Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:58:15.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of natural herbage of the sub-tropics I. The digestibility of herbage grazed by cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. H. Topps
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia

Extract

1. In two continuous digestibility trials carried out in 1960 and 1961, groups of three wether sheep were fed on oven-dried herbage which had been selectively collected from natural pastures during December 1959 to March 1960 and December 1960 to March 1961. The organic matter digestibility and the digestible crude protein content of the herbage and the nitrogen concentration in faeces were measured over periods of 5 days. The fresh faeces of dairy cattle grazing the natural pastures were regularly sampled and analysed. Regressions of organic matter digestibility and digestible crude protein content on faecal nitrogen were evaluated. From these equations and the composition of the dairy cattle faeces the digestibility of the herbage grazed was calculated.

2. The herbage consumed by the cattle had a significantly higher organic matter digestibility and digestible crude protein content than the collected material. This difference, which increased as the season progressed, indicates that dairy cattle became increasingly selective in their grazing as the pasture deteriorated in quality.

3. There was a marked yearly difference in digestibility-faecal nitrogen relationships and in the quality of the consumed forage. The grass eaten in 1959-60 had a higher digestibility and lower digestible crude protein content than in the following year. These differences may be part attributable to a seasonal difference in rainfall.

4. The organic matter digestibility of the grazed herbage ranged from 52·71 to 65·03% and the digestible crude protein content from 3·08 to 7·43% For milk production, the herbage consumed is low in digestible protein in relation to the total amount of digestible nutrients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brockington, N. R. (1960). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 15, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, N. R. (1961). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 16, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougall, H. W. & Bogdan, A. V. (1958). E. Afr. Agric. J. 24, 17.Google Scholar
Dougall, H. W. & Bogdan, A. V. (1960). E. Afr. Agric. J. 25, 241.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. (1956). Rhod. Agric. J. 53, 538.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Croft, A. G. (1958). Rhod. Agric. J. 55, 40.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Fokkema, K. (1960). Rhod. Agric. J. 57, 252.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Foikersten, K. (1961). Rhod. Agric. J. 58, 186.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1957). Herb. Abstr. 27, 1.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Corbett, J. L. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 55, 371.Google Scholar
Lancaster, B. J. (1950). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10, 45.Google Scholar
Milford, R. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, R. (1960). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 11, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1961). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. & Raymond, W. F. (1958). Exp. Grassl. Res. Inst. Hurley, 10, 92.Google Scholar
Rattray, J. M. (1957). Rhod. Agric. J. 54, 197.Google Scholar
Swift, R. W. & Bratzler, J. W. (1959). Bull. Pa. Agric. Expt. Sta. no. 651.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H. & Oliver, J. (1960). Rhod. Agric. J. 57, 287.Google Scholar