis (10th Edit..) Washington. D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
A.R.C. (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Bingley, J. B. & Dick, A. T. (1967). Semi-micro determination of inorganic sulphate in plant material. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 15, 539– 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, C. A. Jr, (1904). The chemical composition and feeding value of rice products. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 77, 430–4.Google Scholar
Carmona, J. F. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1972). The digestibility and acceptibility to sheep of chopped and milled barley straw soaked or sprayed with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 477–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, B. E., Neal, E. M. & Riggs, J. K. (1965). The influence of kind and roughage on beef cattle performance. Texas Agricultural Experimental Station (Beeville. Technical Report No. 1).Google Scholar
Edwards, G. B., McManus, W. R. & Bigham, M. L. (1971). The effect of carbon chain length upon extraction of volatile fatty acids from rumen liquor. Journal of Chromatography 63, 397401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eng, K. S. Jr, (1964). The value of ammoniated rice hulls as a ruminant feed. Feedstuffs 36, 44–8.Google Scholar
Huntanuwatr, N., Hinds, R. C. & Davis, C. L. (1974). An evaluation of methods for improving the in vitro digestibility of rice hulls. Journal of Animal Science 38, 140–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, J. B. (1922). The effect of sodium hydrate on the digestibility of grain hulls. Science 55 (1414), 131–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, W. R. & Choung, C. C. (1976). Studies on forage cell walls. 2. Conditions for alkali treatment of rice straw and hulls. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. (1970). Symposium: Sulphur in nutrition (ed. Muth, O. H.), Connecticut: AVI. Publishing Company, p. 165.Google Scholar
Noland, P. R. & Gainer, J. H. (1953). The use of rice hulls as a roughage for wintering steer calves and for gestating-lactating ewes. Bulletin 538 Agricultural Experiment Station Arkansas.Google Scholar
Noland, P. R. & Ford, B. F. (1954). Rice hulls and rice mill feed for wintering steers. Arkansas Farm Research 3, 34.Google Scholar
Peirce, A. W. (1968a). Studies on salt tolerance of sheep. VII. The tolerance of ewes and their lambs in pens for drinking waters of the types obtained from underground sources in Australia. Australian Journal Agricultural Research 19, 577–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, A. W. (1968). Studies on salt tolerance of sheep. VIII. The tolerance of grazing ewes and their lambs for drinking water of the types obtained from underground sources in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 589–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, M. L. & Child, R. D. (1963). Rice hulls in wintering rations. Arkansas Farm Research 12, 25.Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., Miller, P. S. & Lutwak, L. (1966). Estimation of sulphur in biological materials by atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytical & Biological Chemistry 15, 313–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheets, E. W. & Sample, A. T. (1931). Rice and its byproducts for feeding livestock. United States Department of Agriculture. Miscellaneous Publication, Number 132. pp. 30–2.Google Scholar
Singh, M. & Jackson, M. G. (1971). The effect of different levels of sodium hydroxide spray treatment of wheat straw on consumption and digestibility by cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, A. D., Furr, R. D., Hansen, K. R., Sherrod, L. B. & Word, I. D. (1969). Utilization of rice hulls in cattle finishing rations. Journal of Animal Science 29, 792–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1965). Symposium on factors influencing the voluntary intake of herbage by ruminants and voluntary intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 24, 834–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahed, A. B. M. F. (1965). The influence of levels of low quality roughage upon feed lot performance and carcase characteristics of beef cattle fed high concentrate rations. M.S. Thesis. Texas A and M University.Google Scholar
White, T. W. (1966). Utilization of ammoniated rice hulls by beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 25, 25–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T. W., Reynolds, W. L. & Klett, R. H. (1969). Roughage sources and levels in steer rations. Journal of Animal Science 29, 1001–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (1966). The tolerance of sheep to sodium chloride in food or drinking water. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar