Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:23:45.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of the growth and development of winter-heading cauliflowers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. C. E. Wurr
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
Rosemary H. Kay
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystviyth SY2S 3DD
J. C. Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystviyth SY2S 3DD

Summary

The winter-heading cauliflower varieties St Thomas, St Gwithian, St Agnes, Janavon, St Hilary, St Buryan, BB74605, St David and St Keverne were grown at Trefloyne, Tenby for 3 years from 1977 to 1980. Plants of all varieties were sampled periodically to determine the rate of curd expansion, the final number of leaves, the time of curd initiation, and the distribution of dry matter within the plant.

The patterns of development of leaf area were similar in all varieties. Dry-matter distribution was similar for all varieties except for root growth; later-maturing varieties had a greater dry weight of root and a higher proportion of the total dry matter as root, than early varieties. Early rates of curd growth declined with later-maturing varieties and it is suggested that there may be a relationship between the time of curd initiation, root growth and the rate of curd growth.

The mean total number of leaves formed before curd initiation varied from 49 to 102 depending on the variety and year. The earliest varieties St Thomas and St Gwithian took co. 120 days to reach 50% curd initiation and matured in 6–7 months from sowing while the late variety St Keverne took over 200 days to reach 50% initiation and more than 11 months to mature. The time interval between 50% initiation and 50% maturity increased with later-maturing varieties but on the basis of accumulated day degrees > 6 °C it declined with later varieties. The latter also matured more uniformly than earlier varieties when using an accumulated day-degree scale > 6 °C as a time scale.

The results suggest that the low temperature threshold below which curd induction occurs may vary with variety. There was also evidence that the base temperature for curd growth is lower with later-maturing varieties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bremner, P. M. & Taha, M. A. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. I. The effects of variety, seed size and spacing on growth, development and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 241252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P. C. (1977). Genotype × environment interactions in early winter cauliflowers in south-west Britain. Journal of Horticultural Science 52, 357366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haine, K. E. (1959). Time of heading and quality of curd in winter cauliflower. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 8, 667674.Google Scholar
Horne, F. R. (1931). The life history of broccoli. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture 37, 11001106.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (1964). On flower head formation and development in cauliflowers. I. Ecological studies on flower head formation and development. Journal of the Japanese Society of Horticultural Science 33, 316326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leat, P. (1979). Future rests on new Co-op. Grower 92, No. 18, 3334.Google Scholar
MINISTRY OP AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD (1975). Winter cauliflower (brocooli). A.D.A.S. Horticultural Enterprises Booklet 5.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A., Austin, R. B., Bleasdale, J. K. A. & Salter, P. J. (1960). An approach to the study of yearly and other variation in crop yields. Journal of Horticultural Science 35, 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwhof, M. (1969). Cole Crops. London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Sadik, S. (1967). Factors involved in curd and flower formation in cauliflower. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 90, 252259.Google Scholar
Salteb, P. J. (1960). The growth and development of early summer cauliflower in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Horticultural Science 35, 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. (1969). Studies on crop maturity in cauliflower. I. Relationship between times of curd initiation and curd maturity of plants within a cauliflower crop. Journal of Horticultural Science 44, 129140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Fradgley, J. R. A. (1969). Studies on orop maturity in cauliflower. II. Effects of cultural factors on the maturity characteristics of a cauliflower crop. Journal of Horticultural Science 44, 141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & James, J. M. (1974). Further studies on the effects of cold treatment of transplants on crop maturity characteristics of cauliflower. Journal of Horticultural Science 49, 329342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, P. S. (1954). The heading of broccoli. Factors affecting quality and time. Agriculture 61, 431434.Google Scholar
Wiebe, H. J. (1972). Effect of temperature and light on growth and development of cauliflower. II. Optimal vernalization temperature and exposure time. Gartenbauwissenschaft 37, 293303.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E., Akehurst, J. M. & Thomas, T. H. (1981). A hypothesis to explain the relationship between low temperature treatment, gibberellin activity, curd initiation and maturity of cauliflower. Scientia Horticulturae. (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar